Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5167.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4C140613-04F6-4227-B084-45851F42E039 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6903080 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FB3C87F1-F238-AC4E-FF67-FA89FE27ABFA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931 |
status |
|
Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931
( Figs 130 View FIGURE 130 , 131 View FIGURE 131 ) (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11405328)
Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931: 62 ; Gussakovskij, 1935: 174, 375; Verzhutskij, 1966: 27; Beneš, 1974: 303, 311; Shinohara, 1995: 55; Zhelochovtsev & Zinovjev, 1995: 398; Shinohara, 2002b: 426; Shinohara, 2004: 263; Shinohara & Lelej, 2007: 936, 942; Taeger et al., 2010: 91; Sundukov & Lelej, 2012: 109; Sundukov, 2017: 106; Lee et al., 2019: 11 View Cited Treatment ; Shinohara, 2019: 12; Shinohara, 2020: 20, 249.
See Shinohara (1995) for more references.
Lectotype designation. Malaise (1931) described this species based on “ 2♂♂ und 2♀♀ aus Klutchi, Kamtchatka ” but did not designate a holotype. We hereby designate the female labeled “Typus” in Malaise’s collection (NHRS), as lectotype. It is labeled “ Kamtschatka, Malaise” “Typus” “ Pamphilius virescens Mal. Type Malaise det.” “818”. It was treated as the holotype by Beneš (1974) and Shinohara (1995) and fully redescribed by Beneš (1974).
Material examined. Thirteen specimens, including the lectotype, of which 12 are from the Russian Far East and South Korea (Shinohara 1995; present work). New collection data: SOUTH KOREA: Gangwon-do : 1♀, Mirugam (Bukdaesa), 1300m, Odaesan Mts., 1. VI . 2002, A. Shinohara ( NSMT) .
Distribution. Russia (Kamchatka Kraj, Irkutsk Oblast). South Korea. Japan (Hokkaido).
Host plant. Unknown.
Remarks. This species is known from a small number of specimens (Shinohara 1995) and no molecular data are available. It belongs to the P. gyllenhali subgroup of the P. histrio group ( Shinohara 2002b). Lee et al. (2019) gave Salix sp. as a host of this species without showing the source of information. Verzhutskij (1966) speculated that the host of P. virescens was Salix . As discussed by Shinohara (1995), this host record may be correct, but no decisive evidence is available.
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
NSMT |
National Science Museum (Natural History) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pamphilius virescens Malaise, 1931
Shinohara, Akihiko, Kramp, Katja & Taeger, Andreas 2022 |
Pamphilius virescens
Shinohara, A. 2020: 20 |
Lee, J. - W. & Choi, J. - K. & Park, B. 2019: 11 |
Sundukov, Yu. N. 2017: 106 |
Sundukov, Yu. N. & Lelej, A. S. 2012: 109 |
Taeger, A. & Blank, S. M. & Liston, A. D. 2010: 91 |
Shinohara, A. & Lelej, A. S. 2007: 936 |
Shinohara, A. 2002: 426 |
Zhelochovtsev, A. N. & Zinovjev, A. G. 1995: 398 |
Benes, K. 1974: 303 |
Verzhutskij, B. N. 1966: 27 |
Gussakovskij, V. V. 1935: 174 |
Malaise, R. 1931: 62 |