Lepidocyrtus olena Christiansen & Bellinger, 1992

Bernard, Ernest C., Soto-Adames, Felipe N. & Wynne, J. Judson, 2015, Collembola of Rapa Nui (Easter Island) with descriptions of five endemic cave-restricted species, Zootaxa 3949 (2), pp. 239-267 : 254-257

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3949.2.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F678EF65-50F2-4B30-BDFD-A1DF3295D144

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5631737

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F80287CD-FFF8-4256-21B6-B493FD39F9DF

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Lepidocyrtus olena Christiansen & Bellinger, 1992
status

 

Lepidocyrtus olena Christiansen & Bellinger, 1992

Figs. 7 View FIGURE 7 E, 10‒11; Table 2 View TABLE 2

Material examined. CHILE, Rapa Nui, Maunga Hiva Hiva region, Cave Q 15 -074, baited pitfall trap 2 A, 3.VII. 2009, J. Wynne, 1 female on slide and 1 female in alcohol; 3 females, same locality data but in fern-moss garden, 1 on slide and 2 in ethanol.

Description. Size to 1.3 mm. Background color creamy white, with purple pigment limited to eye patch and antennae ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 E). Scales distributed on head, body and ventral face of furcula.

Apical bulb of Ant. IV absent; subapical sense organ not seen. Sense organ of Ant. III with 2 normal thinwalled rods. Eye patch with eyes G and H subequal and smaller than others. Eye patch valley setae not seen. Dorsal head macrosetae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 A) limited to A0, Pa 5, and 8‒9 in series An. Anterior head microsetae fusiform and ciliate, posterior microsetae acuminate and smooth. Prelabral and all labral setae smooth. Distal margin of labrum smooth. Outer maxillary lobe with basal and distal setae smooth and subequal; sublobal plate with 4 setae. Lateral appendage of labial papilla E slender, bent anteriorly and reaching tip of papilla. Proximal labial setae smooth. Labial triangle ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 B, C) setae as M 1 M 2 rEL 1 L 2 A 1-5: M 2 larger than M 1, which is larger than r. Distribution of postlabial setae as in Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 B: setae on anterior row smooth, setae on posterior rows ciliate; 2 lateral microsetae reduced and smooth.

Body with dorsal macrosetal formula 00/0223+ 1 + 7. Mesothoracic hood produced anteriorly, blunt ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 E); posterior row with 6 setae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 D). Chaetotaxy of metathorax complete (cf. Szeptycki 1979). First abdominal segment with a 6 and 10 posterior setae. Second abdominal segment ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 G) with macrosetae m 3 and m 5; supplementary setae associated with bothriotricha m 2 and a 5 fan-shaped; m 4 i and p 5 p absent; a 2 ciliate; a 2 p and all other normal setae present and smooth; a 3 anterior to sensillum as. Abd. III ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 H) setae mi, ml, and a 2 broad fans; a 3 anterior and barely reaching sensillum as; sensillum as thicker than usual and about half the length of m 3; setae p 3, p 4, p 5 and d 2 normal; Li, Lm, Ll, a 6, im, em, and am 6 broad fans; a 7 smooth, detached from bothriotrichal complex. Fourth abdominal segment ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ) with 4 inner (B 4, B 5, B 6, C 1) and 9 latero-anterior (D 2, D 3, E 1, E 2, E 3, E 4, F 1, F 2, F 3) macrosetae, E 1 and E 4 smaller than others; supplementary seta s present, all supplementary setae fan-shaped, D 1 longest; T 3 and D 1 p almost in row, closer to bothriotrix T 2 than to T 4; macroseta F 2 in arch with D 2 and E 2; posterior setae 12‒13.

