Dima dima (Schaufuss, 1862)

Kundrata, Robin, Musalkova, Marketa & Kubaczkova, Magdalena, 2018, Annotated catalogue of the click-beetle tribe Dimini (Coleoptera: Elateridae: Dendrometrinae), Zootaxa 4412 (1), pp. 1-75 : 15

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4412.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22C58CA7-7D33-4D75-BB10-D52A37379902
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5985482
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A648DA77-914C-9B36-FF51-14BDFAD7DFEC
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Dima dima (Schaufuss, 1862)
status

Treatment

Celox dima Schaufuss, 1862: 202 .

Dima dima (Schaufuss, 1862) : Reitter (1906): 387.

Dima perezii Seidlitz, 1867: 178 .

Dima perezi: Candèze (1891a): 185 . See Remark below. Dima perezia: Hyslop (1921): 634 [unavailable name, incorrect subsequent spelling ( ICZN 1999, Αrt. 33.3)].

Type depositories. Celox dima: Described from four syntypes, sex unknown (Schaufuss 1862). Schimmel (1996a) designated the lectotype and paralectotypes from MFNB. Dima perezii : Type material unknown. Described from at least two males and two females (Seidlitz 1867).

Type localities. D. dima : Spain; D. perezii : Spain, Sierra de Guadarrama.

Distribution. Spain.

Literature. Schaufuss (1862): original description of D. dima ; Seidlitz (1867): original description of D. perezii ; Gemminger & Harold (1869): catalogue; Pérez Arcas (1872): catalogue; Schaufuss (1872): note; Marseul (1886): catalogue; Candèze (1891a): catalogue; Heyden et al. (1891): catalogue; Reitter (1906): taxonomic note; Schwarz (1906): catalogue; Hyslop (1921): catalogue; Schenkling (1927): catalogue; Fuente (1929): catalogue; Cobos (1961): review; Sánchez-Ruiz (1996): catalogue; Schimmel (1996a): catalogue; Cate (2007): catalogue; Zapata & Sánchez-Ruiz (2007): distributional notes; Schimmel & Platia (2008): review; Zapata & Sánchez-Ruiz (2012, 2013, 2014): catalogue; Löbl & Smetana (2013): taxonomic note.

Remark. Although D. perezii was dedicated to D. L. Pérez Arcas, Schaufuss (1862) used the spelling perezii . Although Candèze (1891a) used the spelling " perezi ", this was not followed by the subsequent authors (e.g., Sánchez-Ruiz 1996, Schimmel 1996a, Cate 2007), and therefore " perezii " has been in prevailing use.