Smeringopina essotah, Huber, Bernhard A., 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3713.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5F0BC11-92C0-4B30-9DB3-200882AC8950 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6162077 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B20287ED-FFCC-FFB3-B990-C030FCCC3CD5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Smeringopina essotah |
status |
sp. nov. |
Smeringopina essotah View in CoL new species
Figs. 7 View FIGURES 2 – 16 , 633–637 View FIGURES 628 – 637 , 680–681 View FIGURES 678 – 693 , 695 View FIGURES 694 – 702 , 738–743 View FIGURES 738 – 743
Type. ♂ holotype from Cameroon, Southwest Region, near Dschang, Essotah (5°25.5’N, 9°54.7’E), 1600 m a.s.l., near ground, under and among rocks, 21.iv.2009 (B.A. Huber), in ZFMK (Ar 10289).
Other material examined. CAMEROON: Southwest Region: near Dschang, Essotah , same data as holotype, 3♂ 14♀ in ZFMK (Ar 10290); same data, 6 juvs. in pure ethanol, in ZFMK (Cam 97).
Etymology. The name is a noun in apposition, derived from the type locality.
Diagnosis. Distinguished from similar congeners (large species with long abdomen, cone-shaped modified hairs on male chelicerae, embolus with sclerotized proximal part) by combination of unmodified clypeus, shape of massive procursus (distinctive distal elements, Figs. 738–739 View FIGURES 738 – 743 ) and median projection on epigynum ( Fig. 681 View FIGURES 678 – 693 ; similar S. africana whose epigynum is very different in ventral view, compare Figs. 519 View FIGURES 509 – 524 and 680 View FIGURES 678 – 693 ).
Male (holotype). Total body length 7.8, carapace width 2.0. Leg 1: 85.9 (19.7 + 0.8 + 19.2 + 42.1 + 4.1), tibia 2: 13.3, tibia 3: 9.5, tibia 4: 12.1; tibia 1 L/d: 99. Distance PME-PME 210 µm, diameter PME 175 µm, distance PME-ALE 90 µm, distance AME-AME 45 µm, diameter AME 160 µm. Carapace ochre-yellow with brown mark posteriorly and brown lateral margins; ocular area brown, clypeus with pair of dark marks laterally, sternum dark brown; legs ochre-yellow, dark rings subdistally on femora and tibiae and in patella area, tips of femora and tibiae whitish; abdomen ochre-gray with distinct black pattern dorsally, laterally, and ventrally. Habitus as in Figs. 633– 634 View FIGURES 628 – 637 , ocular area slightly elevated, secondary eyes with distinct ‘pseudo-lenses’; clypeus unmodified except slightly longer hairs; deep thoracic pit and pair of shallow furrows diverging behind pit. Chelicerae as in Fig. 740 View FIGURES 738 – 743 , with lateral proximal apophyses and large distal apophyses, the latter and frontal cheliceral face provided with modified (cone-shaped) hairs. Palps as in Figs. 635–637 View FIGURES 628 – 637 ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with simple retrolatero-ventral apophysis; femur proximally with ventral pocket bordered retrolaterally by strong sclerotized ridge ( Fig. 637 View FIGURES 628 – 637 ), with very tiny retrolateral apophysis, without prolateral modification; prolateral femur-patella joint very prominent and strongly shifted toward ventrally; tarsus with some stronger hairs dorsally; procursus with distinct hinge between proximal and distal part, complex distally ( Figs. 738–739 View FIGURES 738 – 743 ); bulb with widened and heavily sclerotized proximal part of embolus ( Fig. 741 View FIGURES 738 – 743 ). Legs without spines and curved hairs, with few vertical hairs, retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 1.5%; prolateral trichobothrium present on all tibiae; pseudosegments barely visible.
Variation. Tibia 1 in 3 other males: 16.9, 17.9, 18.7.
Female. In general similar to male but clypeus often darker; clypeus with shorter hairs. Tibia 1 in 12 females: 12.8–15.1 (mean 14.0); light median posterior line ventrally on abdomen variably distinct. Epigynum large, consisting of wide, roughly triangular anterior plate with median projection and large posterior plate ( Figs. 680– 681 View FIGURES 678 – 693 , 742 View FIGURES 738 – 743 ); internal genitalia as in Figs. 695 View FIGURES 694 – 702 and 743 View FIGURES 738 – 743 (pore plates hidden in deep folds behind lateral sclerites).
Natural history. S. essotah was collected from large webs built under and among huge rocks in a well preserved forest. When disturbed, the spiders swiftly ran to the rock wall where they were barely visible among the mosses.
Distribution. Known from type locality only ( Fig. 627 View FIGURE 627 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |