Dima Charpentier, 1825
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4412.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:22C58CA7-7D33-4D75-BB10-D52A37379902 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5985439 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A648DA77-9148-9B32-FF51-15D0FB1BDAE1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dima Charpentier, 1825 |
status |
|
Genus Dima Charpentier, 1825
= Celox Schaufuss, 1862: 201 .
Type species. Dima elateroides Charpentier, 1825: 191 . = Celox dima Schaufuss, 1862: 202 .
Literature. Charpentier (1825): original description; Dejean (1833): catalogue; Germar (1839): catalogue; Küster (1844): species description; Redtenbacher (1849, 1858, 1874): catalogue; Lacordaire (1857): catalogue; Kiesenwetter (1858): remark; Schaufuss (1862): species description; Candèze (1863): review; Seidlitz (1867): species description; Gemminger & Harold (1869): catalogue; Pérez Arcas (1872): species description; Schaufuss (1872): note; Marseul (1886): note; Candèze (1891a): catalogue; Candèze (1891b): remark; Heyden et al. (1891): catalogue; Buysson (1893): catalogue; Reitter (1906): taxonomic note; Schwarz (1906): catalogue; Heyne & Taschenberg (1908): remark; Schilsky (1909): catalogue; Reitter (1911): catalogue; Petri (1912): catalogue; Fleutiaux (1916): species description; Hyslop (1921): catalogue; Schenkling (1927): catalogue; Tesař (1927): remark; Depoli (1928): remark; Fuente (1929): catalogue; Franz (1932): remark; Meischnigg (1934): species description; Jagemann (1940): catalogue; Fleutiaux (1943): species description; Jagemann (1950): note; Novak (1952): remark; Horion (1953): catalogue; Jagemann (1955): catalogue; Cobos (1961): review; Novak (1964): remark; Novak (1970): remark; Ôhira & Becker (1972): species description; Dajoz (1973): review; Rudolph (1973): description of larva; Gurjeva (1974): morphology; Dolin (1975): morphology; Rudolph (1978): description of larva; Suzuki (1979): species description; Dolin (1982): note; Chassain (1984): remark; Zeising (1984): remark; Guglielmi & Platia (1985): distributional note; Suzuki (1985): species description; Schimmel (1987): species description; Drovenik (1989): remark; Bouwer (1991b): catalogue; Schimmel & Cate (1991): remark; Schimmel & Platia (1991): species descriptions; Schimmel & Platia (1992a): species descriptions; Schimmel (1993): species descriptions; Platia (1994): catalogue; Lawrence & Newton (1995): catalogue; Sánchez-Ruiz (1996): catalogue; Schimmel (1996a): catalogue; Schimmel (1996b): species descriptions; Wurst (1997): species description; Schimmel (1999): species descriptions; Suzuki (1999): catalogue; Laibner (2000): catalogue; Thapa (2000): catalogue; Schimmel (2001): species descriptions; Hua (2002): catalogue; Chakraborty & Chakrabarti (2006): catalogue; Mertlik & Dušánek (2006): species description; Platia & Schimmel (2006): species description; Schimmel (2006b): species descriptions; Cate (2007): catalogue; Zapata & Sánchez-Ruiz (2007): distributional notes; Schimmel & Platia (2008): review; Platia & Gudenzi (2009): species description; Pedroni & Platia (2010): catalogue; Platia (2010): species description; Platia (2011): species description; Platia (2012): species descriptions; Zapata & Sánchez-Ruiz (2012, 2013, 2014): catalogue; Löbl & Smetana (2013): taxonomic note; Platia (2013): species descriptions; Gilgado et al. (2015): ecology, distribution; Mertlik et al. (2017): revision.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Dimini |
Dima Charpentier, 1825
Kundrata, Robin, Musalkova, Marketa & Kubaczkova, Magdalena 2018 |
Dima
Charpentier, 1825 : 191 |