identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
485D879E8D71FFF2594D72FBFB6DF832.text	485D879E8D71FFF2594D72FBFB6DF832.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gubuzhu X. - T. Xu & C. Waichert 2025	<div><p>Genus  Gubuzhu X.-T. Xu &amp; C. Waichert,  n. gen.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: EB0CA72D-EC98-4F35-A803-6026DC32BDEF</p><p>TYPE SPECIES. —  Gubuzhu orientalis X.-T. Xu &amp; C. Waichert,  n. sp.; monotypic genus.</p><p>ETYMOLOGY. — From Chinese ‘gu’ (古), meaning ‘ancient’, and ‘buzhu’ (捕蛛), meaning ‘catching spider’. Gender feminine.</p><p>DIAGNOSIS. — As for the type species.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/485D879E8D71FFF2594D72FBFB6DF832	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier	Xu, Xiao-Ting, Waichert, Cecília, Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong, Su, Tao, Béthoux, Olivier (2025): Spider wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) from Xiede (Eocene, central Tibetan Plateau): systematics and paleoecological implications. Geodiversitas 47 (6): 313-325, DOI: 10.5252/geodiversitas2025v47a6, URL: https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/sites/default/files/articles/pdf/geodiversitas2025v47a6.pdf
485D879E8D70FFFF5AAB7491FBC1F9D6.text	485D879E8D70FFFF5AAB7491FBC1F9D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gubuzhu orientalis X. - T. Xu & C. Waichert 2025	<div><p>Gubuzhu orientalis X.-T. Xu &amp; C. Waichert,  n. gen., n. sp.</p><p>(Figs 1-3; 5A)</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 8C8235F1-9160-4914-8934-0BC9BF609564</p><p>TYPE MATERIAL. —   Holotype. China • 1♀; West China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Naqu City, Shuanghu County, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=88.42833&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=31.973057" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 88.42833/lat 31.973057)">Xiede Village</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=88.42833&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=31.973057" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 88.42833/lat 31.973057)">Xiede</a> locality; 31°58’23”N, 88°25’42”E; Xiede section, Nima Basin, Niubao Formation; Bartonian (Eocene); 4662 m a.m.s.l.; VI.2019; XTBG exped.; XTBG; XDA1-1419A, B.</p><p>Paratype. China • 1♀; same data as for the holotype; XDB3-0935A, B.</p><p>ETYMOLOGY. — From Latin oriēns (‘rising sun’), referring to the known area of occurrence of the species.</p><p>TYPE LOCALITY AND STRATIGRAPHY. — Both holotype and paratype were collected at the Xiede locality (northern Kanggale Hill, Tibet, China); Xiede section, Nima Basin, Niubao Formation (see Zhang et al. 2022 for detailed information); Bartonian (Eocene; Fang et al. 2020; Xiong et al. 2022).</p><p>DIAGNOSIS. — In female, the third antennal segment is about 3× as long as wide; the clypeus is trapezoidal; the pronotum is rather short; the metatibia bears apical spines-like setae, which are long, distinctly splayed, of irregular lengths and spacing; the forewing has three submarginal cells (1R1, 1Rs and 2Rs), and the vein Cu is distinctly deflected downward at base; the hindwing jugal lobe is large (about 0.70-0.75× the length of Cu cell); and the tergite 6 has dense, stiff, backward-directed bristles.</p><p>GENERAL DESCRIPTION</p><p>Measurements (in mm)</p><p>Body length (excluding antenna) 11.8-14.8 (holotype 14.8; paratype 11.8).</p><p>Head. Compound eyes about 2.0-2.2× as long as wide (1.6-2.0 long and 0.7-1.0 wide in maximum); MID = 1.0-1.2; UID = 1.0-1.1; LID = 0.6-0.7; TFD = 3.0 (measured in holotype); FD = 2.6 (measured in holotype); third antennal segment about 2.8-2.9× as long as wide (0.7-0.8 long and 0.2-0.3 wide).