Ctenocharidotis nobiliata (Boheman, 1855)

Coptocycla nobiliata Boheman, 1855: 437 (original description).

Coptocycla Briseis Boheman, 1862: 412 (original description), syn. nov.

Type localities. Coptocycla briseis: ‘Brasilia’; Coptocycla nobiliata: ‘Brasilia’.

Type material examined. Coptocycla briseis: HOLOTYPE: pinned, ‘Type [w, p, s, c, rf] || Brazil [hw] | Baly Coll. | 1905—54. [w, p, cb] || Coptocycla | Briseis | Boh | Brazil [w, hw by Baly, cb] || Coll | Fry | Named by | Boheman | Type 126 [hw by Baly on underside of preceding label] ’ (BMNH).

Coptocycla nobiliata: HOLOTYPE: pinned, ‘ Rio Jan [w, p, s] || F. Sahlb. [w, p, cb] || Type. [w, p, s] || NHRS-JLKB | 000022074 [w, p, cb]’ (NHRS).

Remarks. BOHEMAN (1855) explicitly described Coptocycla nobiliata from a single specimen. I also assume that Coptocycla briseis was based on a single specimen according to the original description, due to its not fully sclerotized elytra and unusual colouration.

SPAETH (1926) studied a specimen compared with the type of C. briseis by G. E. Bryant and concluded that it is close to C. nobiliata, differing only in the sparser punctation of elytra. I have studied the holotype of C. briseis as well as the specimen compared by Bryant and both are teneral and not fully sclerotized. As a result, the punctation of elytra artificially appears sparser and finer than in C. nobiliata . Otherwise both taxa are identical and lead me to synonymize C. briseis with the latter species.

Distribution. Brazil: Rio de Janeiro (FLINTE et al. 2009).