Paraliparis membranaceus Günther, 1887
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2014.73 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3868149 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F442953B-2E52-EF4D-FF54-FDFEFEAF7DD9 |
treatment provided by |
Tatiana |
scientific name |
Paraliparis membranaceus Günther, 1887 |
status |
|
Paraliparis membranaceus Günther, 1887 View in CoL
– No common name
The holotype of P. membranaceus was caught on the 10 th of January 1876, off Cabo San Vicente, Sarmiento Channel, Chile, BMNH 1887.12.7.20, “Challenger” Sta. 310, 74.0500º W, 51.4583º S. GoogleMaps
According to Stein (2005), information on the collection area was obscure but unequivocal ( Murray 1895). Over time, erroneous reports of the occurrence of P. membranaceus accumulated in literature. In fact, Günther’s (1887) description omitted mentioning that it was from Chile (“... off Cape St. Vincent, Station 310 ...”). Subsequent authors did not verify the actual collection data, and even the Natural History Museum online catalogue included incorrect collection data that have subsequently been corrected ( Stein 2005). Burke (1930) also omitted the information that the specimen was from the fjord waters of southern Chile, and Nobre (1935) and Albuquerque (1954 –1956) referred to Günther and Burke. Still later, Lindberg (1973) misinterpreted “Cape St. Vincent ” as meaning “off Portugal ”, i.e. the Cape St. Vincent, which is the best known geographic feature of the south coast of Portugal. Stein & Able (1986) cited Lindberg. The species P. membranaceus was omitted from the reviews of Chilean liparids ( Stein et al. 1991) and of Southern Ocean species ( Andriashev 1998, 2003). The P. membranaceus record off mainland Portugal is erroneous. For this reason this species is not included in this list.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |