Heterospilus (Eoheterospilus) rubrocinctus ( Ashmead, 1905 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3683.3.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C8D1F705-5C70-4ED6-8EC9-7B22699A06E8 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6144914 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D33B270E-FF9F-FFDA-4FAC-FBD17977FA21 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Heterospilus (Eoheterospilus) rubrocinctus ( Ashmead, 1905 ) |
| status |
|
Heterospilus (Eoheterospilus) rubrocinctus ( Ashmead, 1905) View in CoL
Hecabolus rubrocinctus Ashmead, 1905: 8 .
Heterospilus rubrocinctus: Shenefelt and Marsh, 1976: 1311 View in CoL ; Belokobylskij, 1994a: 23; Long and Belokobylskij 2003: 388; Belokobylskij and Maetô, 2008: 142; 2009: 175.
Heterospilus oculatus Belokobylskij, 1988: 628 View in CoL ; 1998: 76; Belokobylskij and Maetô, 2009: 175 (as synonym of H. rubrocinctus View in CoL ).
Material examined. China ( ZJUH). Zhejiang Prov.: 1Ƥ, Xitianmushan, Qiliting, 28.VII.1999, Zhao Mingshui, No. 998834.
Distribution. China (Zhejiang) (new record); Japan, Russia, Philippines, Vietnam.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Heterospilus (Eoheterospilus) rubrocinctus ( Ashmead, 1905 )
| Tang, Pu, Belokobylskij, Sergey A., He, Jun-Hua & Chen, Xue-Xin 2013 |
Heterospilus oculatus
| Belokobylskij 2009: 175 |
| Belokobylskij 1988: 628 |
Heterospilus rubrocinctus:
| Belokobylskij 2008: 142 |
| Long 2003: 388 |
| Belokobylskij 1994: 23 |
| Shenefelt 1976: 1311 |
Hecabolus rubrocinctus
| Ashmead 1905: 8 |