Smicromyrmini Bischoff, 1920
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4723.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4EC99D33-C686-446B-9E4E-F1EE5D3B6156 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5700274 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B86CED3E-D13F-FFE1-FF38-6A85FC60FB33 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2020-01-20 07:39:51, last updated 2023-10-31 18:48:22) |
scientific name |
Smicromyrmini Bischoff, 1920 |
status |
|
Tribe Smicromyrmini Bischoff, 1920
( Figs 1–47 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 View FIGURE 16 View FIGURE 17 View FIGURE 18 View FIGURE 19 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 View FIGURE 23 View FIGURE 24 View FIGURE 25 View FIGURE 26 View FIGURE 27 View FIGURE 28 View FIGURE 29 View FIGURE 30 View FIGURE 31 View FIGURE 32 View FIGURE 33 View FIGURE 34 View FIGURE 35 View FIGURE 36 View FIGURE 37 View FIGURE 38 View FIGURE 39 View FIGURE 40 View FIGURE 41 View FIGURE 42 View FIGURE 43 View FIGURE 44 View FIGURE 45 View FIGURE 46 View FIGURE 47 )
Smicromyrmini Bischoff, 1920: 23 .
Smicromyrminae: Invrea 1964: 151.
Diagnosis. MALE. Eye without setae; inner margin deeply notched. F1 length ~0.8 × that of F2. Scutellum simple, without median carina or postero-lateral denticle. Wing venations not reaching its apex; distance between origin of RS on vein Sc and base of stigmatic cell nearly 2 × stigmatic cell length; hind wing without anal lobe. Claws without inner denticles. Metasomal segment 1 narrow; segment 2 with lateral felt line on T and sometimes on S; S8 not reduced, plate-like; genitalia with symmetrical penis valves. FEMALE. Head not enlarged; eye oval, slightly protruding from head capsule, without setae; Maxillary palpus six segmented; labial palpus four segmented. Mesosoma widest at pronotum or propodeum; mesopleuron concave; meso-metapleural suture ending at pronotal spiracle; dorsum of propodeum without row of denticles. Claws without inner denticles. T1 much narrower than T2, not petiolate; T2 with one median, two transverse (some Mickelomyrme Lelej, 1995 ) or three transverse basal spots of pale setae, rarely with one basal, two lateral and one apical spot (some Physetopoda Schuster, 1949 ) or without any spots; T2 rarely with basal band of pale setae (some Dentilla Lelej, 1980 ).
Genera included. 26 genera and four subgenera. See Brothers & Lelej (2017). The genera Smicromyrme Thomson, 1870 , Nemka Lelej, 1985 , Mickelomyrme Lelej, 1995 , Andreimyrme Lelej, 1995 , Ephucilla Lelej, 1995 and Sinotilla Lelej, 1995 are recognized from Japan.
Distribution. Afrotropical, Palaearctic and Oriental regions (Lelej 2007).
Bischoff, H. (1920 - 1921) Monographie der Mutilliden Afrikas. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, 86 A (1 - 3) & 86 A (4 - 5), 1 - 480 (1920) & 481 - 830 (1921).
Brothers, D. J. & Lelej, A. S. (2017) Phylogeny and higher classification of Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) based on morphological reanalyses. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 60, 1 - 97. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / jhr. 60.20091
Invrea, F. (1964) Mutillidae-Myrmosidae. Fauna d'Italia, 5. Edizioni Calderini, Bologna, xii + 302 pp. + [1].
Lelej, A. S. & Kabakov, O. N. (1980) On Bradynobaenidae and Mutillidae (Hymenoptera) of Afghanistan. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 59 (1), 181 - 196. [in Russian, English translation (1981) in Entomological Review, 59 (1), 141 - 156]
Lelej, A. S. (1985) The velvet ants (Hymenoptera, Mutillidae) of the USSR and neighboring countries. Nauka, Leningrad, 268 pp. [in Russian]
Schuster, R. M. (1949) Contribution towards a monograph of the Mutillidae of the Neotropical region. III. A key to the subfamilies represented and descriptions of several new genera (Hymenoptera). Entomologica Americana, New Series, 29 (3 - 4), 59 - 140.
Thomson, C. G. (1870) Ofversigt af Sveriges rofsteklar. Opuscula Entomologica, Lund, 1 (2), 202 - 251.
FIGURE 1. Smicromyrme lewisi Mickel, ♂♀ in couple, male grasping the pronotal collar of female with his mandibles.
