Dasyvalgus rubrothoracicus Miyake Figure 6B

Dasyvalgus rubrothoracicus Miyake, 1993a: 23-24.

Note.

The holotype and following paratypes are deposited in RIEB (ex coll. Y. Miyake):

Holotype

(♂). '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi Phui / 21-IV-1985 / M. TAO leg. // Holotype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993'. (Fig. 6B)

Paratypes.

11 exs.: 1 ex. 'Doi Sutehp / Thailand / 28-IV-1985 / M Tao leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993'. 1 ♂ '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 1-V-1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993'. 1 ♂ '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 1-V-1985 / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993'. 1 ♂ '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 5-V-1985 / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993'. 1 ♂ '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 11-V-1985 / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993'. [[1 ♂ '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 17-V-1985 (the date given in the original description is 17-IV-1985) / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993']]. [[1 ♂ '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 21-V-1985 (the date given in the original description is 21-IV-1985) / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993']]. [[1 ♂ '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 21-V-1985 (the date given in the original description is 21-IV-1985) / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993']]. [[1 ♂'〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 23-V-1985 (the date given in the original description is 23-IV-1985) / M. TAO leg. // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993']]. [[2 ♂ '〔Thailand〕/ Pupin-Doi-Phui / 28-V-1985 (the date given in the original description is 28-IV-1985) / M. TAO leg. // TDvA // Paratype: Dasyvalgus / rubrothoracicus / Y. MIYAKE, 1993']].

Type condition.

The aedeagus of the holotype is pinned separately.

Current status.

Valid species.

Remark.

The date on the collecting data label of the holotype is 21-IV-1985, but the collecting date quoted in the original description is 5-V-1985. However, the habitus of the holotype and the figure in the original description match. Probably, Miyake caused a typographical error when writing the description.