Atrichopogon (A.) ruber Kieffer, 1916
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.190490 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6216504 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A96187C8-517B-2262-FF48-81DAFEAA230C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Atrichopogon (A.) ruber Kieffer, 1916 |
status |
|
Atrichopogon (A.) ruber Kieffer, 1916 View in CoL
( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 L, 1T, 1W, 2I, 2J)
Atrichopogon ruber Kieffer, 1916a: 86 View in CoL (description of female and male, syntypes - 4 males, 6 females from Kosempo, Chip – Chip and Tainan); Kieffer 1921: 563 (note on female, records from Taihoku and Hokuto); Kieffer 1922: 155 (records of 4 females and 6 males from Paroe, Taihoku and Hokuto).
Atrichopogon formosanus Kieffer, 1918: 89 View in CoL (female, Pilam, Sauter, Taiwan). Syn. nov.
Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) formosanus: Tokunaga 1940b: 110 View in CoL (female, Taihoku, Taiwan); Liu et al. 2001: 30 (female, male, figs., China); Yu et al. 2006: 341 (female, male, figs., China).
Diagnosis. Female eyes bare, proximal flagellomeres spherical, AR 2.4, paratergite with 1 seta, scutellum with 6 bristles.
Description. Female. Eyes bare, broadly fused along the distance of 5 ommatidia. Flagellum uniformly brown, proximal flagellomeres spherical ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 L), AR 2.36–2.43. Palpus 5–segmented, PR 2.7–2.9. Mandible armed with about 30 small teeth. Scutum reddish brown with pale stripes, bases of scutal setae with dark spots. Scutellum yellow or brownish, bearing 6 bristles. Wing length 1.34–1.50 mm, CR 0.77, membrane with macrotrichia in all marginal cells, second radial cell 4.3 times longer than first ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 I). Halter pale. Legs yellow. TR (I) 2.6–2.8, TR (II) 2.8–3.1, TR (III) 2.5. Seminal capsule spherical, with short neck ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 T), 0.107–0.122 mm long.
Male. Similar to female, with usual sexual differences. AR 1.27. PR 3.8–4.6. Wing length 1.54–1.59 mm, CR 0.70–0.71. Wing membrane bearing some macrotrichia in cell R5 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 J). TR (I) 2.7, TR (II) 2.5–2.8, TR (III) 2.6. Aedeagus as in Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 W.
Material examined. Male: Hokuto (Form.), H. Sauter XII 1912, cotypus, Atrichopogon ruber K., Atrichopogon ruber Kieff. Male: Taihoku, Distr. Maruyama XII.1912, Atrichopogon ruber K. Female: Chipun ( Formosa) H. Sauter VII 1912, Ƥ, Atrichopogon ruber K., Kieffer det. Female: Paróe, nördl. Paiwan- Distr. ( Formosa) H. Sauter X.1912, Atrichopogon ruber . Female: Paróe, nördl. Paiwan-Distr. ( Formosa) H. Sauter X.1912, Atrichopogon ruber var. Kieffer det.
Discussion. Types of A. ruber and A. formosanus which had been deposited in the Museum of Natural History in Budapest were destroyed in the 1956 fire. Two males and three females of A. ruber preserved in SDEI, examined here, identified and reported by Kieffer (1921 and 1922) from Taiwan do not belong to the type series. The preserved specimens have reddish bodies, as noted by Kieffer, agree well with the original descriptions of females of A. ruber and therefore provide evidence of A. formosanus being its junior synonym. New synonymy.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Atrichopogon (A.) ruber Kieffer, 1916
Szadziewski, Ryszard & Dominiak, Patrycja 2009 |
Atrichopogon (Atrichopogon) formosanus:
Yu 2006: 341 |
Liu 2001: 30 |
Tokunaga 1940: 110 |
Atrichopogon formosanus
Kieffer 1918: 89 |
Atrichopogon ruber
Kieffer 1922: 155 |
Kieffer 1921: 563 |
Kieffer 1916: 86 |