</p><p>Mesosoma. 1.5× as long as wide (5.2 long and 3.5 wide in maximum;measured in holotype);propodeum 1.6long and3.5wide in maximum (measured in holotype); metafemur about 3.3× as long as wide (2.0-2.7 long and 0.6-0.8 wide in maximum, measured in holotype); the longer metatibial spur 1.7-2.0× as long as third antennal segment (1.3-1.4 long); metabasitarsus 2.3-2.4 long.</p><p>Wings. Forewing 3.5-4.1× as long as wide (9.4 long and 2.7 wide in holotype; 8.2-8.3 long and 2.0-2.2 wide in paratype); hind wing 3.6× as long as wide (6.3 long and 1.7 wide in maximum; measured in holotype).</p><p>Metasoma. 6.2-7.6 long.</p><p>Head (Figs 1A, B; 2)</p><p>Almost as wide as long; TFD about 1.2× FD; TFD about 2.5× MID; compound eyes large, with inner margin slightly emarginate, 2.0-2.2× as long as wide, UID about 1.4× LID; ocelli in a compact triangle, nearer to each other than to compound eyes; vertex almost straight; clypeus short, trapezoidal, anterior margin straight; antenna elongate, thin, third antennal segment 2.8-2.9× as long as wide.</p><p>Mesosoma</p><p>Pronotum rather short, while delimitation of pronotum and scutum inconspicuous. Legs slender, metafemur 3.3-3.4× as long as wide (measured in holotype); protibia with one posterior spur (calcar), meso- and metatibia with two spurs; the longer metatibial spur 0.6× metabasitarsus length; metatibia with apical spines-like setae long, distinctly splayed, of irregular lengths and spacing (Fig. 1I, H); foretarsus lacking conspicuous spines on the outer side (Fig. 5A).</p><p>Forewing (Figs 1C, D; 3A, B)</p><p>Maximum width 0.2-0.3× its length, with 3 submarginal cells; 2 R 1 cell almost as long as its distance from wing tip; 2Rs cell longer than 1Rs cell; 2m-cu vein slightly bowed toward wing apex, meeting 2Rs cell 0.6× distance from base to apex of cell [i.e., length of the section of the basal posterior edge of 2Rs cell to the insertion of 2m-cu cross-vein (orange arrow on Fig. 3A) about 0.6× that of the entire posterior edge of 2Rs cell]; 2m-cu vein arising on Cu longer than or about half the distance from the base of 2M cell to the outer wing margin [i.e., section of Cu located between its insertion of 2cu-a and 2m-cu cross-veins (blue arrow on Fig. 3A), longer than or almost as long as the section of Cu located between its insertion of 2m-cu cross-vein to its projected termination on the wing margin (blue fame arrow on Fig. 3A)]; Cu vein distinctly deflected downward at base (‘de’ on Fig. 3A).</p><p>Hindwing (Fig. 1E, F)</p><p>With cu-a cross-vein reaching the M+Cu vein basal to the M/Cu split; jugal lobe very large, about 0.70-0.75× length of Cu cell (Fig. 1E, F; pink arrows on Fig. 3A, B).</p><p>Metasoma</p><p>First segment of metasoma inconspicuous for both specimens. Tergite 6 with dense, stiff, backward-directed bristles (Fig. 1J, K).</p><p>Coloration</p><p>Integument dark on head and mesosoma, lighter on metasoma; punctuation inconspicuous; forewing (Fig. 1C, D) hyaline, darkened in about 1/4 of the apical portion, and a dark spot at 2/3 of wing length, partially covering cells 2 R 1, 1 R 1 1Rs, 2Rs, and 1M (Figs 1C; 2A).</p><p>REMARKS ON THE TYPE SERIES</p><p>Holotype specimen, XDA 1-1419A,B (Figs 1A, C, E, G, H, J; 2A; 5A), adpressions in both positive and negative aspects (but indistinguishable as a consequence of rock compression) of a nearly complete body in dorso-ventral orientation. Apex of FW2 partially folded (Figs 1A; 3A); FW1 well exposed, partly overlapping HW1 (Figs 1C; 2A).Tibia pale, almost invisible except for apical part; legs lack thick spines along length, with spurs, few apical spines on tibia and tarsi (Fig. 1G, H). Forewing coloration is well preserved (Figs 1C; 2A).