Celaetycheus abara, Polotow, Daniele & Brescovit, Antonio D., 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3637.2.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1B5343C3-0426-4014-9F12-E2346DDEEE08 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6148390 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/984B87B8-4178-FF96-FF00-DECCFDB2DB02 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Celaetycheus abara |
status |
sp. nov. |
Celaetycheus abara View in CoL new species
Figures 2–5 View FIGURE 2. A – D View FIGURE 3. A – D View FIGURE 4. A – F View FIGURE 5. A – D , 15 View FIGURE 15
Type material. Male holotype and female paratype from Fazenda Camurujipe, Mata de São João [12°31ʹ48ʺS, 38°17ʹ56ʺW], Bahia, Brazil, 2006, C. Machado, deposited in IBSP 85378 and IBSP 85380. Paratypes: 1 male and 2 females with the same data as the holotype, deposited in IBSP 85405 and 85414.
Additional material examined. BRAZIL: Bahia. Salvador [12°58ʹ16ʺS, 38°30ʹ39ʺW], Jardim Botânico de Salvador, 6 males and 10 females, X.2008 (IBSP 91780–91788, 140922 – 140928); Mata de São João [12°31ʹ48ʺS, 38°17ʹ56ʺW] Fazenda Camurujipe, 1 female, 2006, C. Machado. (IBSP 85375); Cachoeira [12°37ʹ0 4ʺS, 38°57ʹ21ʺW], Serra do São Francisco, Reserva do Peninha, 1 male, 2007 (IBSP); Cruz das Almas [12°40ʹ12ʺS, 39°06ʹ0 7ʺW], 1 male, 30.V –I 2.VII.2007, J. S. Costa (IBSP); Wenceslau Guimarães, Estação Ecológica Wenceslau Guimarães [13°34ʹ50ʺS, 39°42ʹ17ʺW], 2 males and 5 females, 23.X.2010, D. Polotow et al. (IBSP 162605, 162613); Valença [13°22ʹ12ʺS, 39°04ʹ22ʺW], RPPN Água Branca, 1 male and 1 female, X.2010, D. Polotow et al. (IBSP).
Etymology. “ Abará ” is a typical meal of the Bahia culinary tradition and also plays a role in the religious ritual of Candomblé. It is made with a special type of bean (fradinho) and served with pepper, dried shrimp, “ Vatapá ”, “ Caruru ” or salad. It is similar to “ Acarajé ”, but baked instead of fried.
Diagnosis. Males of Celaetycheus abara sp. nov. ( Figs 5A–B View FIGURE 5. A – D ) resemble those of C. flavostriatus ( Figs 1A–B View FIGURE 1. A – D ) by the shape of the embolus, but can be distinguished by the thin embolus and truncated retrolateral cymbial projection. Females of Celaetycheus abara sp. nov. resemble those of C. flavostriatus ( Fig. 11C View FIGURE 11. A – D ) by the elongate median sector and the presence of lateral lobes in the lateral sectors of the epigynum, but can be distinguished by the smaller head of spermathecae ( Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5. A – D ).
Description. Male (holotype IBSP 85378). Total length 4.5. Carapace 2.2 long, 2.0 wide. Eye diameters: AME 0.12, ALE 0.10, PME 0.20, PLE 0.20. Leg measurements: I: femur 2.1/ patella 0.9/ tibia 1.8/ metatarsus 1.8/ tarsus 1.0/ total 7.6; II: 2.1/ 0.85/ 1.7/ 1.7/ 0.9/ 7.25; III: 2.1/ 0.8/ 1.6/ 2.1/ 0.9/ 7.5; IV: 2.5/ 0.9/ 2.1/ 2.9/ 1.2/ 9.6. Leg formula 4132. Leg spination: tibia I v2-2 -2-2-2, p1-1, r1-1, II v2-2 -2-2-2, numerous prolateral small spines, r1- 1-1, III–IV v2-2 -2, p1-1, r1-1; metatarsus I–II v2-2 -2-1, p1-1-1, r1-1-1, III–IV v2-2 -2, p1-1-1, r1-1-1. Trochanter and femur of palp with short proximal spines; coxa and trochanter of leg I and II with short spines ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 C). Palp ( Figs 4A–D View FIGURE 4. A – F , 5A–B View FIGURE 5. A – D ): straight tibia, longer than cymbium; tibia with several rows of trichobothria; base of palpal trichobothria with 2 transversal grooves; retrolateral tibial apophysis with bifid tip; ventral tibial apophysis curved retrolaterally; additional tegular projection truncated.
Female (paratype IBSP 85380). Total length 4.4. Carapace not covered by scales ( Fig 2A View FIGURE 2. A – D ). Carapace 1.9 long, 1.7 wide. Eyes upon tubercles, with ctenoid pattern 2-4-2, AME and ALE smaller than PME and PLE ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2. A – D ). Eye diameter: AME 0.12, ALE 0.10, PME 0.18, PLE 0.19. Chelicerae with 5 retrolateral teeth ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2. A – D ). Endites with dense apical scopulae and subapical serrula ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2. A – D ). Leg measurements: I: femur 1.7/ patella 0.7/ tibia 1.5/ metatarsus 1.4/ tarsus 0.7/ total 6.0; II: 1.7/ 0.7/ 1.4/ 1.4/ 0.7/ 5.9; III: 1.6/ 0.7/ 1.2/ 1.6/ 0.7/ 5.8; IV: 2.1/ 0.7/ 1.7/ 2.3/ 1.0/ 7.8. Leg formula 4123. Leg spination: tibia I–II v2-2 -2-2-2, p0, r0, III v2-2 -2, p1-1, r1-1, IV v1 p-2-2, p1- 1, r1-1; metatarsus I–II v2-2 -2, p0, r0, III–IV v2-2 -2, p1-1-1, r1-1-1. Light tarsal scopulae ( Fig. 3A View FIGURE 3. A – D ). Tarsus with distal tarsal organ and 3 rows of trichobothria ( Fig. 3B View FIGURE 3. A – D ). Trichobothrial base with 2 transversal grooves on hood ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3. A – D ). Tarsal organ rounded and smooth, with oval aperture ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3. A – D ). Claw tufts present ( Fig. 3D View FIGURE 3. A – D ). Epigynum ( Figs 4E–F View FIGURE 4. A – F , 5C–D View FIGURE 5. A – D ): subpentagonal and elongated median sector; large base of spermathecae; thin and short fertilizations ducts; spermathecae with large head and curved base; head of spermathecae with pores, some bearing ducts.
Distribution. Mata de São João, Cachoeira, Cruz das Almas, Wenceslau Guimarães and Valença, State of Bahia, northeast Brazil ( Fig. 15 View FIGURE 15 B).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |