taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
485D879E8D70FFFF5AAB7491FBC1F9D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15077333/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15077333	FIG. 1. — Gubuzhu orientalis n. gen., n. sp., photographs of type material (females): A, C, E, G, H, J, holotype specimen XDA1-1419; B, D, F, I, K, paratype specimen XDB3-0935; A, B, general habitus (eth/ab, following orientation of side ‘A’; in A, upper left corner, side ‘A’ only); C, D, apical part of forewings, as shown on A and B, respectively (both eth/ab; in D, area delimited by dashed line, side ‘A’ only);E, F, details of hindwings,as shown in A and B, respectively (E, eth/b; F, eth/ ab-UV/ab, rotated); G-I, detail of tarsus and tibia, as shown on A and B (all eth/ab-dry/ab-UV/ab); G, foretarsus, showing the lack of tarsal comb; H, metatarsus, showing two posterior spurs (‘spu’) on metatibia and apical spines (‘spi’) on metatibia and metatarsus; I, mesoleg and metaleg, showing the metatibia with apical spines-like setae long, of irregular lengths and spacing; J, K, (eth/ab-UV/ab), termination of abdomen, as shown on A and B, respectively, showing dense, stiff, backward-directed bristles on tergite 6 (‘T6’). Scale bars: A, B, 2 mm; C, D, G-I, 1 mm; E, F, J, K, 0.5 mm. All photographs were taken by the first author.	FIG. 1. — Gubuzhu orientalis n. gen., n. sp., photographs of type material (females): A, C, E, G, H, J, holotype specimen XDA1-1419; B, D, F, I, K, paratype specimen XDB3-0935; A, B, general habitus (eth/ab, following orientation of side ‘A’; in A, upper left corner, side ‘A’ only); C, D, apical part of forewings, as shown on A and B, respectively (both eth/ab; in D, area delimited by dashed line, side ‘A’ only);E, F, details of hindwings,as shown in A and B, respectively (E, eth/b; F, eth/ ab-UV/ab, rotated); G-I, detail of tarsus and tibia, as shown on A and B (all eth/ab-dry/ab-UV/ab); G, foretarsus, showing the lack of tarsal comb; H, metatarsus, showing two posterior spurs (‘spu’) on metatibia and apical spines (‘spi’) on metatibia and metatarsus; I, mesoleg and metaleg, showing the metatibia with apical spines-like setae long, of irregular lengths and spacing; J, K, (eth/ab-UV/ab), termination of abdomen, as shown on A and B, respectively, showing dense, stiff, backward-directed bristles on tergite 6 (‘T6’). Scale bars: A, B, 2 mm; C, D, G-I, 1 mm; E, F, J, K, 0.5 mm. All photographs were taken by the first author.	2025-03-20	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier		Zenodo	biologists	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier			
485D879E8D70FFFF5AAB7491FBC1F9D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15077335/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15077335	FIG. 2. — Gubuzhu orientalis n. gen., n. sp., line drawings of type material (females): A, holotype specimen XDA1-1419; B, paratype specimen XDB3-0935. Scale bars: 2 mm.	FIG. 2. — Gubuzhu orientalis n. gen., n. sp., line drawings of type material (females): A, holotype specimen XDA1-1419; B, paratype specimen XDB3-0935. Scale bars: 2 mm.	2025-03-20	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier		Zenodo	biologists	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier			
485D879E8D70FFFF5AAB7491FBC1F9D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15077341/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15077341	FIG. 3. — Wing venation of Gubuzhu orientalis n. gen., n. sp. and of selected extant Pompilidae, for comparison (pink arrows indicating the hindwing jugal lobe; see description as for orange and blue arrows): A, B, Gubuzhu orientalis n. gen., n. sp.; A, holotype specimen XDA1-1419 (FW2 and HW2 reconstructed unfolded); B, paratype specimen XDB3-0935; C-F, selected extant Pompilidae; C, Anoplius viaticus Linnaeus,1758 (redrawn from Day 1988: fig. 22); D, Priochilus chrysopygus Wasbauer, Cambra & Añino, 2017 (drawing based on Wasbauer et al. 2017: fig 2); E, Anospilus carbonicolor Gussakovskij, 1932 (drawing based on Loktionov & Lelej 2014: fig. 68.15,16); F, Chalcochares hirsutifemur (Banks, 1914) (redrawn from Wasbauer & Kimsey 1985: fig. 26; size information not available). Scale bars: 2 mm.	FIG. 3. — Wing venation of Gubuzhu orientalis n. gen., n. sp. and of selected extant Pompilidae, for comparison (pink arrows indicating the hindwing jugal lobe; see description as for orange and blue arrows): A, B, Gubuzhu orientalis n. gen., n. sp.; A, holotype specimen XDA1-1419 (FW2 and HW2 reconstructed unfolded); B, paratype specimen XDB3-0935; C-F, selected extant Pompilidae; C, Anoplius viaticus Linnaeus,1758 (redrawn from Day 1988: fig. 22); D, Priochilus chrysopygus Wasbauer, Cambra & Añino, 2017 (drawing based on Wasbauer et al. 2017: fig 2); E, Anospilus carbonicolor Gussakovskij, 1932 (drawing based on Loktionov & Lelej 2014: fig. 68.15,16); F, Chalcochares hirsutifemur (Banks, 1914) (redrawn from Wasbauer & Kimsey 1985: fig. 26; size information not available). Scale bars: 2 mm.	2025-03-20	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier		Zenodo	biologists	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier			
485D879E8D70FFFF5AAB7491FBC1F9D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15077345/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15077345	FIG. 5. — Foretarsus morphology in selected Pompilidae:A, Gubuzhu orientalis n.gen.,n. sp.(drawing based on specimen XDA1-1419); B, Evagetes pectinipes Linnaeus, 1758 (redrawn from Day 1988: fig. 18). Scale bar: 1 mm.	FIG. 5. — Foretarsus morphology in selected Pompilidae:A, Gubuzhu orientalis n.gen.,n. sp.(drawing based on specimen XDA1-1419); B, Evagetes pectinipes Linnaeus, 1758 (redrawn from Day 1988: fig. 18). Scale bar: 1 mm.	2025-03-20	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier		Zenodo	biologists	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier			
485D879E8D7FFFFD5B6C711DFBFFF935.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/15077343/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15077343	FIG. 4. — Paleoferreolina xiedensis n. gen., n. sp., photographs and line drawing of holotype specimen XDA1-1911: A, general habitus (eth); B, line drawing (pink arrow indicating the hindwing jugal lobe; see description as for orange and blue arrows); C, head; D, forewing; E, hindwing. Scale bars: A, B, 2 mm; C-E, 1 mm. All photographs were taken by the first author.	FIG. 4. — Paleoferreolina xiedensis n. gen., n. sp., photographs and line drawing of holotype specimen XDA1-1911: A, general habitus (eth); B, line drawing (pink arrow indicating the hindwing jugal lobe; see description as for orange and blue arrows); C, head; D, forewing; E, hindwing. Scale bars: A, B, 2 mm; C-E, 1 mm. All photographs were taken by the first author.	2025-03-20	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier		Zenodo	biologists	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier			