</p><p>Paratype specimen, XDB3-0935A, B (Figs 1 B, D, F, I, K; 2B), adpression in both positive and negative aspects (but indistinguishable as a consequence of rock compression) of a nearly complete body in lateral orientation.Mouthpart poorly-exposed; antennae apparently detached from torulus; forelegs and one of the mesolegs lacking. Forewings well exposed, overlapping with one of the hindwings (HW2; Figs 1B, F; 2B). Tibia with at least two spines on the outer surface and unevenly-spaced spines, of unequal length, at the apex (Fig. 1I).</p><p>REMARKS</p><p>The specimens treated here can confidently be assigned to the family  Pompilidae based on a distinctive combination of wing venation characters (see Day 1988; Rodriguez et al. 2017), relatively uniform for the family. The specimens can be further assigned to the  Pompilinae owing to the occurrence of: 1) forewing having cell 2M deflected downward at the base (‘de’ on Fig. 1C, D); 2) vein M not reaching wing margin; 3) metatibia with apical spines-like setae long, distinctly splayed, of irregular lengths and spacing (Fig. 1I); and 4) eyes not close together beneath antennal socket (Day 1988). Within the subfamily, an assignment to the  Pompilini is indicated by the: 1) forewing with three submarginal cells; 2) pronotum shorter than mesonotum; 3) postero-lateral angles of propodeum not produced backward (Evans 1949). At the genus level, the  Pompilidae as a whole have traditionally been regarded as a taxonomically difficult group, with a systematic framework often based on slight differences or a particular combination of character states, which are often homoplasies (Wasbauer &amp; Kimsey 1985; Waichert et al. 2015). Within  Pompilinae, dense bristles on the tergite 6 of female are present in  Anoplius Dufour, 1834,  Anospilus Haupt, 1929,  Lophopompilus Radoszkowski, 1887 ( Pompilini) and some species of  Priochilus Banks, 1944b (Priochilini; Pitts et al. 2006; Wasbauer et al. 2017; note that such bristles occur also in most Pepsinae, the sister-group of  Pompilinae). We justify not placing the new specimens in  Anospilus by the later having fine bristles, whereas they are thick in the former. (Fig. 1J, K); moreover, species of  Lophopompilus present protarsus with comb (Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2015), which is lacking in the new specimens (Fig. 5A). Finally, the most distinctive character state to distinguish the specimens XDA 1-1419 and XDB3-0935 from these genera is a much larger hindwing jugal lobe, about 0.70-0.75× the length of Cu cell (pink arrow on Fig. 3A, B; in the other genera it is small, at most half the length of the Cu cell, see pink arrow on Fig. 3 C-E for  Anoplius,  Anospilus and  Priochilus, and see Regan (1923) for  Lophopompilus). Note that, among tribe  Pompilini, a large jugal lobe is also present in the genus  Chalcochares Banks, 1917 (Fig. 3F). However, in addition to the occurrence (or lack thereof) of dense bristles, the new specimens differ from this genus by, in the hind wing, the cu-a cross-vein reaches the M+Cu vein basal to the M/Cu split (Figs 1E, F; 3A, B), whereas in  Chalcochares the cu-a cross-vein meets M+Cu at the M/Cu split (Fig. 3F).</p><p>We also carried out a comparison with other, known fossil  Pompilinae, mostly based on forewing venation. According to the revision by Rodriguez et al. (2017), six species can be confidently assigned to the subfamily, including  Agenioideus saxigenus (Cockerell, 1908),  Anoplius planeta Rodriguez &amp; Pitts, 2016 in Rodriguez et al. (2016b),  Tainopompilus argentum Rodriguez &amp; Pitts, 2016 in Rodriguez et al. (2016b),  Tenthredinites bifasciata Meunier, 1915,  Pompilinites coquandi (Theobald, 1937) and  Pompilinites depressus (Statz, 1936) (with the taxonomic concept ‘  Pompilinites ’ to be understood as a ‘collective group’ including fossil species belonging to  Pompilinae but which formal generic placement cannot be assessed; Rodriguez et al. 2017). The proposed new species can be easily distinguished from  Agenioideus saxigenus by its 2m-cu vein meeting the 2Rs cell 0.6× distance from base to apex of the 2Rs cell (Fig. 3A, B), while in the latter the 2m-cu vein meets the 2Rs cell 0.95× distance from base to apex of the 2Rs cell (Rodriguez et al. 2017: fig. 4A). The proposed new species differs from  Anoplius planeta by its 2m-cu vein arises on Cu cell longer than or about half the distance from the base of the 2M cell to the outer margin (see blue arrows on Fig. 3A, B), while in the latter the 2m-cu vein arises on the Cu cell less than half the distance from the base of the 2M cell to the outer wing margin (Rodriguez et al. 2016b). In  Tainopompilus argentum and  Pompilinites depressus, the pterostigma is larger than, or about half the length of the 2 R 1 cell, respectively (Rodriguez et al. 2016b: fig. 2; Statz 1936), while it is less than the third of the length of the 2 R 1 cell in the new specimens. The case of  Tenthredinites bifasciata is difficult, as the location of the holotype is undetermined (Rodriguez et al. 2017), and the available data is limited, with, besides the original description (Meunier 1915), a revision by Theobald (1937). Moreover, according to this author, it may represent the female of  Pompilites fasciatus (Theobald, 1937), which may not be a  Pompilinae (Rodriguez et al. 2017). However, forewing coloration pattern, at least, indicate that the new specimens differ from this species (in which the forewing has two dark stripes, with one covering the base of the 1 R 1, 1M and 2Cu cells, and the other partially covering the 2 R 1, 1Rs, 2Rs and 2M cells). Lastly, the 2m-cu vein is straight in  Pompilinites coquandi (Theobald, 1937), while it is slightly bowed towards the wing apex in the new specimens.</p><p>In summary, based on the unique combination of character states mentioned above, the erection of a new genus and species is supported.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/485D879E8D70FFFF5AAB7491FBC1F9D6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier	Xu, Xiao-Ting, Waichert, Cecília, Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong, Su, Tao, Béthoux, Olivier (2025): Spider wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) from Xiede (Eocene, central Tibetan Plateau): systematics and paleoecological implications. Geodiversitas 47 (6): 313-325, DOI: 10.5252/geodiversitas2025v47a6, URL: https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/sites/default/files/articles/pdf/geodiversitas2025v47a6.pdf
485D879E8D7CFFFF596772D1FB6DF832.text	485D879E8D7CFFFF596772D1FB6DF832.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Paleoferreolina X. - T. Xu & C. Waichert 2025	<div><p>Genus  Paleoferreolina X.-T. Xu &amp; C. Waichert,  n. gen.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 0866BA28-6F31-4D12-9ABC-3A0354876AAC</p><p>TYPE SPECIES. —  Paleoferreolina xiedensis X.-T. Xu &amp; C. Waichert,  n. sp .; monotypic genus.</p><p>ETYMOLOGY. — From grec ‘palaiós’ (παλαιός), meaning ancient, and ‘ferreolina’, a subtribe proposed by Priesner (1969), which the new species is morphologically related to. Gender feminine.</p><p>DIAGNOSIS. — As for the type species.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/485D879E8D7CFFFF596772D1FB6DF832	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier	Xu, Xiao-Ting, Waichert, Cecília, Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong, Su, Tao, Béthoux, Olivier (2025): Spider wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) from Xiede (Eocene, central Tibetan Plateau): systematics and paleoecological implications. Geodiversitas 47 (6): 313-325, DOI: 10.5252/geodiversitas2025v47a6, URL: https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/sites/default/files/articles/pdf/geodiversitas2025v47a6.pdf
485D879E8D7FFFFD5B6C711DFBFFF935.text	485D879E8D7FFFFD5B6C711DFBFFF935.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Paleoferreolina xiedensis Xu & Waichert 2025	<div><p>Paleoferreolina xiedensis X.-T. Xu &amp; C. Waichert, n. gen, n. sp.</p><p>(Fig. 4)</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 13C9D73F-98E9-48A9-8E7D-0F46B66C9B73</p><p>TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype (by monotypy). China • 1♀; West China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Naqu City, Shuanghu County, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=88.42833&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=31.973057" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 88.42833/lat 31.973057)">Xiede Village</a>, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=88.42833&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=31.973057" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 88.42833/lat 31.973057)">Xiede</a> locality; 31°58’23”N, 88°25’42”E; Xiede section, Niubao Formation, Nima Basin; Bartonian (Eocene); 4662 m a.m.s.l.; VI.2019; XTBG exped.; XTBG.; XDA1-1911 (one side preserved).</p><p>ETYMOLOGY. — Referring to type locality of the species.</p><p>TYPE LOCALITY AND STRATIGRAPHY. — Specimen was collected at the Xiede locality (northern Kanggale Hill, central Tibetan Plateau, China); Xiede section, Niubao Formation, Nima Basin (see Zhang et al. 2022 for detailed information); Bartonian (Eocene; Fang et al. 2020; Xiong et al. 2022).</p><p>DIAGNOSIS. —In female, the third antennal segment is about 2.5× as long as wide; the head is flat and prolonged; the pronotum is prolonged with lateral margins rounded; the forewing has three submarginal cells (1R1, 1Rs and 2Rs), and the vein Cu is distinctly deflected downward at base.</p><p>DESCRIPTION</p><p>Mesurements (in mm)</p><p>Body length as preserved (from head to apex of metatrochanter) about 6.3.</p><p>Head. Compound eyes about 1.7× as long as wide (1.4 long and 0.8 wide in maximum); MID = 1.4; TFD = 2.0; FD = 1.7; third antennal segment 3.1-3.6× as long as wide (0.62- 0.65 long and 0.18-0.20 wide).</p><p>Mesosoma. About 3.9 long.</p><p>Wings. Forewing 3.2-4.1× as long as wide (7.0-7.5 long and 1.8-2.2 wide in maximum).</p><p>GENERAL DESCRIPTION</p><p>Individual preserved in lateral to dorso-ventral orientation; head and mesosoma preserved; legs with mainly coxa preserved; only one of the hindwings preserved; metasoma not preserved.</p><p>Head (Fig. 4C)</p><p>Compound eyes large, with inner margin emarginate, 1.7× as long as wide; ocelli farther to each other than to compound eyes; vertex almost straight; antenna elongate, thin; third antennal segment 3.1-3.6× as long as wide.</p><p>Mesosoma</p><p>Pronotum prolonged with lateral margins rounded, division of pronotum and scutum almost inconspicuous (Fig. 4A); legs with coxae wide; propodeum separate laterally from metapleuron by carina, posterior margin rounded.</p><p>Forewing (Fig. 4D)</p><p>With 2 R 1 longer than its distance from wing tip; 2Rs cell almost as long as 1Rs; 2m-cu vein slightly bowed toward wing apex, meeting 2Rs cell 0.5-0.6× distance from base to apex of cell [i.e., length of the section from the basal posterior edge of 2Rs cell to the insertion of 2m-cu cross-vein (orange arrow on Fig. 4B) about 0.5-0.6× that of the entire posterior edge of 2Rs cell]; 2m-cu vein arising on the Cu longer than half the distance from the base of the 2M cell to the outer wing margin [i.e., section of Cu located between its insertion of 2cu-a and 2m-cu cross-veins (blue arrow onFig. 4B), longer than the section of Cu located between its insertion of 2m-cu cross-vein to its projected termination on the wing margin (blue fame arrow on Fig. 4B)]; vein Cu distinctly deflected downward at base.</p><p>Hindwing</p><p>With jugal lobe slightly shorter than half the length of Cu cell (pink arrow on Fig. 4B, E).</p><p>Coloration integument dark on head and mesosoma. Punctuation inconspicuous. Forewings hyaline, darkened in about 1/4 of the apical portion, and a dark spot at 2/3 of wing length, partially covering cell 2 R 1, 1 R 1 and 1Rs (Fig. 4B, D).</p><p>REMARKS</p><p>The specimen XDA 1-1911 is assigned to the  Pompilinae based on the forewing having cell 2M deflected downward at the base, forming a posterior ‘pocket’ (‘de’ on Fig. 4D). Even though the colour pattern of its forewing is similar to that of  G. orientalis n. gen, n. sp., it can be distinguished from this species by many character states, as follows: 1) the pronotum is prolonged (rather short in  G. orientalis n. gen, n. sp.); 2) the third antennal segment is longer, about 3.1-3.6× as long as wide (2.8-2.9× as long as wide in  G. orientalis n. gen, n. sp.); 3) the forewing is shorter, about 7.0- 7.5 mm long (8.2-9.4 mm long in  G. orientalis n. gen, n. sp.); 4) the forewing has the cell 2 R 1 longer than its distance from wing tip (almost equal in  G. orientalis n. gen, n. sp.); 5) the 2Rs cell is almost as long as 1Rs (it is longer than the 1Rs cell in  G. orientalis n. gen, n. sp.); and 6) the hindwing has the jugal lobe slightly shorter than half the length of Cu cell (it is about 0.70-0.75× the length of Cu cell in  G. orientalis n. gen, n. sp.). The specimen XDA 1- 1911 therefore indicates the occurrence of a second species of  Pompilinae at Xiede locality.</p><p>The specimen resembles extant species of  Ferreola Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, 1845 (tribe  Aporini, subtribe  Eoferrolina), which has a long head, somehow compressed dorsal-ventrally, a robust body with long pronotum, and three cubital cells in the forewing (Loktionov &amp; Lelej 2017). However, other lineages of  Pompilidae, such as  Paraferreola Šustera, 1912 (tribe  Psammoderini),  Lepidocnemis Haupt, 1930 and  Abernessia Arlé, 1947 (Pepsinae), and Ctenocerinae genera are known to morphologically, and probably ecologically, converge to species of  Aporini (Waichert et al. 2015). For the reason mentioned above, and the fact that the specimen lacks most of the legs and metasoma, a placement of the specimen to the tribe  Aporini could be considered, but is poorly substantiated. Nonetheless, the specimen differs from all these genera for lacking vertical ridges or conical processes in the posterolateral portion of propodeum. Based on the unique combination of character states mentioned above, the erection of a new genus and species is supported.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/485D879E8D7FFFFD5B6C711DFBFFF935	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Xu, Xiao-Ting;Waichert, Cecília;Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong;Su, Tao;Béthoux, Olivier	Xu, Xiao-Ting, Waichert, Cecília, Deng, Wei-Yu-Dong, Su, Tao, Béthoux, Olivier (2025): Spider wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) from Xiede (Eocene, central Tibetan Plateau): systematics and paleoecological implications. Geodiversitas 47 (6): 313-325, DOI: 10.5252/geodiversitas2025v47a6, URL: https://sciencepress.mnhn.fr/sites/default/files/articles/pdf/geodiversitas2025v47a6.pdf
