Amritodus brevis Viraktamath

Figs 9A–H, 60J, 63M–P.

Amritodus brevis Viraktamath 1997: 115–116, figs 32–41; Xue & Zhang 2020: 1446–1447, figs 4A–D, 13A–G.

Diagnosis. Male subgenital plate short about half as long as pygofer. Male style with apex not curved, setae on dorsal surface thinner and numerous. Aedeagus strongly sinuate in lateral view, preatrium slightly longer than shaft, shaft with pair of subapical triangular processes. Female sternite VII 4× as wide as medially long, lateral margins almost straight, lateral lobes directed posteriorly, posterior median margin with one additional lobe on either side of median line (Fig. 60J).

Material examined. HOLOTYPPE ♂, INDIA: Mizoram: Silchar, Gunghur, 18.xi.1981, C.S. Wesley Coll. (UASB). Paratype 1♀, data as for holotype (UASB).

Remarks. Viraktamath (1997) adequately described the species and also illustrated the male genitalia. Xue et al. (2020) diagnosed the species and illustrated the male and female genitalia based on specimens collected from China.