Ophidiaster guildingi Gray, 1840
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4955.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E800A72A-C56A-492C-9EE6-FA4F8277DE31 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4701452 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FF6987EE-FF82-FFE6-FF54-43957E3FFBAC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ophidiaster guildingi Gray, 1840 |
status |
|
Ophidiaster guildingi Gray, 1840 View in CoL
Figures 26–27 View FIGURE 26 View FIGURE 27
Ophidiaster guildingii Gray, 1840: 284 .
Ophidiaster guildingii — Tommasi & Aron 1988: 3; Hendler et al. 1995: 79, fig. 22; Madeira et al. 2019: 93–94.
Ophidiaster guildingi View in CoL — Clark & Downey 1992: 281, fig. 44c, d, pl. 69A, B; Benavides-Serrato et al. 2011: 176; Sandino et al. 2017: S294; Borrero-Peìrez et al. 2019: 5; Cunha et al. 2020: 41 View Cited Treatment , fig. 6; Mah 2020b: 238 View Cited Treatment , fig. 18A–D.
Material examined (3 specs, 7–22 mm R). BRAZIL. Bahia, Abrolhos, Minerva Seamount (17°03’S, 37°37’W)— 69 m, 18.viii.2012, 3 specs, R GoogleMaps 7–22 mm ( MZUSP 2102 View Materials ) .
Comparative material. BRAZIL. Espírito Santo: Trindade Island (20°29’– 20°32’S; 29°19’– 29°20’W)— Enseada dos Portugueses, 12 m, 15.vii.2013, 1 spec, R GoogleMaps 9 mm ( MZUSP 1563 View Materials ); Enseada do Príncipe, Pedra da Garoupa , 10.4 m, 16.vii.2013, 1 spec, R 25 mm ( MZUSP 1576 View Materials ); Enseada das Orelhas , 8.9 m, 8.i.2015, 1 spec, R 62 mm ( MZUSP 1570 View Materials ) .
Description of largest specimens (R 17–22 mm). Disc small; average R/r 4.9 ( Fig. 26A–B View FIGURE 26 ). Five long, cylindrical, constricted at base. Madreporite subcircular ( Fig. 26D View FIGURE 26 ), evident in interradial area. Anus conspicuous in center of disc, surrounded by 10 spines. Terminal plate round, smaller than arm diameter, with about 8 tubercles ( Fig. 26G View FIGURE 26 ). Abactinal plates ( Fig. 26C View FIGURE 26 ) cruciform, imbricated, covered by flattened granules, and arranged in seven regular rows. Papular areas forming regular rows parallel to abactinal plates; with 4–8 pores proximally ( Fig. 26C View FIGURE 26 ) and 3–5 pores distally. Marginal plates similar to abactinal plates. One row of imbricate actinal plates; actinal papular areas with 4–6 papular pores ( Fig. 26H View FIGURE 26 ). Each inferomarginal plate connected to two adjacent actinal plates via a rod-like plate. One row of adambulacral spines, two subequal spines per plate ( Fig. 26F View FIGURE 26 ). One subambulacral spine per plate; spine flattened, tapering, twice as large as adambulacral spine. Space between adambulacral and subambulacral spines ( Fig. 26E View FIGURE 26 ). Oral spines ( Fig. 26E View FIGURE 26 ) similar to adambulacral spines. Tube feet in two rows, sucking disc with perforated plates. Pedicellariae absent.
Ontogenetic variation (R 7 mm). Average R/r 2.3. The specimen has short and wide arms, not constricted at the base ( Fig. 27A–B View FIGURE 27 ), and a relatively large terminal plate forming the tip of the arm ( Fig. 27G View FIGURE 27 ). The number of spines, tubercles, and papular areas are reduced in some areas, the anus is surrounded by 7–9 spines, terminal plates have 4–5 tubercles, papular areas have 1–3 pores in the abactinal region, and 1–2 pores in the actinal region. Also, abactinal plates are round and not imbricated ( Fig. 27C View FIGURE 27 ), and adambulacral spines equal ( Fig. 27E View FIGURE 27 ).
