Telegeusidae

Zaragoza-Caballero, Santiago & Zurita-García, Martín Leonel, 2015, A preliminary study on the phylogeny of the family Phengodidae (Insecta: Coleoptera), Zootaxa 3947 (4), pp. 527-542 : 538-539

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3947.4.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8FC05D43-724D-4A19-945F-6B5CE5DE2A0C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6098551

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A34F8783-2A57-0E6F-FF4B-FAAAFE35FB17

treatment provided by

Plazi (2016-04-19 05:07:41, last updated 2024-11-28 00:28:10)

scientific name

Telegeusidae
status

 

Taxonomy of Telegeusidae View in CoL View at ENA

Our study corroborates a close relationship between the Telegeusidae and Penicillophorinae. Ivie (2002) transferred Pseudokarumia Pic from Dascillidae to Telegeusidae , and provided a key to separate Telegeusis , Pseudotelegeusis and Pseudokarumia. Pseudokarumia species share the following characters diagnostic of the family ( Lawrence et al. 1999; Miller 2002): body narrow and large; labrum tri-lobed; last maxillary palpomere as long as antennae; pronotal disk with lateral impressions; elytra short; mesotibial spur serrate; abdomen with 8 ventrites. Ivie (2002) described Pseudokarumia having eyes small; antennal insertions separated, mesotibial spur serrated; postocular space (1.5 to 3 times the length of eye), maxillary palps long; pronotal disk with lateral impressions; elytra short: abdomen with eight ventrites. He also segregated Pseudotelegeusis Wittmer of Pseudokarumia Pic by the shape of antennae (serrate or filiform), distance between eyes and posterior margin of the head (reduced or wide), number of labial palpomeres (1 or 1–2). Our results support the transfer of Pseudokarumia to Telegeusidae and so corroborate the Ivie proposal.

The Telegeusidae View in CoL as designated by Leng (1920) is comprised of Telegeusis Horn View in CoL and Pseudotelegeusis Wittmer. Horn (1895) View in CoL originally described and included Telegeusis View in CoL in the Lampyridae View in CoL , and in the same publication this genus was associated with Drilini . Barber (1913) related Telegeusis View in CoL with Lymexyloidea and as a monobasic genus. This proposal was rejected by Martin (1931) who transferred it to Cantharidae View in CoL . King (1955) placed Atractocerus Palisot View in CoL in Lymexylidae View in CoL and suggested an association with Telegeusis View in CoL . Crowson (1955) related it to Phengodes View in CoL , based on the shared same configuration of male genitalia. Crowson (1972) defined the family Telegeusidae View in CoL based on the structure of the aedeagus and tentorium. Zaragoza (1990) noted that the reduced venation of the hind wing in the genera Telegeusis View in CoL , Pseudotelegeusis (Telegeusidae) View in CoL and Titthonyx LeConte ( Cantharidae View in CoL ) is a pattern shared with Walterius Zaragoza and Tarsakanthus Zaragoza (Phengodidae) . The same author noted that Telegeusis View in CoL , Cenophengus LeConte View in CoL , Distremocephalus Wittmer View in CoL and Walterius have two tentorial pits whereas the genera Phengodes View in CoL , Zarhipis LeConte, Tarsakanthus View in CoL , Pseudotelegeusis View in CoL and other taxa have one pit only. Lawrence & Newton (1995) defined the superfamily Elateroidea (incl. Phengodidae View in CoL and Telegeusidae View in CoL ) on wing configuration and they recognized two patterns, an elateroid type and another with reduced venation. This last pattern, presence of tentorial pits and antennal configuration are characters that suggest a close relationship between Telegeusis View in CoL and the subfamily Penicillophorinae. Recent work based on molecular evidence suggests different hypotheses about the relationships of Telegeusidae View in CoL , with Bocakova et al. (2007), Kundrata & Bocak (2011) and Kundrata et al. (2013) relating Telegeusis View in CoL with Omethidae View in CoL . In the study of Hunt et al. (2007), we found different hypotheses, with either under the parsimony criterion Telegeusis View in CoL is related with Phengodidae View in CoL , or under the Bayesian approach it is associated with Omethidae View in CoL . Kundrata et al. (2014) also associated Telegeusis View in CoL with Omethidae View in CoL and mentioned that the similar shape of labrum is a character that supports this relationship. The present study based on morphological evidence does not corroborate the conclusions of these molecular studies.

