Adetus nanus (Fairmaire and Germain, 1859)

(Fig. 72–75)

Talaepora nana Fairmaire and Germain 1859: 522; Strauch 1861: 137.

Agennopsis nana; Thomson 1868: 154; Lacordaire 1872: 594; Thomson 1878: 20 (type).

Adetus nanus; Gemminger 1873: 3099 (cat.); Philippi 1887: 775 (cat.); Bruch 1912: 208 (cat.); Aurivillius 1922: 289 (cat.); Bruch 1939: 202 (distr.); Blackwelder 1946: 597 (checklist); Breuning 1960: 180 (cat.); 1971: 305; Cerda 1986: 37; Monné 1994: 29 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 184 (checklist); Monné 2005: 282 (cat.); 2018: 384 (cat.).

Adetus latericius Belon 1902: 468, 472; Aurivillius 1922: 289 (cat.); Blackwelder 1946: 596 (checklist); Breuning 1960: 180 (cat.); 1971: 308; Monné 1994: 27 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 184 (checklist); Monné 2005: 280 (cat.); Wappes et al. 2006: 24 (distr.); Martins et al. 2009: 517 (distr.); Monné 2018: 382 (cat.). Syn. nov.

Atimuropsis irregularis Breuning 1939: 233; Blackwelder 1946: 596 (checklist). Syn. nov.

Adetus irregularis; Breuning 1960: 180 (cat.); 1971: 310; Monné 1994: 27 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 184 (checklist); Martins and Galileo 2003: 374 (syn.); Monné 2005: 280 (cat.); Morvan and Roguet 2013: 21 (distr.); Martins et al. 2014: 379 (distr.); Monné 2018: 382 (cat.).

Adetus gracilis Breuning 1940: 38; 1946: 598 (checklist); 1960: 180 (cat.); Zajciw 1966: 6 (distr.); Silva 1967: 35 (distr.); Breuning 1971: 308; Monné 1994: 27 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 184 (checklist).

Fairmaire and Germain (1859) described the species based on a single specimen (Fig. 73) from Chile. Although it is not impossible that the species occurs in Chile, it has never been reported as being collected in that country since. Thus, it is probable that the holotype was incorrectly labeled. Bruch (1912) recorded A. nanus for Argentina.

Belon (1902) described A. latericius (Fig. 72) based on a single specimen from Bolivia. Comparing the original description of this species with that of A. nanus, as well as photographs of the holotypes, it is not possible to separate it from the latter.

Breuning (1939) described Atimuropsis irregularis based on a single specimen from Brazil (Pernambuco), and Breuning (1940) described Adetus gracilis based on syntypes from Brazil (Ceará). Breuning (1940) provided two dimensions, indicating he had, at least, two specimens (“Länge 7–9 mm; Breite 12 ⁄ 3 – 21 ⁄ 4 ”), but he pointed out: “Typ von Brasilien: Cearà im britischen Museum.” The available informa- tion is contradictory because Breuning (1971) affirmed that the species was described based on a single specimen. Breuning (1971) also provided a new record for A. gracilis: Brazil (Pernambuco). Martins and Galileo (2003) correctly synonymized P. gracilis (Fig. 75) with P. irregularis (Fig. 74). However, the original descriptions, as well as photographs of the types do not allow separation of A. irregularis from A. nanus .

Known geographical distribution (Monné 2018). Chile, Bolivia (Cochabamba), French Guiana, Brazil (Maranhão, Pernambuco, Ceará), Argentina.

Material examined. COLOMBIA (New country record), Bolivar: Zambrano (Hacienda Monterrey, 70 m, 9°37′48″N 74°54′44″W), 1 female, no date indicated, F. Fernandez and G. Ulloa col. (MZSP). VENEZUELA (New country record), Miranda: 2 km SW Caucagua (300’), 1 female, 3.VIII.1988, C. & L. O’Brien & G. Wibmer col. (ACMT). BRAZIL, Pará (New state record): Óbidos (Pedras, rio Cuminá- Miri), 1 male, 1 female, 20-24.I.1968, Exp. Perm. Amaz. col. (MZSP).