Lypoglossa angularis
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.158194 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C33D1A01-2247-47C8-BA04-79ADFBB629E5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6269833 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AE6A8797-7C5A-FFD9-FEB7-C73AFB9CC422 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lypoglossa angularis |
status |
|
1. Lypoglossa angularis View in CoL (Mäklin in Mannerheim, 1853)
( Figs. 1–12, 15, 17 View FIGURES 1 – 5 View FIGURES 6 – 11 View FIGURES 12 – 17 , 25–50 View FIGURES 25 – 32 View FIGURES 33 – 40 View FIGURES 41 – 48 View FIGURES 49 – 50 )
Myrmedonia angularis Mäklin View in CoL in Mannerheim, 1853: 181.
Euryusa obtusa LeConte, 1866: 373 , syn. nov.
Dasyglossa angularis: Bernhauer, 1906: 348 View in CoL (as synonym of Dasyglossa prospera (Erichson, 1839)) .
Dasyglossa fenyesi Bernhauer, 1907: 402 View in CoL .
Lypoglossa fenyesi: Fenyes, 1920: 239 View in CoL (as valid species).
Dasyglossa angularis: Fenyes, 1920: 359 View in CoL (as synonym of Dasyglossa prospera (Erichson, 1839)) .
Lypoglossa fenyesi: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 597 View in CoL (as valid species).
Dasyglossa angularis: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 766 View in CoL (as synonym of Dasyglossa prospera (Erichson, 1839)) .
Lypoglossa fenyesi: Moore & Legner, 1975: 448 View in CoL (as valid species).
Devia angularis: Moore & Legner, 1975: 396 (as synonym of Devia prospera (Erichson, 1839)) View in CoL .
Lypoglossa fenyesi: Seevers, 1978: 271 View in CoL (as valid species).
Lypoglossa angularis: Lohse & Smetana, 1985: 293 View in CoL (as valid species).
Lypoglossa angularis: Hoebeke,1992: 390 View in CoL , ex parte (as valid species).
Lypoglossa fenyesi: Hoebeke, 1992: 391 View in CoL (as synonym of L. angularis View in CoL )
Examined material. Listed separately for each subspecies except for the following female specimens unassigned to subspecies: UNITED STATES: Oregon: Deschutes Co.: Ψ, 12 mi. SW Sisters, FSR 1551, 4400', 23.vii.1979 (J.M.Campbell & B.A.Smetana) ( CNCI); California: El Dorado Co.: Ψ, Lake Tahoe, Cascade Lake, 6300', 11.viii.1969 (A.Smetana) ( CNCI).
Diagnosis. Lypoglossa angularis differs from the Palaearctic L. lateralis in the following characters: pronotum and elytra lighter than head and abdomen; punctation of head and pronotum not asperate, and a distinct shape of the aedeagus ( Figs. 25–30 View FIGURES 25 – 32 ; 72–77) and spermatheca ( Figs. 32 View FIGURES 25 – 32 ; 78).
Lypoglossa angularis differs from L. franclemonti in having a more transverse pronotum, less elongate antennal articles; the apex of the median lobe (in parameral view) constricted basally ( Figs. 25–27 View FIGURES 25 – 32 , 33–35 View FIGURES 33 – 40 ; 64–65), with a dentiform projection on each side of the apex base ( Figs. 25–29 View FIGURES 25 – 32 ; 64–67); the proximal loop of the spermatheca narrower, with parallel sides ( Figs. 32 View FIGURES 25 – 32 , 40 View FIGURES 33 – 40 ; 70).
Lypoglossa angularis can be distinguished from L. manitobae in having a larger body size, and longer and sharper dentiform projections at the base of the apex of median lobe ( Figs. 25–29 View FIGURES 25 – 32 ; 55–59).
Description. Length 3.9–4.4 mm. Head and abdomen dark brown; pronotum lighter, brownish red to brown with lighter margins; elytra brownish yellow to brown, with darker scutellar area and posterolateral angle; legs, mouthparts and 3 basal antennal articles brownish yellow, antennal articles 4–11 darker, reddish brown.
