Smeringopina lekoni, Huber, Bernhard A., 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3713.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5F0BC11-92C0-4B30-9DB3-200882AC8950 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6161985 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B20287ED-FFF5-FF88-B990-C036FCCD3CD5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Smeringopina lekoni |
status |
sp. nov. |
Smeringopina lekoni View in CoL new species
Figs. 27 View FIGURES 17 – 31 , 138–142 View FIGURES 133 – 142 , 168, 178 View FIGURES 163 – 183 , 246–252 View FIGURES 246 – 252
Type. ♂ holotype from Gabon, Haut Ogooué , forest at Lékoni River (1°10.7’S, 13°32.3’E), 305 m a.s.l., 18.viii.2011 (B.A. & S.R. Huber), in ZFMK (Ar 10203).
Other material examined. GABON: Haut Ogooué : forest at Lékoni River, same data as holotype, 2♂ 5♀ in ZFMK (Ar 10204); same data, 1♀ 3 juvs. in pure ethanol, in ZFMK (Gab 214).
Etymology. The name is a noun in apposition, derived from the type locality.
Diagnosis. Easily distinguished from congeners by distinctive modification of clypeus (long median apophysis projecting downwards from rim; Fig. 246 View FIGURES 246 – 252 ) and frontal apophyses on male chelicerae ( Fig. 250 View FIGURES 246 – 252 ; similar S. mohoba but much longer) and by triangular anterior epigynal plate with cone-shaped median process ( Figs. 168 View FIGURES 163 – 183 , 251 View FIGURES 246 – 252 ).
Male (holotype). Total body length 3.7, carapace width 1.3. Leg 1: 42.4 (10.0 + 0.4 + 10.0 + 20.0 + 2.0), tibia 2: 6.2, tibia 3: 4.2, tibia 4: 6.4; tibia 1 L/d: 98. Distance PME-PME 135 µm, diameter PME 125 µm, distance PME- ALE 60 µm, distance AME-AME 45 µm, diameter AME 100 µm. Carapace ochre-yellow with brown triangular mark posteriorly and brown lateral margins; ocular area posteriorly brown, clypeus with brown pattern, sternum dark brown; legs light brown, femora with dark rings subdistally, tibiae with dark rings proximally and subdistally and additional indistinct ring medially; abdomen ochre-gray with dark pattern dorsally, laterally, and ventrally, ventral dark bands with lateral constriction. Habitus as in Figs. 138–139 View FIGURES 133 – 142 , ocular area slightly elevated, secondary eyes with indistinct ‘pseudo-lenses’; clypeus with long median apophysis projecting downwards from rim ( Fig. 246 View FIGURES 246 – 252 ); deep thoracic pit and pair of shallow furrows diverging behind pit. Chelicerae as in Fig. 250 View FIGURES 246 – 252 , with lateral apophyses in very distal position, with distinctive, strongly ridged frontal apophyses, without modified hairs. Palps as in Figs. 140–142 View FIGURES 133 – 142 ; coxa with retrolateral apophysis; trochanter with strong but simple ventral apophysis; femur with large retrolateral apophysis directed toward ventrally, proximally accompanied by two sclerotized humps, without prolateral modification, with weakly sclerotized slender ventral projection distally; prolateral femur-patella joint strongly shifted toward ventrally; tarsus with some longer and slightly stronger hairs dorsally; procursus as in Figs. 247–248 View FIGURES 246 – 252 , with complex membranous and sclerotized structures ventrally, without hinge; bulb with simple weakly sclerotized process ( Fig. 249 View FIGURES 246 – 252 ; sperm duct apparently opens at basis of this process). Legs without spines and curved hairs, with few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 2%; prolateral trichobothrium present on all tibiae; pseudosegments barely visible.
Variation. Tibia 1 in 2 other males: 8.5, 9.5.
Female. In general similar to male; clypeus unmodified. Tibia 1 in 5 females: 6.1–6.9 (mean 6.7). Epigynum anterior plate triangular with cone-shaped median process flanked by pair of shallow depressions ( Figs. 168 View FIGURES 163 – 183 , 251 View FIGURES 246 – 252 ); posterior plate laterally with overhanging folds ( Fig. 251 View FIGURES 246 – 252 ); internal genitalia as in Figs. 178 View FIGURES 163 – 183 and 252 View FIGURES 246 – 252 .
Natural history. Litter-dwelling species that shares the microhabitat at type locality with a superficially similar Pholcus species ( Pholcus cf. moca Huber, 2011).
Distribution. Known from type locality only ( Fig. 114 View FIGURE 114 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |