Brueelia robertrankini, Gustafsson & Najer & Zou & Bush, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2022.800.1683 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:213B577F-867D-4ECD-AD2C-48ACA71801B5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6358715 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A7B7512D-23D8-4904-857A-F97A1077C631 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:A7B7512D-23D8-4904-857A-F97A1077C631 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Brueelia robertrankini |
status |
sp. nov. |
Brueelia robertrankini sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A7B7512D-23D8-4904-857A-F97A1077C631
Figs 64–70 View Figs 64–65 View Figs 66–70
Diagnosis
Brueelia robertrankini sp. nov. is most similar to Br. colindalei sp. nov., with which it shares the medianly pointed proximal mesosome ( Figs 69 View Figs 66–70 , 90 View Figs 87–91 ), the rounded pentagonal head ( Figs 66 View Figs 66–70 , 87 View Figs 87–91 ), and most characters of the abdominal chaetotaxy ( Figs 64–65 View Figs 64–65 , 85–86 View Figs 85–86 ). These two species can be separated by the following characters: abdominal segment IV in males without ps in Br. robertrankini sp. nov. ( Fig. 64 View Figs 64–65 ), but with ps in Br. colindalei sp. nov. ( Fig. 85 View Figs 85–86 ); male tergopleurite VIII without tps in Br. robertrankini sp. nov. ( Fig. 64 View Figs 64–65 ), but with tps in Br. colindalei sp. nov. ( Fig. 85 View Figs 85–86 ); female abdominal segment IV in Br. robertrankini sp. nov. with ps ( Fig. 65 View Figs 64–65 ), but without ps in Br. colindalei sp. nov. ( Fig. 86 View Figs 85–86 ); proximal mesosome and mesosomal lobes on different shapes ( Figs 69 View Figs 66–70 , 90 View Figs 87–91 ); parameres much longer in Br. robertrankini sp. nov. ( Fig. 68 View Figs 66–70 ) than in Br. colindalei sp. nov. ( Fig. 89 View Figs 87–91 ); female genitalia of Br. colindalei sp. nov. imperfectly known (see below), but subgenital plate appears to be broader and vulval margin more rounded in Br. robertrankini sp. nov. ( Fig. 70 View Figs 66–70 ) than in Br. colindalei sp. nov. ( Fig. 91 View Figs 87–91 ).
Etymology
The species name is in honor of the British author Robert Rankin (not to be confused with the other Robert Rankin), as a heartfelt thank-you for the many far-fetched books he has written. These have provided the first author with endless joy over the last decades; moreover, it is a fact well known to those who know it well that 2021 marks the 40 th anniversary of Rankin as a published author. Thus, given the specific name of the host, an associated louse named Brueelia robertrankini sp. nov. seems apropos, if you know what we mean (and we are sure that you do).
Material examined
Holotype (ex Pycnonotus jocosus jocosus) THAILAND • ♂; Chieng Mai Province , Doi Pha Hom Pok; 24 Nov. 1965; Maps. 2712; BPBM.
Paratypes (ex Pycnonotus jocosus pattani) CHINA • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀; Guangxi Province, Shiwandashan National Park ; 4 May 2005; [S.E.] Bush and [D.H.] Clayton leg.; MBR-6761 ; P-783 ; PIPR • 1 ♂; same locality, date and collectors as for preceding; MBR-6758 ; P-776 ; PIPR • 1 ♀; same locality and collectors as for preceding; 23 Apr. 2005; MBR-6704 ; P- 946 ; PIPR [slide also contains an unidentified Brueelia s. str. ♀] • 1 ♀; same locality and collector as for preceding; TJD-6231 ; P-948 ; PIPR .
Type host
Pycnonotus jocosus jocosus ( Linnaeus, 1758) – red-whiskered bulbul.
Other hosts
Pycnonotus jocosus pattani Deignan, 1948.
Description
Both sexes
Head convex rounded pentagonal ( Fig. 66 View Figs 66–70 ), lateral margins of preantennal area convex, frons flattened to slightly concave. Marginal carina gradually narrowing anteriorly, moderately displaced and translucent but not widened at osculum; lateral sections with distinct undulations of median margins. Ventral anterior plate flattened oval, with brown pigmentation. Head chaetotaxy as in Fig. 66 View Figs 66–70 ; pos located far behind eye. Temples rounded, occiput convex. Thoracic and abdominal segments as in Figs 64–65 View Figs 64–65 . Pigmentation generally very pale brown, except marginal and temporal marginal carinae, preantennal, preocular, and postocular nodi, proepimera, metepisterna, and lateral tergopleurites moderate brown.
Male
Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 64 View Figs 64–65 . Basal apodeme short ( Fig. 67 View Figs 66–70 ), constricted at midlength, with straight anterior margin. Proximal mesosome broad, anterior margin convergent to median point, its distal constriction creating small lateral protrusions ( Fig. 69 View Figs 66–70 ). Mesosomal lobes broad, somewhat elongated, with moderately rugose postero-median margins; 2 pmes sensilla latero-distal to gonopore. Gonopore crescent shaped, with distal margin deeply concave; no lateral extensions. Penile arms reach distal to mesosomal lobes. Parameres elongated distally, narrowing markedly near distal tips; pst1–2 as in Fig. 68 View Figs 66–70 . Measurements as in Table 1 View Table 1 .
Female
Thoracic and abdominal chaetotaxy as in Fig. 65 View Figs 64–65 . Subgenital plate barrel-shaped, with almost quadratic anterior half ( Fig. 70 View Figs 66–70 ), distal connection to cross-piece broad. Vulval margin gently rounded ( Fig. 70 View Figs 66–70 ), with 2–3 short, slender vms and 4–7 short, thorn-like vss on each side; 3–4 short, slender vos on each side of subgenital plate; distal 1 vos median to vss. Measurements as in Table 1 View Table 1 .
Remarks
No significant differences have been found between material from the two host subspecies.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |