taxonID	type	description	language	source
B905781CFFDBFFA55E6F87BCFD1D3770.taxon	description	[Iran, Province Alborz, County Shahriyar, 1530 m, 35 ° 41 ' 09 " N 50 ° 32 ' 02 " E, 3 Mai 2011] [Photo: © M. Reza Ehsanimarani (https: // www. inaturalist. org / observations / 154904222)] to be sent out to Persia [now Iran] with the purpose of bringing back living faterial for the efbellishfent of her garden in Trianon (PLUCHET & 2014: 36 – 37). Provided with an annual pension paid for by her brother-in-law Louis Stanislas Xavier de France & Cofte de Provence (1755 – 1824) & later Louis XOEIII & King of France & Michaux left Paris in February 1782. Maintaining correspondence with Louis Guillaufe Le Monnier [Lefonnier] (1717 – 1799) & professor at the Jardin du Roi & he entered ‘ Persia’ in the autufn of 1783 (PLUCHET & 2014: 204) & a country then reigned over by shah Ali-Morad Khan Zand (1740 – 1785). In a letter frof Ispahan [now Isfahan & Iran] dated 10 May 1784 & Michaux fentioned to Lefonnier that afong his new plants was one ‘ Rosa fonophylla’ (PLUCHET & 2014: 201) & which certainly refers to R. ðerþica because this is the only species of the genus with sifple leaves and lacking stipules. Michaux’s report is corroborated by two specifens & the first conserved in the herbariuf of Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu (P-JU no 14173 [P 00667267]) & the second in the herbariuf of Sir Joseph Banks (BM 000946994). The forfer is an early fruiting specifen (DERKENNE & 2020: 174) annotated in the hand of Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu (1748 – 1836) “ apporté de Perse par M. Michaut [sic] André en 1785 [brought frof Persia by André Michaut in 1785] ” & a date which is in agreefent with Michaux’s return to Paris in early July 1785 (PLUCHET & 2014: 205). Additionally & we find the notes “ Rosa sifplicifolia Juss. ” and “ Rosa persica Gfel. ” in the safe hand (Fig. 2) & while the second specifen at BM carries only the note “ Persia André Michaux ” in an unknown hand. Appointed King’s botanist on 18 July 1785 & Michaux was subsequently sent out for another collecting trip and left the harbour of Lorient for New York on 28 Septefber 1785 (PLUCHET & 2014: 205). Needless to say & he was unable to [Michaux s. n., P-JU no 14173 (P 00667267); © Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris] publish the plants that he had gathered during his expedition to the Orient which had brought hif as far as Anzali [now Bandar Anzali & Iran] on the Caspian Sea. Michaux’s specifen fust have been passed to Antoine-Laurent de Jussieu & subdefonstrator for the exterior of plants at the Jardin du Roi (GENEIX & 2023) & who provided a brief description fentioning that Michaux had brought the plant frof Persia “ Rosa … [adde:] Species nova sifplicifolia & stipulis spinaeforfibus & & calicis laciniis ofnibus nudis & Persica inventore D. Michaut [sic] ” in the Appendix of his Genera Plantarum (JUSSIEU & 1789: 452). In doing so & however & Jussieu did not provide an epithet for his novelty. Jussieu’s ofission was quickly spotted by Johann Friedrich Gfelin (1748 – 1804) & professor at Göttingen University & who validated the nafe Roþa ðerþica. Without presenting evidence & it has been stated that Michaux’s seeds of this rose were cultivated by André Thouin (1747 – 1824) & head-gardener at the Jardin du Roi & and were also cultivated by order of Sir Joseph Banks (1743 – 1820) in the Royal Garden & Kew (PLUCHET & 2014: 195). For the second statefent proof has been found in the second edition of Hortuþ KeƜenþiþ & where the entry for Roþa berberifolia (a synonyf of R. ðerþica & see below) carries the note “ Intro. [duced] about 1790 & by the Right Hon. Sir Joseph Banks & Bart. K. B. ” (AITON & 1811: 258; for Robert Brown’s share in this work see MABBERLEY & 1985: 183 – 188). However & this accession does not seef to have been successful because in the entry for R. berberifolia (see below) in Rees’s The Cycloðedia it was noted “ the plants did not long survive ” (SMITH & 1815). Richard Anthony Salisbury & né Markhaf (1761 – 1829) & a gentlefan of private feans & published a detailed description of Roþa ðerþica in his Prodromuþ þtirðium in horto ad Chaðel Allerton υigentium (SALISBURY & 1796: 359) and attached the nafe R. þimðlicifolia Salisb. to it. He explicitly based this nafe on the specifen in the Banks herbariuf (BM 000946994) and noted “ Sponte nascentef in Persia & legit Andr. Michaux ”. Interestingly Salisbury had also received living faterial frof Banks for his garden in Chapel Allerton & now a suburb of Leeds & noting that it had survived only for two years in cultivation (SALISBURY & 1796: 360). It has been stated that Salisbury had supplefented his description frof these living plants (BRITTON & 1916) & but this argufent is irrelevant here.	en	Lack, Hans Walter, Callmander, Martin W. (2024): The discovery, naming and typification of Rosa persica (Rosaceae) with notes on its introduction into cultivation. Candollea 79 (2): 283-294, DOI: 10.15553/c2024v792a5, URL: https://doi.org/10.15553/c2024v792a5
B905781CFFD1FFAB5D3F800DFD6A3350.taxon	description	Neotypus (designated here): IRAN: “ Persia ” & 1784 & Michaux þ. n. (P-JU no 14173 [P 00667267 & right hand specifen]!; isoneo-: BM [BM 006946994] ifage!) (Fig. 2). = Roþa þimðlicifolia Salisb. & Prodr. Stirp. Chap. Allerton 359. 1796. Holotypus: IRAN: “ Persia ” & 1784 & Michaux þ. n. (BM [BM 006946994] ifage!; iso-: P-JU no 14173 [P 00667267 & right hand specifen]!). = Roþa berberifolia Siev. in Neue Nord. Beytr. Phys. Geogr. Erd- OEölkerbeschreib. 7: 295. 1796. ÷ Hulthemia berberifolia (Siev.) Dufort. & Not. Hulthefia 13. 1824. ÷ LoƜea berberifolia (Siev.) Lindl. in Edwards’s Bot. Reg. 15: tab. 1261. 1829. – Rhodoðþiþ berberifolia (Siev.) Ledeb. ex Dippel & Handb. Laubholzk. 3: 601. 1891 [nof. inval. pro syn.]. Lectotypus (designated here): KAZAKHSTAN: “ Улджаръ ” [Urzhar river] & [1790 – 1794] & Sieυerþ þ. n. (B-W [B - W 09815 - 01 0]!; isolecto-: HAL [HAL 0120066] ifage!; possible isolecto-: LE [herb. Stephan] ifage!) (Fig. 3).	en	Lack, Hans Walter, Callmander, Martin W. (2024): The discovery, naming and typification of Rosa persica (Rosaceae) with notes on its introduction into cultivation. Candollea 79 (2): 283-294, DOI: 10.15553/c2024v792a5, URL: https://doi.org/10.15553/c2024v792a5
B905781CFFD1FFAB5D3F800DFD6A3350.taxon	description	Noteþ. – GMELIN (1791: 855) repeated JUSSIEU (1789: 452) ’ s description but in a fodified forf and explicitly added the note ‘ Michaut apud Jussieu gen. plant. p. 452 ’ (GMELIN & 1791: 855). Since the nafe Roþa ðerþica was not published solely by reference to a previously and ef fectively published description or diagnosis (ICN Art. 38.1) but associated with a separate description and & secondly & since Gfelin included a reference to Jussieu’s description and not to a specifen & a neotype has to be designated (ICN Art 9.8). Sievers’s collection deposited in B-W is designated here the lectotype of Roþa berberifolia. A duplicate is deposited at HAL and also in the herb. Stephan at LE (see above). [Redouté, P. - J., Les Roses, Paris, 1817; © Bibliothèque, Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de Genève] Edfond Boissier (1810 – 1885) in the second volufe of his Flora Orientaliþ described Hulthemia berberifolia var. þtenoðhylla. Two sheets are deposited under that nafe in G-BOIS. Kotþchy 26 & which is cited in the protologue & and Kotþchy 26 a that is not explicitly cited in the protologue and bears the deterfination “ Rosa berberifolia var. spathulata ”. We therefore prefer to designate Kotþchy 26 [G 00795111] as the lectotype of this variety with two duplicates in the general herbariuf at G.	en	Lack, Hans Walter, Callmander, Martin W. (2024): The discovery, naming and typification of Rosa persica (Rosaceae) with notes on its introduction into cultivation. Candollea 79 (2): 283-294, DOI: 10.15553/c2024v792a5, URL: https://doi.org/10.15553/c2024v792a5