Head surface glossy, with weak isodiametric microsculpture, with strong punctation, distance between punctures equals 1–2 times their diameter. Eyes 1.1–1.4 times as long as temples. Antennal articles 4–5 elongate, 6 slightly elongate or subquadrate, 7–10 subquadrate or slightly transverse ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 12 – 17 ).
Pronotum transverse, 1.5 times as wide as head, width 0.91–1.04 mm, length 0.64– 0.74 mm, width to length ratio 1.4; surface glossy, with weak isodiametric microsculpture; punctation finer than on head, distance between punctures equal to their diameter. Elytra wider (1.00– 1.17 mm) and longer (0.71–0.86 mm; measured from humeral angle) than pronotum (elytral length to pronotal length ratio 1.1), 1.3–1.4 times as wide as long, surface glossy, with weak isodiametric microsculpture; punctation slightly asperate and stronger than on pronotum, distance between punctures equals ½–1 times their diameter.
Abdominal terga with very fine (poorly visible at 70x) microsculpture consisting of transverse waves; terga 3–5 matte due to fine and dense punctation, distance between punctures equals 1–2 times their diameter, terga 6–7 glossy, with sparser punctation, distance between punctures equals 2–5 times their diameter.
In males, head with weak medial impression and pronotum with broad impression along midline.
Aedeagus as in Figs. 25–31 View FIGURES 25 – 32 , 33–39 View FIGURES 33 – 40 , 41–47 View FIGURES 41 – 48 .
Spermatheca as in Figs. 32 View FIGURES 25 – 32 , 40 View FIGURES 33 – 40 , 48 View FIGURES 41 – 48 .
Distribution. Lypoglossa angularis is widely distributed in the western North America, from Alaska, Yukon Territory and British Columbia in the north to the high mountains of California, Colorado, New Mexico and Arizona in the south. There is an isolated population of this species in the northeastern states and provinces (Newfoundland, Quebec, Maine and New Hampshire) ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 ). In Alaska L. angularis is continuously distributed and along the coast occurs at sea level. In interior British Columbia and Alberta and further south Lypoglossa angularis is restricted to boreal forests in high mountains and does not occur in valleys. Further south the localities are at higher elevations in the mountains. Despite the fact that in the interior United States the recorded distributions of L. lateralis consists of isolated populations, I could find no gaps in any morphological characters between the specimens from different isolates. Apparently the isolation between these populations is recent and L. angularis probably had a continuous distribution in the interior United States during colder and/or wetter periods of the Pleistocene.
I recognize three valid subspecies within L. angularis ( Fig. 18 View FIGURE 18 ). The main reason for interpreting the three geographic varieties as subspecies is that there is no distinct hiatus between them and intermediate forms are occasionally found. The subspecies are para or allopatric in their distribution. The differences between these subspecies are discussed below.
Natural History. Lypoglossa angularis is common in forest litter and moss in boreal forests. It was also collected in dung, gopher burrows and by pitfall traps.
CNCI |
Canadian National Collection Insects |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lypoglossa angularis
Gusarov, Vladimir I. 2004 |
Lypoglossa angularis:
Hoebeke 1992: 390 |
Lypoglossa fenyesi:
Hoebeke 1992: 391 |
Lypoglossa angularis:
Lohse 1985: 293 |
Lypoglossa fenyesi:
Seevers 1978: 271 |
Lypoglossa fenyesi:
Moore 1975: 448 |
Devia angularis:
Moore 1975: 396 |
Lypoglossa fenyesi:
Bernhauer 1926: 597 |
Dasyglossa angularis:
Bernhauer 1926: 766 |
Lypoglossa fenyesi:
Fenyes 1920: 239 |
Dasyglossa angularis:
Fenyes 1920: 359 |
Dasyglossa fenyesi
Bernhauer 1907: 402 |
Dasyglossa angularis:
Bernhauer 1906: 348 |
Euryusa obtusa
LeConte 1866: 373 |
Myrmedonia angularis Mäklin
Mannerheim 1853: 181 |