Coloration. No record of coloration of in vivo specimens from this region, but specimens from Trindade Island are dark brown ( Cunha et al. 2020). Juveniles from the Caribbean are purple ( Hendler et al. 1995). Specimens in ethanol are pale brown.
Distribution. Eastern Atlantic: Cape Verde, Gulf of Guinea, Ascension Island. Western Atlantic: U.S.A. (FL, GA, TX), Bermuda, The Bahamas, Mexico, Cuba, Belize, Turks and Caicos, Anguilla, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Trinidad and Tobago, Antilles, Nicaragua, Panama, Colombia ( Pawson 1978; Clark & Downey 1992; Entrambasaguas 2003; Sandino et al. 2017; Borrero-Peìrez et al. 2019; Mah 2020b). BRAZIL: Bahia, Trindade Island, Rio Grande do Sul ( Tommasi 1970; Carrera-Rodriguez & Tommasi 1977; Tommasi & Aron 1988; Cunha et al. 2020). Depth. 0–445 m ( Mah 2020b).
Biological notes. In Bahia, this species is found in rubble and coral reef ecosystems, calcareous rocks and gravel ( Tommasi & Aron 1988). Although O. guildingi is not widely distributed, it is generally abundant locally. Ophidiaster guildingi is a slow-moving species ( Hendler et al. 1995) and can reproduce asexually and regenerate a new individual from a single arm ( Haeckel 1878). The specimens from Bahia did not show signs of asexual reproduction.
Holotype. The type specimen of O. guildingi has not been found ( Clark & Downey 1992).
Type locality. St Thomas, Virgin Islands ( Clark & Downey 1992).
Remarks. This species is generally small, growing only up to R 62 mm; according to H.L. Clark (1933), O. guildingi reaches maturity at R 45 mm. As noted above, the number of pores per papular area varies with ontogeny. Specimens from Trindade Island with R 9 mm have 1–2 pores, with R 25 mm have 3–6 pores and with R 62 mm have 5–12 pores. At R 33 mm, specimens have 5–12 pores ( Downey 1973), and the maximum number of pores is 15 ( Clark & Downey 1992). Clark & Downey (1992) also noted the rare occurrence of pedicellariae in large specimens, but Cunha et al. (2020) did not find pedicellariae in the specimens from Trindade Island.
Ophidiaster guildingi differs from O. alexandri , O. bullisi and O. reyssi by having only one row of actinal plates (vs. 3–5 rows in O. alexandri ; two rows in O. bullisi ; and four rows in O. reyssi ); from O. bayeri by having only one row of subambulacral spines (vs. two rows); from O. ophidianus by having up to 15 pores per papular area (vs. more than 20 pores) and flat and tapering spines subambulacral spines (vs. cylindrical and blunt) ( Clark 1921; Clark & Downey 1992; Madeira et al. 2019).
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ophidiaster guildingi Gray, 1840
Cunha, Rosana, Martins, Luciana, Menegola, Carla & Souto, Camilla 2021 |
Ophidiaster guildingi
Cunha, R. & Tavares, M. & Mendonca, J. B. 2020: 41 |
Mah, C. L. 2020: 238 |
Benavides-Serrato, M. & Borrero-Perez, G. & Diaz-Sanchez, C. 2011: 176 |
Clark, A. M. & Downey, M. E. 1992: 281 |
Ophidiaster guildingii
Madeira, P. & Kroh, A. & Cordeiro, R. & Frias, D. E. & Martins, A. M. & Avila, S. P. 2019: 93 |
Hendler, G. & Muller, J. E. & Pawson, D. L. & Kier, P. M. 1995: 79 |
Tommasi, L. R. & Aron, M. A. 1988: 3 |
Ophidiaster guildingii
Gray, J. E. 1840: 284 |