Campylocera caudata ( Hendel, 1914 ), 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1515/vzoo-2016-0024 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6461890 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D643EF61-FFC8-3352-FF2F-FCA276ACF98D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2022-04-12 16:06:53, last updated 2024-11-26 23:55:19) |
scientific name |
Campylocera caudata ( Hendel, 1914 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Campylocera caudata ( Hendel, 1914) , comb. n. ( fig. 18–21 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig )
Hypotyphla caudata Hendel, 1914: 99 View in CoL ; Steyskal, 1980: 559. — Lygiohypotyphla hyalipennis Vanschuytbroeck, 1963: 43 View in CoL ; Steyskal, 1980: 559, syn. n. — Lygiohypotyphla ruwenzoriensis Vanschuytbroeck, 1963: 45 View in CoL ; Steyskal, 1980: 559, syn. n.
M a t e r i a l. Type. Holotype ♀ Hypotyphla caudata : [ Ghana]: “ Obuasi / Ashanti / W. Africa / 14. VIII. 1907 / Dr. W. M. Graham / 1908–245”, “Caught on leave of hedge 6 p. m.”, “ Hypotyphla /caucata H. / det. Hendel ”, “Type ♀” [red-boarded circle], “Holo- / type” [red-boarded circle], “Holotype Hypotyphla caudata Hendel verified by J. E. Chainey, 2002”, “BMNH (E) # 252204” ( BMNH).
Holotype Ơ Lygiohypotyphla hyalipennis: DR Congo: [ Virunga National Park ] “S[outh of] L[ake] Edouard: R[iver] Rwindi / (1000 m) 4-II-1936 / L. Lippens / Parc National Albert”, “ Vanschuytbroeck det., 195… / Lygiohypotyphla / hyalipennis n. sp. ”, “ HOLOTYPUS ” [orange label with frame], “Type” [pink label with frame], “ Campylocera caudata Hendel V. Korneyev det. 2006” ( MRAC) . Paratypes Lygiohypotyphla hyalipennis: DR Congo : 1 ♀, “Musée du Congo / Semliki: Mutwanga / Beni, 1932 / Dr Van Hoof”, “ Lygiohypotyphla ♀ / hyalipennis n. sp. / Dr. M. Aczél det. 19…”, “INST. M. LILLO / Preparación № 246 — W”, “ Vanschuytbroeck det., 195… / Lygiohypotyphla / hyalipennis n. sp. ”, “ PARATYPUS ” [orange label with frame] ( MRAC) ; 1 ♀, “ Congo belge, P. [arc] N. [ational de la] G. [aramba] / Miss. H. De Saeger / II/fd/17, 27-VIII-[19]52 / H. De Saeger. 3983”, “Para- / type” [orange label], “ Campylocera caudata Hendel V. Korneyev det. 2006” ( KBIN) .
Holotype Ơ Lygiohypotyphla ruwenzoriensis: DR Congo: [ Virunga National Park ] “ Congo Belge: P. [arc] N. [ational] A. [lbert] / 16-XI-1957 / P. Vanschuytbroeck / VS-230a”, “Massif Ruwenzori / Vallée Mont Mulungu / 2.400 m ”, “ Vanschuytbroeck det., 195… / Lygiohypotyphla / ruwenzoriensis n. sp. ”, “prep. No 67”, “ HOLOTYPUS ” [orange label with frame], “Type” [pink label with frame], “ Campylocera caudata Hendel V. Korneyev det. 2006” ( MRAC) . Paratype ♀: DR Congo: [ Virunga National Park ], “ Congo Belge: P. [arc] N. [ational] A. [lbert] / 29-VIII-1956 / P. Vanschuytbroeck / VS 488”, “Massif Ruwenzori / riv. Lume (moyenne) / affl. Semliki / 1.830 m ”, “ Vanschuytbroeck det., 195… / Lygiohypotyphla / ruwenzoriensis n. sp. ♀ ”, “Para- / type” [orange label], “ Campylocera caudata Hendel V. Korneyev det. 2006” ( KBIN) .
Non-type. [ Ghana]: “///Obuasi / 7.1907 / c[aptured] on bath near lamp 8 p. m. Dr. W. M. Graham ”, “Pres. Com. Inst. Ent. B. M. 1957 — 303”, 1 ♀ ( BMNH) . Cameroon: Balgom , rég. Ramoun ( MHNP) . Uganda: Ankole , Kichwamba, 1– 5.05.1968, 2 ♀ (P. J. Spangler) ( USNM) ; Kikondo Forest , 0.34755° S, 31.87017º E, h = 1153 m, forest near Lake Victoria, Malaise trap, 25.04– 9.05.2007, 1 Ơ, 1 ♀, 23.05– 6.06.2007, 1 Ơ (R. Copeland) ( NMKE) GoogleMaps .