FIGURE 2. Smicromyrme lewisi Mickel, Japan, habitus.A–B. ♂, typical form, Ehime; C–D. ♂, nigricula form, Hokkaidô; E–F. ♀, Ehime; G–H. holotype, Sm. lewisi, ♀; I–J. holotype, Sm. momidziyama Tsuneki, ♀; A, C, E, G, I. dorsal view; B, D, F, H, J. lateral view.
FIGURE 3. Smicromyrme lewisi Mickel, ♂, Japan. A–B. Typical form, Ehime; C–D. nigricula form, Hokkaidô; A, C. meso- soma, dorsal view; B, D. metasoma, dorsal view; a = humeral width; b = pronotal width; c = mesonotal width; d = mesoscutal width; e = mesoscutal length; f = dorsal T2 length; g = T2 width.
FIGURE 4. Smicromyrme lewisi Mickel, ♂, Japan. A–C, G. Typical form, Ehime; D–F, H. nigricula form, Hokkaidô; A, D. head, dorsal view; B, E. head, lateral view; C, F. head, frontal view; G, H. tegula; a = head length; b = head width; c = OL; d = POL; e/f = GOI; g = OOL; h = LOD; I = MOD; j = tegula length; k = tegula width.
FIGURE 5. Smicromyrme lewisi Mickel, ♂, Japan. A, C, E. Typical form, Ehime; B, D, F. nigricula form, Hokkaidô; A–B. wings; C–D. male genitalia, inner view; E–F. penis valve.
FIGURE 6. Smicromyrme lewisi Mickel, ♀, Japan. A–B. Ehime; C–D. holotype, Sm. lewisi; E–F. holotype, Sm. momidziyama Tsuneki; A, C, E. mesosoma, dorsal view; B, D, F. metasoma, dorsal view; a = dorsal thoracic length; b = humeral width; c = pronotal width; d = mesonotal width; e = propodeal width; f = metasomal width; g = minimum distance between basomedial pale spot and apical pale band; h = dorsal T2 length.
FIGURE 7. Smicromyrme lewisi Mickel, ♀, Japan. A–C, J. Ehime; D–F, K. holotype, Sm. lewisi; G–I, L. holotype, Sm. momidziyama Tsuneki; A, D, G. head, dorsal view; B, E, H. head, lateral view; C, F, I. head, frontal view; J–L. pygidial area; a = head length; b = head width; c/d = GOI; e = eye height; f = malar length; g = minimum distance between eyes.
FIGURE 8. Smicromyrme lewisi Mickel, ♀. A. Original description and habitus illustration of Mutilla cameroni Yano; B–E. color variation of mesosoma. A from Yano (1932): 326.
FIGURE 9. Nemka spp., ♂, habitus. A–B. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Kyôto; C–D. holotype, N. chihpenchia (Tsuneki); E–F. N. limi (Chen); A, C, E. dorsal view; B, D, F. lateral view.
FIGURE 10. Nemka spp., ♀, habitus. A–B. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Chiba; C–D. paratype, N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov.; E–F. lectotype, N. wotani (Zavattari); G–H. paratype, N. limi limi (Chen); I–J. paratype, N. limi nanhai (Chen); A, C, E, G, I. dorsal view; B, D, F, H, J. lateral view.
FIGURE 11. Nemka spp., ♂. A–B. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Kyôto; C–D. holotype, N. chihpenchia (Tsuneki); E–F. N. limi (Chen); A, C, E. mesosoma, dorsal view; B, D, F. metasoma, dorsal view.
FIGURE 12. Nemka spp., ♂. A–C, J. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Kyôto; D–F, K. holotype, N. chihpenchia (Tsuneki); G–I, L. N. limi (Chen); A, D, G. head, dorsal view; B, E, H. head, lateral view; C, F, I. head, frontal view; J–L. tegula.
FIGURE 13. Nemka spp., ♂. A, D–E. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Kyôto; B. N. wotani (Zavattari); F–G. holotype, N. chihpenchia (Tsuneki); C, H–I. N. limi (Chen); A–C. wings; D, F, H. male genitalia, inner view; E, G, I. penis valve.
FIGURE 14. Nemka spp., ♂. A–C. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Kyôto; D–F. N. wotani (Zavattari); G–I. N. limi (Chen); A, D, G. gena; B, E, H. lateral face of pronotum; C, F, I. precoxal tubercle on mesopleuron.
FIGURE 15. Nemka spp., ♀, mesosoma, dorsal view. A. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Chiba; B. paratype, N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov.; C. lectotype, N. wotani (Zavattari); D. paratype, N. limi limi (Chen); E. paratype, N. limi nanhai (Chen).
FIGURE 16. Nemka spp., ♀, metasoma, dorsal view.A. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Chiba; B. paratype, N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov.; C. lectotype, N. wotani (Zavattari); D. paratype, N. limi limi (Chen); E. paratype, N. limi nanhai (Chen).
FIGURE 17. Nemka spp., ♀, head.A–C. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Chiba; D–F. paratype, N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov.; G–I. lectotype, N. wotani (Zavattari); J–L. paratype, N. limi limi (Chen); A, D, G, J. dorsal view; B, E, H, K. lateral view; C, F, I, L. frontal view.
FIGURE 18. Nemka spp., ♀. A–C, H. paratype, N. limi nanhai (Chen); D. N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov., Chiba; E. paratype, N. yasumatsui (Mickel), stat. rev. et comb. nov.; F. lectotype, N. wotani (Zavattari); G. paratype, N. limi limi (Chen); A. head, dorsal view; B. head, lateral view; C. head, frontal view; D–H. pygidial area.
FIGURE 19. Mickelomyrme hageni (Zavattari), habitus. A–B. ♂, Ishigaki-jima Is.; C–D. lectotype, Mi. hageni, ♂; E–F. ♀, Ishigaki-jima Is.; G–H. lectotype, Mi. alberici (Zavattari), ♀; A, C, E, G. dorsal view; B, D, F, H. lateral view.
FIGURE 20. Mickelomyrme spp., habitus. A–B. Mi. athalia (Pagden), ♂; C–D. paratype, Mi. yunnanensis Lelej, ♀.
FIGURE 21. Mickelomyrme spp., ♂. A–B. Mi. hageni (Zavattari), Ishigaki-jima Is.; C–D. lectotype, Mi. hageni; E–F. Mi. atahlia (Pagden); A, C, E. mesosoma, dorsal view; B, D, F. metasoma, dorsal view.
FIGURE 22. Mickelomyrme spp., ♂. A–C, J. Mi. hageni (Zavattari), Ishigaki-jima Is.; D–F, K. lectotype, Mi. hageni; G–I, L. Mi. atahlia (Pagden); A, D, G. head, dorsal view; B, E, H. head, lateral view; C, F, I. head, frontal view; J–L. tegula.
FIGURE 23. Mickelomyrme spp., ♂. A, C–D. Mi. hageni (Zavattari), Ishigaki-jima Is.; E–F. lectotype, Mi. hageni; B, G–H. Mi. atahlia (Pagden); A–B. wings; C, E, G. male genitalia, inner view; D, F, H. penis valve.
FIGURE 24. Mickelomyrme hageni (Zavattari), ♂, T7. A. Lectotype; B. Ishigaki-jima Is.; C. Yonaguni-jima Is.; D. Ishigakijima Is.
FIGURE 25. Mickelomyrme spp., ♀. A–B. Mi. hageni (Zavattari), Ishigaki-jima Is.; C–D. lectotype, Mu. alberici Zavattari; E–F. paratype, Mi. yunnanensis Lelej; A, C, E. mesosoma, dorsal view; B, D, F. metasoma, dorsal view.
FIGURE 26. Mickelomyrme spp., ♀. A–C, J. Mi. hageni (Zavattari), Ishigaki-jima Is.; D–F, K. lectotype, Mu. alberici Zavattari; G–I, L. paratype, Mi. yunnanensis Lelej; A, D, G. head, dorsal view; B, E, H. head, lateral view; C, F, I. head, frontal view; J–L. pygidial area.
FIGURE 27. Mickelomyrme spp., ♀, vertex.A. paratype, Mi. yunnanensis Lelej; B. Mi. pusillaeformis (Hammer), Indonesia; C. lectotype, Mu. alberici Zavattari; D. Mi. hageni (Zavattari), Taiwan; E. Mi. hageni, Yonaguni-jima Is.; F. Mi. hageni, Ishigakijima Is.
FIGURE 28. Andreimyrme substriolata (Chen), ♀, habitus. A–B. Amami-ôshima Is.; C–D. holotype, A. substriolata; E–F. holotype, Sm. tridentiens Chen; G–H. paratype, A. substriolata; I. Taiwan; J. Okinawa-jima Is.
FIGURE 29. Andreimyrme substriolata (Chen), ♀. A–B. Amami-ôshima Is.; C–D. paratype, A. substriolata; A, C. mesosoma, dorsal view; B, D. metasoma, dorsal view.
FIGURE 30. Andreimyrme substriolata (Chen), ♀. A–C, G. Amami-ôshima Is.; D–F, H. paratype, A. substriolata; A, D. head, dorsal view; B, E. head, lateral view; C, F. head, frontal view; G–H. pygidial area.
FIGURE 31. Andreimyrme davidi (André), ♂ in TARI, China.A. Habitus, lateral view; B. head, frontal view; C. male genitalia, inner view; D. penis valve; E. labels.
FIGURE 32. Ephucilla spp., ♂, habitus. A–B. Holotype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; C–D. holotype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; E–F. holotype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; G–H. paralectotype, E. naja (Zavattari); A, C, E, G. dorsal view; B, D, F, H. lateral view.
FIGURE 33. Ephucilla spp., ♀, habitus. A–B. Paratype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; C–D. paratype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; E–F. paratype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; G–H. holotype, E. thalia (Mickel); A, C, E, G. dorsal view; B, D, F, H. lateral view.
FIGURE 34. Ephucilla spp., ♂. A–B. Holotype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; C–D. E. suginoi sp. nov., holotype; E–F. E. brevitegula sp. nov., holotype; G–H. E. naja (Zavattari), paralectotype; A, C, E, G. mesosoma, dorsal view; B, D, F, H. metasoma, dorsal view.
FIGURE 35. Ephucilla spp., ♂. A–B. Paratypes, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; C. holotype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; D. holotype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; E. holotype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; F. paralectotype, E. naja (Zavattari); A–B. mesosoma, dorsal view; C–F. tegula.
FIGURE 36. Ephucilla spp., ♂, head.A–C. Holotype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; D–F. holotype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; G–I. holotype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; J–L. paralectotype, E. naja (Zavattari);A, D, G, J. dorsal view; B, E, H, K. lateral view; C, F, I, L. frontal view.
FIGURE 37. Ephucilla spp., ♂, wings. A. Holotype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; B. holotype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; C. holotype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; D. E. naja (Zavattari).
FIGURE 38. Ephucilla spp., ♂. A–B. Holotype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; C–D. holotype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; E–F. holotype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; G–H. paralectotype, E. naja (Zavattari); A, C, E, G. male genitalia, inner view; B, D, F, H. penis valve.
FIGURE 39. Ephucilla spp., ♀. A–B. Paratype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; C–D. paratype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; E–F. paratype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; G–H. holotype, E. thalia (Mickel); A, C, E, G. mesosoma, dorsal view; B, D, F, H. metasoma, dorsal view.
FIGURE 40. Ephucilla spp., ♀, head. A–C. Paratype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; D–F. paratype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; G–I. paratype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; J–L. holotype, E. thalia (Mickel); A, D, G, J. dorsal view; B, E, H, K. lateral view; C, F, I, L. frontal view.
FIGURE 41. Ephucilla spp., ♀, pygidial area. A. Paratype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; B. paratype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; C. paratype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; D. holotype, E. thalia (Mickel).
FIGURE 42. Ephucilla spp., ♀, dorsal pronotal tooth. A. Paratype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; B. paratype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; C. paratype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; D. holotype, E. thalia (Mickel).
FIGURE 43. Ephucilla spp., ♀, humeral carina. A. Paratype, E. yoshitakei sp. nov.; B. paratype, E. suginoi sp. nov.; C. paratype, E. brevitegula sp. nov.; D. holotype, E. thalia (Mickel).
FIGURE 44. Type locality of Ephucilla brevitegula sp. nov. in Iriomote-jima Island (photo by K. Kuroda).
FIGURE 45. Mt. Tangmadan-shan in Taiwan. A. Dry evergreen broadleaf forest floor where Ephucilla naja was collected; B. a hollow of a pine tree on the mountain ridge where E. thalia was collected.
FIGURE 46. Sinotilla jambar sp. nov., ♂, holotype.A. habitus, dorsal view; B. habitus, lateral view; C. mesosoma, dorsal view; D. metasoma, dorsal view; E. head, dorsal view; F. head, lateral view; G. head, frontal view; H. wings; I. male genitalia, inner view; J. penis valve.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Smicromyrmini Bischoff, 1920
Okayasu, Juriya 2020 |
Smicromyrmini
Bischoff, H. & Monographie der Mutilliden Afrikas 1920: 23 |
1 (by plazi, 2020-01-20 07:39:51)
2 (by ExternalLinkService, 2020-01-20 07:50:47)
3 (by angel, 2020-02-27 10:32:36)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-12 04:21:11)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-12 04:47:15)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2021-11-14 07:54:56)
7 (by plazi, 2023-10-30 23:09:04)