taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
B74CF5F9FD2054598278C7F6882AC5E8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1389147	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.261.157609.figure4	Figure 4. Didymoglossum henzaianum (Parish ex Hook.) Mazumdar from the voucher S. Chokrassameehirun 23-105 (BKF). A. Habit; B. Fertile plants; C. False veinlets on lamina segment; D. Sori with obconic – tubular involucres. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	Figure 4. Didymoglossum henzaianum (Parish ex Hook.) Mazumdar from the voucher S. Chokrassameehirun 23-105 (BKF). A. Habit; B. Fertile plants; C. False veinlets on lamina segment; D. Sori with obconic – tubular involucres. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	2025-08-06	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai		Zenodo	biologists	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai			
B74CF5F9FD2054598278C7F6882AC5E8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1389149	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.261.157609.figure6	Figure 6. Morphological comparison of some Didymoglossum species. A – C. D. radiatum; D – F. D. tahitense; G – I. D. henzaianum; J – L. D. sublimbatum; M – O. D. mindorense; P – R. D. bimarginatum; A, D, G, J, M, P. Fronds morphology; B, E, H, K, N, Q. Laminae segments showing false veinlet characters; C, F, I, L, O, R. Sori position and morphology. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	Figure 6. Morphological comparison of some Didymoglossum species. A – C. D. radiatum; D – F. D. tahitense; G – I. D. henzaianum; J – L. D. sublimbatum; M – O. D. mindorense; P – R. D. bimarginatum; A, D, G, J, M, P. Fronds morphology; B, E, H, K, N, Q. Laminae segments showing false veinlet characters; C, F, I, L, O, R. Sori position and morphology. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	2025-08-06	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai		Zenodo	biologists	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai			
49912CD1587F5AD0BD5CD2FDF6DC1A86.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1389148	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.261.157609.figure5	Figure 5. Didymoglossum mindorense (Christ) K. Iwats. from the voucher S. Chokrassameehirun 24-228 (BKF). A. Habit; B. Fertile fronds; C. Lobe of sterile frond; D. Fertile frond. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	Figure 5. Didymoglossum mindorense (Christ) K. Iwats. from the voucher S. Chokrassameehirun 24-228 (BKF). A. Habit; B. Fertile fronds; C. Lobe of sterile frond; D. Fertile frond. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	2025-08-06	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai		Zenodo	biologists	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai			
49912CD1587F5AD0BD5CD2FDF6DC1A86.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1389149	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.261.157609.figure6	Figure 6. Morphological comparison of some Didymoglossum species. A – C. D. radiatum; D – F. D. tahitense; G – I. D. henzaianum; J – L. D. sublimbatum; M – O. D. mindorense; P – R. D. bimarginatum; A, D, G, J, M, P. Fronds morphology; B, E, H, K, N, Q. Laminae segments showing false veinlet characters; C, F, I, L, O, R. Sori position and morphology. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	Figure 6. Morphological comparison of some Didymoglossum species. A – C. D. radiatum; D – F. D. tahitense; G – I. D. henzaianum; J – L. D. sublimbatum; M – O. D. mindorense; P – R. D. bimarginatum; A, D, G, J, M, P. Fronds morphology; B, E, H, K, N, Q. Laminae segments showing false veinlet characters; C, F, I, L, O, R. Sori position and morphology. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	2025-08-06	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai		Zenodo	biologists	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai			
E277DE2D77A650158C43F9DD334C90DD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1389145	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.261.157609.figure2	Figure 2. Didymoglossum radiatum S. Chokrassameehirun, Kraichak & Jaruwatt. from the holotype S. Chokrassameehirun 24-259 (BKF) A. Habit; B. Raised sori of fertile plants; C. Adaxial surface of sterile fronds; D. Abaxial surface of sterile fronds; E. False veinlet construction; F. Sori. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	Figure 2. Didymoglossum radiatum S. Chokrassameehirun, Kraichak & Jaruwatt. from the holotype S. Chokrassameehirun 24-259 (BKF) A. Habit; B. Raised sori of fertile plants; C. Adaxial surface of sterile fronds; D. Abaxial surface of sterile fronds; E. False veinlet construction; F. Sori. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	2025-08-06	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai		Zenodo	biologists	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai			
E277DE2D77A650158C43F9DD334C90DD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1389146	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.261.157609.figure3	Figure 3. Illustration of Didymoglossum radiatum S. Chokrassameehirun, Kraichak & Jaruwatt. based on the holotype S. Chokrassameehirun 24-259 (BKF). A. Fertile frond; B. Sterile fronds; C. False veinlet construction; D – E. Sori with tubular involucres; D. Sori with filiform receptacle; E. Sori borne at the notch of the frond. Illustrated by S. Chokrassameehirun.	Figure 3. Illustration of Didymoglossum radiatum S. Chokrassameehirun, Kraichak & Jaruwatt. based on the holotype S. Chokrassameehirun 24-259 (BKF). A. Fertile frond; B. Sterile fronds; C. False veinlet construction; D – E. Sori with tubular involucres; D. Sori with filiform receptacle; E. Sori borne at the notch of the frond. Illustrated by S. Chokrassameehirun.	2025-08-06	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai		Zenodo	biologists	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai			
E277DE2D77A650158C43F9DD334C90DD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1389149	https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.261.157609.figure6	Figure 6. Morphological comparison of some Didymoglossum species. A – C. D. radiatum; D – F. D. tahitense; G – I. D. henzaianum; J – L. D. sublimbatum; M – O. D. mindorense; P – R. D. bimarginatum; A, D, G, J, M, P. Fronds morphology; B, E, H, K, N, Q. Laminae segments showing false veinlet characters; C, F, I, L, O, R. Sori position and morphology. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	Figure 6. Morphological comparison of some Didymoglossum species. A – C. D. radiatum; D – F. D. tahitense; G – I. D. henzaianum; J – L. D. sublimbatum; M – O. D. mindorense; P – R. D. bimarginatum; A, D, G, J, M, P. Fronds morphology; B, E, H, K, N, Q. Laminae segments showing false veinlet characters; C, F, I, L, O, R. Sori position and morphology. Photographed by S. Chokrassameehirun.	2025-08-06	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai		Zenodo	biologists	Chokrassameehirun, Siwakorn;Kraichak, Ekaphan;Jaruwattanaphan, Tassanai			
