Maechidius seriepunctatus Moser, 1920

Fig. 10

Additional material examined. 1 male (Fig. 10A): “Neu-Britannien / 20. [handwritten] Ralum [printed] 11.96 [handwritten] / E. Dahl S.” (ZMHB) .

Remarks. This specimen shows no differences from the lectotype described by Telnov (2020) and personally examined by myself. I did not study the genitalia of the lectotype and Telnov (2020) gave no description or figures of them. The aedeagus of a new specimen (Figs. 10B–C) is most similar to that in M. skalei Telnov, 2020 and M. woodlarkianus Heller, 1914, differing mainly by the tips of parameres more attenuated and curved in profile (cf. Telnov 2020: figs. 712–714, 742–744); however, both the compared species are very different externally. Spiculum gastrale was missing.