Tentyria bifida Bujalance, Cárdenas, Ferrer & Gallardo, 2016 (Figs. 35, 69, 105, 140, 153, 185, 221)
Tentyria bifida Bujalance, Cárdenas, Ferrer & Gallardo, 2016: 350; Martínez 2018: 58, Iwan & L̂bl 2020: 248.
Types examined: Holotype ♁: Caño Mayor, Doñana N. P. (Huelva); 28.VII.2005, J.L. Bujalance leg. (MNCN). Paratypes: same data as the Holotype (11♁♁ and 21♀♀, CJLB) (1♁ and 1♀, CACT) (1♀, CJF) . Caño Mayor, Doñana N. P., 6.VII.2005, J.L. Bujalance leg. (5♁♁ and 3♀♀, CJLB) (2♁♁ and 1♀, CJF) ; El Charco de la Boca, Doñana N. P., 25.XI.2001, A. Cárdenas leg. (1♀, CUCO) ; 7.VIII.2001 (1 ex, CUCO); 30.VII.2001 (1♁ and 3♀♀, CUCO) . La Casa de la Pichiricha, Doñana N. P., 25.VI.2001 (3♁♁ and 1♀, CUCO) ; 16.VII.2001 (1♀, CUCO); 30.VII.2001 (17♁♁ and 23♀♀, CUCO); 6.VII.2001 (1♀, CUCO); 7.VIII.2001 (3♁♁ and 3♀♀, CUCO); 25.IX.2001 (2 exx, CUCO) . Matasgordas, Doñana N. P., 30.VII.2001 (5♁♁, 1♀, and 1 specimen, CUCO) .
Diagnosis: Body somewhat elongated (Fig. 221); smooth, black intense and bright tegument, particularly in the ventral side. Head (Fig. 35) shaped as in Tentyria platyceps Steven, subtriangular epistome slightly protruding forward, provided with a tooth at the middle; punctures quite fine but perceptible, not confluent and greater that in the pronotum; sub-right and transverse, well defined, broad and deep gular groove (Fig. 69), but not as deep than in T. platyceps; pronotum (Fig. 105) moderately transverse and convex, sided curved and narrowed towards the base, barely rounded and prolonged backward; posterior angles obtuse but discernible, punctures very fine and sparse; prosternal apophysis (Fig. 140) long and narrow, with the extreme bent upward in ventral view and surpassing backwards the level of procoxae. Protibiae not showing sexual dimorphism, with the margin right and progressively widened to the apex; elytra convex, smooth, punctures very fine, even more that in the pronotum, ovate and elongate, and almost as narrowed at the base as at the apex. Abdominal sternites smooth and bright, last urosternite with the apex bifid (Fig. 153). The aedeagus (Fig. 185) is small, with the parameres slightly strangled at the base and very curved in lateral view, conspicuously shorter and more curved than the phallobase.
Geographic distribution: Endemism from Doñana National Park (Huelva) (Bujalance et al. 2016).