Dinotrema subbidentatum Peris-Felipo, 2016

(Figs 39–41)

Dinotrema subbidentatum Peris-Felipo in Peris-Felipo and Belokobylskij 2016b: 10 .

Material examined. 1 female (holotype), Brazil, Sta. Cat., Nova Teutonia, 27.vii.1952 (F. Plaumann leg.) [B.M. 1957–341] (BMNH) ; 1 female (paratype), same locality as holotype, but, 27°11’B 52°23’L, 7.vi.1937 (F. Plaumann leg.) [B.M. 1937–656] (BMNH); 7 females, 5 males (paratypes), same locality as holotype, but, 29.v.1937, 19.viii.1937 [B.M. 1937–748], 30.iv.1938, 10.v.1938, 16.vi.1935, 25.viii.1935, 10.ix.1935, 8.iii.1936 (BMNH, ZISP); 1 male (paratype), same locality as holotype, but 27°B 52–58°L, 3.vi.1938 (F. Plaumann leg.) [B.M. 1938– 458] (BMNH); 55 females, 1 male (paratypes), same locality, but 24.iii.1941 [B.M. 1957–341], 12.viii.1941, 9.xi.1941, 12.ix.1941, 14.vii.1944, 17.vii.1944, 23.vii.1945, 19.iv.1952, 10.v.1952, 30.v.1952, 1.vi.1952, 2.vi.1952, 3.vi.1952, 5.vi.1952, 17.vii.1952, 27.vii.1952, 2.viii.1952, 23.x.1952, 26.ix.1952 (BMNH, ZISP); 1 female (paratype), Brazil, Paraná, Rondon, vii.1952 (Leg. F. Plaumann) [B.M. 1957–341] (BMNH) .

Description.: See Peris-Felipo and Belokobylskij (2016b).

Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to D. plaumanni Peris-Felipo 2016; differences between both species are shown after the redescription of the latter species.