Jeng (2008) studied the evolution of neoteny in cantharoid-elateroid lineage with a full data set of 220 species and 410 characters ((incl. Omethidae View in CoL : Drilonius striatulus Kiensewetter , Omethes marginatus LeConte , O. rugiceps (Lewis) , Troglomethes leechi Fender , Malthomethes oregonus , Matheteus theveneti LeConte and Ginglymocladus luteicollis Van Dyke )), and Lawrence et al. (2011) focused in the phylogeny of the Coleoptera View in CoL based on morphological characters of adults and larvae (incl. Omethidae View in CoL : Matheteus theveneti LeConte ), both concluded that Telegeusis View in CoL is nested into Phengodidae View in CoL (and Omethidae View in CoL with Lycidae View in CoL and Cantharidae View in CoL respectively). All these works (molecular and morphological) lacked representatives of the Penicillophorinae.

Here, we suggest a close relationship between Phengodidae View in CoL and Telegeusidae View in CoL (both strictly from New World), specifically with the genera of the subfamily Penicillophorinae, demonstrated as monophyletic. The fact that Telegeusidae View in CoL +Penicillophorinae are nested into the clade that contains the terminals of external group could be an artifact of our sampling of outgroups. Telegeusidae View in CoL was recovered as non-monophyletic due to that Pseudotelegeusis View in CoL is sister to Penicillophorinae. Pseudotelegeusis View in CoL is characterized as having the maxillary palps 4- segmented, the last palpomere as long as the three previous, labial palps 1-segmented and one tentorial pit. The main difference between Pseudotelegeusis View in CoL and the penicillophorines is the length of the last maxillary palpomere relative to the basal ones.

Kundrata, R., Bocakova, M. & Bocak, L. (2013) The phylogenetic position of Artematopodidae (Coleoptera: Elateroidea), with description of the first two Eurypogon species from China. Contribution to Zoology, 82 (4), 199 - 208.

Kundrata, R., Bocakova, M. & Bocak, L. (2014) The comprehensive phylogeny of the superfamily Elateroidea (Coleoptera: Elateriformia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 76, 162 - 171.

Lawrence, J. F., Slipinski, A., Seago, A. E., Thayer, M. K., Newton, A. F. & Marvaldi, A. E. (2011) Phylogeny of the coleoptera based on morphological characters of adults and larvae. Annales Zoologici, 61 (1), 1 - 217.

Barber, H. S. (1913) Observations on the life history of Micromalthus debilis LeC. (Coleoptera). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 15, 31 - 38.

Crowson, R. A. (1955) The natural classification of the families of Coleoptera. Nathaniel Lloyd, London, 187 pp.

Crowson, R. A. (1972) A review of the classification of Cantharoidea (Coleoptera), with the definition of two new families, Cneoglossidae and Omethidae. Revista de la Universidad de Madrid, 21, 35 - 77.

Horn, G. H. (1895) Coleoptera of Baja California (Supplement 1). Proceedings of the California Academy of Science, Series 2, 5, 242 - 243.

Ivie, M. A. (2002) The transfer of Pseudokarumia Pic from Dascillidae (Karumiinae) to Telegeusidae, with a key to world genera of Telegusidae. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 56, 582 - 584. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1649 / 0010 - 065 X (2002) 056 [0582: TTOPPF] 2.0. CO; 2

Jeng, M. - L. (2008) Comprehensive phylogenetics, systematics, and evolution of neoteny of Lampyridae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Phd Thesis, Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas, 388 pp.

King, E. W. (1955) The phylogenetic position of Atractocerus Palis. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 9, 65 - 74.

Kundrata, R. & Bocak, L. (2011) The phylogeny and limits of Elateridae (Insecta, Coleoptera): is there a common tendency of click beetles to soft-bodiedness and neoteny? Zoologica Scripta, 40, 364 - 378.

Lawrence, J. F. & Newton, A. F., Jr. (1995) Families and subfamilies of Coleoptera (with selected genera, notes, references and data on family-group names). In: Pakaluk, J. & Slipinski, S. A. (Eds.), Biology, Phylogeny, and Classification of Coleoptera: Papers Celebrating the 80 th Birthday of Roy A. Crowson. Museum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, Warszawa, pp. 779 - 1006.

Lawrence, J. F., Hastings, A. M., Dallwitz, M. J., Paine, T. A. & Zurcher, E. J. (1999) Beetles of the world: a key and information system for families and subfamilies. CSIRO, Melbourne. CD-ROM version 1. 0 for MS-Windows.

Leng, C. W. (1920) Catalogue of Coleoptera from America North of Mexico. John D. Sherman, Jr. Mount Vernon, New York, 470 pp.

Martin, J. O. (1931) A new Telegeusis from Arizona (Coleoptera). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 8, 91 - 92.

Miller, R. S. (2002) Family 68. Telegeusidae Leng 1920. In: Arnett, R. H., Thomas, M. C., Frank, J. H. & Skelley, P. E. (Eds.), American beetles. Vol. 2. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 179 - 180.

Zaragoza-Caballero, S. (1990) La familia Phengodidae en los Tuxtlas , Veracruz, Mexico. Anales Instituto de Biologia Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (Zoologia), 61 (2), 307 - 312.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Telegeusidae