Trochanteral organ with at least 12 setae. Metatibiotarsi without outstanding posterior setae. Tenent hair spatulate. Unguis ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 F) with 4 inner teeth, basal pair slightly sequential rather than strictly paired, teeth inserted at 39 %, 42 %, 67 % and 86 % of inner edge. Unguiculus truncate on all legs, posterior edge smooth. On ventral tube, distal row of anterior face with 2 macrosetae; lateral flaps and posterior face not seen. Manubrial plate of furcula with 3 inner and 4‒5 outer setae. Dens tubercle absent. Mucro ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 E) with apical tooth longer than subapical; basal spine denticulate.

Remarks. Lepidocyrtus olena belongs to the L. nigrosetosus Folsom, 1927 species group, characterized by a blunt, anteriorly produced mesothoracic hood, no head macroseta between A0 and Pa 5, anterior row of postlabial setae smooth, 4 inner macrosetae on Abd. IV and truncate prothoracic unguiculus. Lepidocyrtus olena can be separated from the reasonably well-described members of this species group by the presence of ciliate labial triangle setae M 1 and r, presence of Abd. II seta m 3 e, and absence of dental tubercle. Of the the small sized (less than 2 mm long) members of the L. nigrosetosus group, L. olena is most similar, and may be a junior synonym of L. gaeyi Denis, 1924 from French Guiana or L. schmidti Handschin, 1927 from Costa Rica; the three species differ only in that L. gaeyi and L. schmidti have three inner ungual teeth. These three species are otherwise identical in all characters described. Of the large size (more than 2.5 mm long) members of the L. nigrosetosus group, the individuals from Rapa Nui are most similar to L. nigrosetosus , L. immaculatus Folsom, 1932 and L. leleupi Jacquemart, 1976 , but the characters listed above distinguish the species. Christiansen and Bellinger (1992) suggested that L. olena might refer to morphologically distinct juveniles of L. immaculatus and thus, not a valid species. However, one of the individuals of L. olena examined is an adult female and the differences with L. immaculatus remain; L. immaculatus has a dental appendage and L. olena does not. In species with dental appendage, the structure is present even in very young juveniles.

Table 2 View TABLE 2 summarises the diagnostic differences between all species listed above. Most species belonging to the L. nigrosetosus group are poorly described and putative diagnostic characters are uncertain. The small species described by Denis (1924) and Handschin (1927) are so poorly characterised by current standards that no detailed comparison is possible. The larger members of the group also are difficult to distinguish, and in fact L. leleupi may be a junior synonym of L. nigrosetosus , differing consistently only in colour pattern, whereas the only character separating L. immaculatus from L. nigrosetosus is the number of setae along the ventral head groove ( Table 2 View TABLE 2 ).

The presence in Rapa Nui caves of a species originally described from Hawaiʻi may seem unexpected. However, members of the L. nigrosetosus species group appear to be tropical generalists that are easily transported as a result of human economic activities. It is not even certain that L. olena is native to Hawaiʻi. As mentioned above, other members of the L. nigrosetosus group occur in Central and South America and the Caribbean region. It is possible that colonization of both Rapa Nui and Hawaiʻi by L. olena might have been mediated by ancient Polynesians transporting plants (e.g., banana, sugarcane, taro, etc.) as they colonized eastward across the south Pacific ( Wynne et al. 2014). Alternatively, colonization may have occurred more recently within shipments of ornamental or agricultural plants from the South American continent.

a Sources: Christiansen & Bellinger 1992 ( L. olena ); Mari Mutt 1986 ( L. nigrosetosus ); Jacquemart 1976 ( L. leleupi ); Denis 1924 ( L. gaeyi ); Handschin 1927 ( L. schmidti ).

TABLE 2. Diagnostic table for New World and Hawaiian species of Lepidocyrtus without dorsal head macrochaetae posterior to A 0 but with smooth prelabral and anterior postlabial setae and truncate prothoracic unguiculus.

Species a Leg scales Labial seta m1 Labial seta r Setae along ventral groove
olena coxa only ciliate ciliate 4
immaculatus femur smooth reduced conic 4
nigrosetosus femur smooth or ciliate reduced conic 5–6
leleupi femur ciliate reduced conic 5–6
gaeyi ? ?? ?
schmidti ? ?? ?
continued.