D i a g n o s i s. C. caudata is a peculiar, moderately large (wing length 7.5– 12 mm) species with long abdomen in both sexes; it can be differentiated from other species of the genus from the combination of entirely reddish yellow body, elongate pedicel, long, apically bluntly rounded and parallel-sided flagellomere 1, short and blunt, subshining ocellar triangle with 2 ocellar setae, parafacial narrower than flagellomere 1; prosternum with 4–5 short setulae, proepisternum with 5–6 setae; scapular seta twice as long as setulae; presutural supra-alar seta present or lacking; scutellum with 4 setae, short setulose; wing slightly darkened along anterior margin and crossvein dm-cu or entirely hyaline with grey microtrichia; vein R 2+3 without or rarely with very short stump vein, vein R 4+5 dorsally often with 3–7 setulae at base ( fig. 18 View Fig , 3 View Fig ); femora ventrally moderately short setose, with subbasal ventral (longest) seta longer than femur width ( fig. 18 View Fig , 8–10 View Fig View Fig View Fig ); apicoventral setae moderathely thickened; female mid coxa with 2 thickened setae laterally and comb of 10–15 thick black setae medioventrally (brown ciliae in male); hind coxa with dense, thickened and short black setae forming flat brush ( fig. 18 View Fig , 7 View Fig ) (in male with numerous thin brown setulae — fig. 21 View Fig , 6 View Fig ); female abdomen long, with wide sternites ( fig. 19 View Fig , 6 View Fig ); oviscape long and narrow, curved anteroventrally ( fig. 18 View Fig , 19 View Fig , 5 View Fig ), more than 1.4× as long as abdominal tergites combined and without sclerotized lobes or long sensillar brushes or combs at its apical aperture; aculeus ( fig. 19 View Fig , 7 View Fig ) elongate, slightly longer than oviscape width at aperture ( fig. 19 View Fig , 5 View Fig ). Male abdomen long, with narrow sternites ( fig. 19 View Fig , 1 View Fig ); genitalia ( fig. 19 View Fig , 2–4 View Fig View Fig View Fig ): epandrium globose, bare, cerci moderately short, long setose ( fig. 19 View Fig , 2 View Fig ), inner and outer surstyli long, bar-like, attached anteroventrally and directed posteriorly, outer surstyli short spinulose as in most Adapsiliina , and inner surstyli with numerous apico-ventral setulae, but without prensisetae ( fig. 19 View Fig , 3 View Fig ); vanes of phallapodeme delta-like, basally widened ( fig. 19 View Fig , 2 View Fig ); phallus glans as on fig. 19 View Fig , 4 View Fig .
It shares narrow parafacial, shape of antenna, long scapular seta, lacking presutural supra-alar seta, 4 scutellar setae and very long and narrow oviscape with C. gracilis and C. loewi , differing from them by larger size, and much more setulose mid and hind coxa (in females C. gracilis and C. loewi at most with sparse setulae).
R e m a r k. Vanschuytbroeck (1963) described Lygiohypotyphla hyalipennis ( fig. 20 View Fig ) and L. ruwenzoriensis ( fig. 21 View Fig ) based on series of males and females from Ruwenzori (North-Eastern Congo) without a comparison with C. caudata or to each other. Th ey show no essential differences except some variation in size and coloration (some specimens are either teneral or pinned after keeping in alcohol). Vestiture of femora shows certain variability even among specimens from Eastern Africa (thin, long and dense setulae in larger females and moderately long and less conspicuous in smaller specimens). Otherwise, all the Eastern African specimens do not show any essential differences from the specimens from Ghana and Cameroon and I consider them conspecific, and establish synonymy as given above.
The nominal genus Hypotyphlina Enderlein, 1942 syn. n. is considered a part of Campylocera and is synonymized with the latter, as well as closely related Hypotyphla .
Enderlein, G. 1942. Klassifikation der Pyrgotiden. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft Naturforschenden Freunde zu Berlin, (1941) (2), 98 - 134.
Hendel, F. 1914. Neue Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Pyrgotinen. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 79 A (11) (1913), 77 - 117 + 1 Taf.
Steyskal, G. C. 1980. 42. Family Pyrgotidae. In: Crosskey, R. W., ed. A catalogue of the Diptera of the Afrotropical Region. British Museum (Natural History), London, 556 - 562.
Vanschuytbroeck, P. 1963. Pyrgotidae (Diptera Otitoidea). Institut des Parcs Nationaux du Congo et du Rwanda, Exploration du Parc National de la Garamba, Miss. H. De Saeger, 38, 1 - 76.
Fig. 18. Campylocera caudata: holotype ♀ (BMNH): 1 — habitus, lateral view; 2 — wing; 3 — veins R1, R2+3 and R4+5 (arrows indicate setulae); 4 — head, left; 5 — head, anterior view and fore femur (arrows indicate spurious setulae on anterior surface); 6 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 7 — mid and hind coxae; 8 — abdomen, dorsal view; 9 — fore femur and tibia, posterior; 10 — mid leg, anterior; 11 — hind leg, anterior view; 12 — labels.
