Oeonus Godman, 1900

Zhang, Jing, Dolibaina, Diego R., Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Song, Leina, Mielke, Carlos G. C., Casagrande, Mirna M., Mielke, Olaf H. H. & Grishin, Nick V., 2023, Taxonomic notes on Neotropical Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera), Zootaxa 5271 (1), pp. 91-114 : 98

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5271.1.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:39D641B7-1800-4918-8E88-4EC5FF4BB56C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7864298

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F84A87F4-9B31-FFC4-FF3C-A034BBFEF9E5

treatment provided by

Plazi (2023-04-24 10:09:35, last updated 2024-11-26 03:39:09)

scientific name

Oeonus Godman, 1900
status

stat. nov.

Oeonus Godman, 1900 View in CoL , new status, is a subgenus of Oxynthes Godman, 1900

Oeonus Godman, 1900 View in CoL -XI (type species Oeonus pyste Godman, 1900 View in CoL ) clusters closely with Oxynthes Godman, 1900 View in CoL -X (type species Goniloba corusca Herrich-Schäffer, 1869 View in CoL ) in the genomic tree ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 blue). COI barcode difference between the type species of these two genera is 9.6% (63 bp). Genetic differentiation between Oeonus View in CoL and Oxynthes View in CoL is approximately the same as between Orthos orthos View in CoL and Orthos minka View in CoL that were formerly considered conspecific ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 magenta and green). Both Oeonus View in CoL and Oxynthes View in CoL include a small number of species and are not separated from each other by a prominent break (i.e, longer internal branches) comparable to that separating them both from Testia Grishin, 2019 . Therefore, we propose to treat these species as congeneric and place Oeonus View in CoL , stat. nov. as a subgenus of Oxynthes View in CoL .

Herrich-Schaffer, G. A. W. (1869) Prodromus systematis lepidopterorum. Versuch einer systematischen Anordnung der Schmetterlinge. Correspondenz-Blatt des zoologisch-mineralogischen Vereines in Regensburg, 23, 184 - 204.

Gallery Image

FIGURE 4. Nuclear genome tree of selected Carystina and Hesperiina. The tree is constructed from protein-coding regions. Statistical support values are shown by nodes. For each specimen, its name adopted in this work is given first, and a previously used name is listed in square brackets (if different), supplemented with the DNA sample number, type status, general locality, year of collection (when known), and, for primary type specimens, their repository. Synonyms are given in parentheses preceded by “=”, and in addition by “‡” for unavailable names. The type status refers to this synonym, if the synonym name is provided. Green vertical bar cuts the tree into genera, except Vertica, which is characterized by lower evolutionary rate (leaves are closer to the root compared to most others). Yellow shading denotes genera and its width (horizontal dimension) is proportional to the genetic differentiation within each genus. Taxa discussed in the text are shown in different colors: Carystus elvira (orange), Orthos minka, stat. nov. (green), Orthos orthos (purple), Orthos hyalinus, stat. rest. (olive), Oxynthes (blue, subgenus Oeonus labeled in dark blue), Lindra neroides, comb. nov. (red, neotype labeled in margenta), Lindra brasus (cyan), and Decinea (gray).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Hesperiidae

SubTribe

Hesperiina