Creagrura nigripes Townes, 1971

(Figs. 1 A-G; 2A-F; 3)

Creagrura nigripes Townes, 1971: 7 [original description]; Gauld, 2000: 45 [taxonomic review]. Female holotype, Brazil (EMUS) [Entomology Museum, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA] .

Diagnosis: This species can be distinguished by the combination of the following characters: mandible slightly twisted, with a wide ventral flap; scutellum with strongly raised lateral longitudinal carinae (Fig.1C);female with ovipositor very short, strongly curved downwards, being approximately 0.3 times as shorter as the hind tibia (Fig. 1A).

Material examined: 17 ♀♀ and 16 ♂♂. BRAZIL, AC [Acre], Bujari, F [loresta] ES[estadual] Antimary, 09°20′01″S, 68°19′17″W, 18-31.VII.2017, Malaise grande, E.F. Morato & J.A. Rafael cols., Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA) ; same, except 18-31. V.2017 (1 ♀, INPA); same, except 25.XII.2016, Sweeping. (1 ♂, INPA); same,except 25.VIII.2006, Focagem noturna, F.F. Xavier & D.M.M. Mendes cols., Rede BIA (1 ♂, 1 ♀, INPA); same, except 19.XI-03.XII.2016, Malaise grande, E.F. Morato & J.A. Rafael cols., Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA); same, except Cruzeiro do Sul, Rio Moa, 07°37′02″S, 72°46′15″W, 19-28.XI.1996, J.A. Rafael; J. Vidal & R. L. Menezes 0019241 (1 ♀, INPA). AP [Amapá], Serra do Navio Igarapé CachaÇo, 00°52′49.8″N, 52°01′05.6″W, 20.XI.2014, J.A. Rafael & F. F Xavier Fº leg., Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA). AM [Amazonas], Tefé, Várzea, 03°19′45″S, 64°41′13″W, 22.VIIII-05.IX.2017, Malaise,J.A. Oliveira,D.M.M. Mendes,J.A.Rafael cols., Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA); terra firme, 03°25′19″S, 64°37′05″W, 20-31. XII.2016, Malaise, J.A. Oliveira, D.M.M. Mendes, J.A. Rafael cols., Rede BIA (1 ♀, 1 ♂, INPA); same,except 25.I-08.II.2017 (1 ♀, INPA); same,except 01-21.VIII.2017 (1 ♀, INPA); Careiro Castanho, BR-319, km 181, Sítio São Paulo, 04°12′48″S, 60°49′04″W, Malaise grande, 10-24.IV.2017, J.A. Rafael & F.F. Xavier Fº leg., Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA) ; same, except 09-21.XI.2016 (1 ♀, INPA); Novo Airão, AM-352, km 68, Igarapé Mato Grosso, 02°48′58″S, 60°55′18″W, Malaise, 14-28.IX.2016, E.F. Morato & J.A. Rafael leg., Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA) ; Manaus, Área de Estudos PDBFF, Fazenda Florestal, Reserva 1112, 02°26′57″S, 59°46′13″W, 26.IV.1985, col. Bert Klein (3 ♂♂, INPA). PA [Pará], Santarém, BR-163, km 19, Ramal das Lavras, Sítio do Recanto do Sabiá, 02°35′13.0″S, 54°43′15.3″ W], 01-15.II.2019, M.L. Oliveira leg., Malaise grande – Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA) ; same, except 15-30. VI.2019, M.L. Oliveira leg Malaise grande, Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA); same, except 01-15.IV.2019, M.L. Oliveira leg., Arm [adilha]. Malaise pequena. Projeto Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA). RR [Roraima]- Amajari, Tepequém, SESC, 03°44′45″N, 61°43′40″W, 01-15.I.2016, R. Boldrini & J.A. Rafael, Malaise pequena, Rede BIA (1 ♀, INPA) ; same, except Malaise, 01-15.IV.2016, J.A. Rafael, R. Boldrini cols., Rede BIA (1 ♂, INPA) ; same, except 01-15.VIII.2016, R. Boldrini & J.A. Rafael, Malaise grande – Armadilha 02, Rede BIA (3 ♂♂, INPA); same, except Malaise, 14-29.XII.2015, R. Boldrini & J.A. Rafael leg. (2 ♂♂, INPA) ; same, except 01-15.X.2016, Boldrini & J.A. Rafael, Rede BIA (1 ♂, INPA); same, except 01-15.XII.2016, R. Boldrini & J.A. Rafael, Malaise pequena, Rede BIA (3 ♂♂, INPA); same, except Malaise, 01-15. VII.2016, J.A. Rafael, R. Boldrini cols., Rede BIA (1 ♂, INPA) .

Geographical records: Brazil (Acre *, Amapá *, Amazonas*, Pará*, Rio de Janeiro, Roraima *), Costa Rica, Ecuador, Peru, Suriname (Fig. 3).

Remarks: The males and females of Creagrura nigripes analyzed showed differences in size and color patterns (Figs. 1 A-G; 2A-F), with variation in the spots on the propodeum (Figs. 1 C-G; 2C-F) and on the hind coxae (Figs. 1 A-B; 2A-B). In addition, the median longitudinal carinae (Figs. 1G; 2F) behind the posterior transverse carina (Figs. 1D; 2D) are strongly marked in the propodeum of some specimens (Figs. 1 C-G; 2C-F). The variations of these characteristics had already been mentioned by Gauld (2000), who analyzed 87 specimens from Costa Rica, and we also treat them here as intraspecific variations. However, these differences deserve to be evaluated more in-depth in the future, using also molecular data as they can reveal the presence of cryptic species. In addition, a broader sampling of specimens in other environments and biomes is needed to characterize these variations more robustly.