Fig. 19. Campylocera caudata: non-type Ơ (1–4) and ♀ (5–9) (BMNH): 1 — abdomen, ventral view; 2 — male postebdomen, right; 3 — surstyli, enlarged; 4 — phallus glans, ventral; 5 — abdomen, left; 6 — abdominal sternites 1–6; 7 — aculeus; 8 — vagina and ventral receptacle; 9 — spermathecae (2 of 3).
Fig. 20. Campylocera caudata: holotype Ơ Lygiohypotyphla hyalipennis (MRAC): 1 — habitus, lateral view; 2 — wing; 3 — head, left; 4 — fore femur and tibia, posterior; 5 — hind leg, anterior view; 6 — labels.
Fig. 21. Campylocera caudata: holotype Ơ Lygiohypotyphla ruwenzoriensis (MRAC): 1 — habitus, lateral view; 2 — wing; 3 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 4 — fore femora and tibiae, posterior (glued on carton); 5— mid and hind femora and tibiae; 6 — mid and hind coxae; 7 — mid leg, anterior; 8 — epandrium (slide); 9 — labels.
Fig. 3. Campylocera ferruginea, non-type Ơ (1–6) and ♀ (7–11) (Nigeria, USNM): 1–2 — genitalia, right and ventral view; 3 — outer and inner surstyli, ventral view; 4–6 — phallus glans at different angles; 7 — oviscape apex; 8 — aculeus; 9 — vagina and ventral receptacle; 10 — medioventral lobe; 11 — spermathecae (2 of 3).
Fig. 8. Campylocera scalaris holotype ♀ (NHMW): 1 — habitus, lateral view; 2 —wing; 3 — head, left (arrow indicates enlarged setae); 4 —head, dorsal view; 5 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 6 — fore leg, posterior view; 7 — mid leg, anterior; 8 — hind leg, anterior view; 9 — oviscape, dorsal and left view; 10 — labels.
Fig. 9. Campylocera scalaris non-type ♀ (NHMW): (Nigera, USNM): 1 — abdomen, ventral view; 2 — oviscape, right view; 3 — aculeus; 4 — ventral receptacle.
Fig. 10. Campylocera latigenis: holotype Ơ (NHMW): 1 — habitus, lateral view; 2 — wing; 3 — head, right; 4 — head, dorsal view; 5 — labels.
Fig. 7. Campylocera hyalipennis, non-type ♀ (Uganda, USNM): 1 — abdomen, ventral view; 2— abdominal sternites 1–6; 3 — oviscape, left view; 4 — spermatheca (1 of 3); 5 — aculeus.
Fig.6. Campylocera kiwuensis holotype Ơ (MRAC):1 — habitus, lateral view;2 — wing; 3 — head,right; 4 — head, dorsal view; 5 — palp; 6 — fore leg, posterior view; 7 — hind leg, anterior view; 8 — epandrium, ventral view.
Fig. 5. Congopyrgota hyalipennis holotype ♀ (MRAC): 1, 7 — head, left (arrow indicates pointed angle of the flagellomere 1); 2 — head, anterior view; 3 — oviscape, dorsal view; 4 — habitus, left; 5 — wing; 6 — palp; 8 — head, dorsal view; 9 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 10 — abdomen and oviscape, right view; 11 — labels (1–3 — redrawn from Aczél (1958), with changes, 4–11 — original photos).
Fig. 1. Campylocera ferruginea, holotype (MHNP): 1 — habitus, lateral view; 2 — wing; 3 — head, left (arrow indicates enlarged setae); 4 — head, anterior view; 5 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 6 — labels.
Fig. 2. Campylocera ferruginea: holotype ♀ of Campylocera omissa (NHMW): 1 — habitus, lateral view; 2 — head, left (arrow indicates enlarged setae); 3 — head, anterior view; 4 —wing; 5 — mesonotum, dorsal view; 6 — fore leg, posterior view (arrow indicates long setae); 7 — mid leg, anterior; 8 — hind leg, anterior view; 9–10 — oviscape, dorsal and left view; 11 — labels.
MRAC |
Musée Royal de l’Afrique Centrale |
MHNP |
Museum d'Histoire Naturelle Perpignan |
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
NMKE |
National Museum of Kenya |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Pyrgotini |
SubTribe |
Adapsiliina |
Genus |
Campylocera caudata ( Hendel, 1914 )
Korneyev, V. A. 2016 |
Hypotyphla caudata
Steyskal, G. C. 1980: 559 |
Steyskal, G. C. 1980: 559 |
Steyskal, G. C. 1980: 559 |
Vanschuytbroeck, P. 1963: 43 |
Vanschuytbroeck, P. 1963: 45 |
Hendel, F. 1914: 99 |