Cephalops amapaensis Rafael, 1990
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5141.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1A19245-2F3F-4F84-91BB-5B5A9FDA6236 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6592676 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C752F13C-FFCE-4853-FF4E-D5AAFF482E5B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cephalops amapaensis Rafael, 1990 |
status |
|
Cephalops amapaensis Rafael, 1990 View in CoL
Figs 17–32 View FIGURES 17–29 View FIGURES 30–32 , 107 View FIGURE 107
Pipunculus (Pipunculus) villifemoralis Hardy, 1965b: 22 , figs 5 a–b (identification error).
Cephalops amapaensis Rafael, 1990: 359 View in CoL , figs 1–8, 114; De Meyer, 1994: 11; De Meyer, 1996: 27; Rodriguez & Rafael, 2012: 15; Marques & Rafael, 2017; Marques et al. 2019: 251 View Cited Treatment , fig. 1a–l.
Diagnosis. Postpedicel yellow; fore coxa yellow or all coxae brown; wing brown infuscated, anal lobe narrower basally; tergite 1 velvety brown pruinose, tergites 2–5 shiny brown with inconspicuous setae; surstyli subsymmetrical, both thickened medially, with inner margins straight; apex of phallic guide stout and long, with two thin setae ventrally; ejaculatory apodeme funnel-shaped, leaning to one side; phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts short and backwards directed.
Intraspecific variability. Rafael (1990) provided a complete description and illustrations of the Brazilian holotype; however, we found variations in the Colombian specimens. Because of this, we provide a comparison of the variations between the Colombian and Brazilian specimens (between parenthesis, when comparable). MALE. Length 3.1 mm (versus 4.6 mm in the holotype); postcranium gray pruinose laterally and brown pruinose dorsally ( Fig. 17–18 View FIGURES 17–29 ); scape brown ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17–29 ); frontal triangle with inconspicuous brown callus (versus frontal triangle with narrowed black callus); scutellum with few tiny setae ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17–29 ); membrane brown infuscate ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 17–29 ); all coxae brown ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–29 ) (versus fore coxae yellow to light brown); femora light yellow in proximal third, yellow in distal three thirds ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–29 ) (versus femora entirely yellow); hind tibia with posterior erect setae medially (versus hind tibia without posterior erect setae medially); abdomen brown, tergite 1 velvety brown pruinose, with six brown and long setae laterally, tergites 2–5 shiny brown with inconspicuous setae ( Figs 18, 22 View FIGURES 17–29 ) (versus tergite 1 brown pruinose basally, gray pruinose distally interrupted medially, tergites 2–3 with shiny black spot posterolaterally, tergites 4–5 brown pruinose on 1/4–1/5 basally, other apical areas black), tergites and sternites 6 and 7 as in Fig. 23 View FIGURES 17–29 ; surstyli subsymmetrical, slightly equal to epandrium length, completely setose, both surstyli thickened medially, thin at bases and apices, with inner margins straight ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 17–29 ); both surstyli with tips forward-directed when seen in lateral view ( Figs 25–26 View FIGURES 17–29 ); gonopods subsymmetrical, left gonopod slightly thinner than right ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 17–29 ); apex of phallic guide stout and long, with two thin setae ventrally ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 17–29 ); ejaculatory apodeme funnel-shaped, leaning to one side ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 17–29 ); phallus trifid, with ejaculatory ducts short and backwards directed ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 17–29 ). FEMALE ( Figs 30–32 View FIGURES 30–32 ). Tergites 2–5 predominantly gray pruinose laterally (versus tergite 4–5 brown pruinose basally, shiny black posterolaterally); ovipositor base light brown, brownish-pruinose ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 30–32 ); piercer yellow, except the base brown, apex shiny, straight ( Fig. 32 View FIGURES 30–32 ).
Examined material. COLOMBIA, Caquetá, Solano, PNN [Parque Nacional Natural] Chiribiquete, Pto [Puerto] Abeja, B 4, 004’N/7226’’W, 310 m [eters], 12–19.xi.2000, J. Forero, “M954 (1 ♂ LEUA) (photographed specimen) , idem (1 ♂, 1 ♀ IAvH); idem Florencia, Vda.[Vereda] Brasil , 0139’08’’N/7535’39’’W, 365 m [eters], 03.x.2017, Y. Ramos-Pastrana, (1 ♀ LEUA –35893) .
Geographical distribution. French Guiana; Brazil; Colombia (Caquetá) (new record) ( Fig. 107 View FIGURE 107 ).
Habitat. The specimens were collected in preserved areas of tropical rain forest at the Colombian Amazonian, Department of Caquetá, Parque Nacional Natural Serrania de Chiribiquete, and Florencia, in the Andean-Amazon region .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Semicephalops |
Cephalops amapaensis Rafael, 1990
Ramos-Pastrana, Yardany, Marques, Dayse Willkenia A. & Rafael, José Albertino 2022 |
Cephalops amapaensis
Marques, D. W. A. & Skevington, Y. H. & Rafael, J. A. 2019: 251 |
Rodriguez, H. C. & Rafael, J. A. 2012: 15 |
De Meyer, M. 1996: 27 |
De Meyer, M. 1994: 11 |
Rafael, J. A. 1990: 359 |
Pipunculus (Pipunculus) villifemoralis
Hardy, D. E. 1965: 22 |