Trirogma caerulea Westwood, 1841
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1355492 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C23C70A7-AA1C-47C0-951A-D164E7B20001 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9459C42C-FFCB-FF98-FE05-FCE9FB6DE329 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina (2021-05-10 18:07:19, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-02 08:32:52) |
scientific name |
Trirogma caerulea Westwood, 1841 |
status |
|
Trirogma caerulea Westwood, 1841 View in CoL
( Figures 5 View Figure 5 (a–d), 6(a–d))
Trirogma caerulea Westwood, 1841: 152 View in CoL , ♂. Holotype or syntypes ‘neither the depository, nor whether the type is unique or not, are apparent from the very concise original description’: ♂, northern India: no specific locality (depository?).
Diagnosis
Male 12 mm long, female 12–15 mm long; antennal tubercles overhung as a single broad frontal lobe ( Figures 5 View Figure 5 (b), 6(b)); entirely metallic-blue in colour ( Figures 5 View Figure 5 (a), 6(a)); episternal sulcus crenulate forward; metasoma shortly petiolate ( Figures 5 View Figure 5 (a), 6(a)); occipital carina not extending onto venter of head or slightly so; pronotum with a pair of large pointed tubercles ( Figures 5 View Figure 5 (c), 6(c)); male with an additional pair of smaller tubercles on mesoscutum and a strong central tubercle on scutellum ( Figure 5 View Figure 5 (c)); frons sparsely punctate in female, with scattered smaller punctures in between; thickened side of frontal lobe deeply sulcate; S2 with bi-sinuate groove on basal third, terminating with tubercle ( Figure 6 View Figure 6 (d)).
Material examined: Saudi Arabia
1 ♂, Riyadh, Al-Hamra, SW, 5 January 2015 (leg. Y. Al Dryhim) [ KSMA]; 1 ♀, Riyadh, Al- Hamra, SW, 26 September 2016 (leg. Y. Al Dryhim) [ KSMA]; 1 ♀, Riyadh, Umm Salim, Al Emam Faisal Ibn Turki street (indoors), hand collected, 17 July 2016 (leg. Ahmed M. Soliman) [ KSMA]; 1 ♀, Riyadh, Al-Yasmin, King Salman Road, SW, 23 December 2013 (leg. M. Al Sufayan) [ KSMA]; 1 ♀, Riyadh, Al-Aqeeq, SW, 18 April 2015 (leg.?) [ EFC] .
Distribution
Widespread in the Oriental region, as far west as Iraq ( Abdul Rassoul 1976; Krombein 1979; Job and Olakkengil 2014); China ( Hua 2006), Iran ( Ebrahimi 2008, 2014), UAE (Sharja) ( Ohl 2011), Saudi Arabia (new record).
Family HETEROGYNAIDAE Genus Heterogyna Nagy, 1969
Heterogyna Nagy, 1969: 300 View in CoL . Type species: Heterogyna protea Nagy, 1969 View in CoL .
Daycatinca Argaman, 1985: 7 View in CoL . Type species: Heterogyna fantsilotra Day, 1984 View in CoL .
Daya Antropov and Gorbatovskiy, 1992: 58 (as a subgenus of Heterogyna View in CoL ). Type species: Heterogyna madecassa Day, 1984 View in CoL .
Key to the species of the genus Heterogyna View in CoL in the Arabian Peninsula
1. Fully winged, fore wing more or less reaching metasomal apex ( Figures 10 View Figure 10 (a), 13(a), 14(a)); pronotal collar distinctly wider than long ( Figures 10 View Figure 10 (a), 13(d)); antenna 13- segmented ............................................................................................................................. (males) 2
– Brachypterous, fore wing hardly reaching metasomal base ( Figures 7 View Figure 7 (a), 12(b)); pronotum as long as, or longer than, wide ( Figures 7 View Figure 7 (a), 12(a,e)); antenna 12- segmented ......................................................................................................................... (females) 3
2. Body almost entirely black, with legs partly yellow ( Figure 10 View Figure 10 (a)); head sparsely punctate, alutaceous between punctures ( Figure 10 View Figure 10 (b,c)); wing veins mostly unpigmented ( Figure 11 View Figure 11 (b)); fore wing with subrounded marginal cell ( Figure 11 View Figure 11 (b)), 1.2 × as long as wide; 1M cell delimited distally with extremely faint vein (1m-cu) ( Figure 11 View Figure 11 (b)); pronotal disc flattened, somewhat tightly articulating posterad with mesoscutum ( Figure 10 View Figure 10 (a)); posterior margin of S8 broadly and deeply emarginated; genitalia as in Figure 11 View Figure 11 (d–f) ...................................................................... H. saudita View in CoL sp. nov.
– Body bright yellow on different parts, mainly mesosoma, legs and parts of antenna, head and metasoma pale to dark brown ( Figure 13 View Figure 13 (a)); head sparsely punctate, integument smooth and shiny between punctures ( Figure 13 View Figure 13 (b)); wing veins well pigmented; marginal cell of fore wing distinctly elongated, at least 2× as long as wide ( Figure 13 View Figure 13 (e)); 1M cell delimited distally with well-pigmented vein (1m-cu) ( Figure 13 View Figure 13 (e)); pronotal disc angled, loosely articulating posterad with mesoscutum ( Figure 13 View Figure 13 (c)); posterior margin of S8 trilobate; genitalia as in Figure 13 View Figure 13 (f,g) ...................................................................................................... H. nocticola Ohl View in CoL
3. Head, mesosoma and legs red-brown (head with black tint), metasoma black ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (a–c)); antenna with scape, pedicel and F1–2 (except tip of F2) bright yellow, rest of flagellum dark brown to black ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (d,e)); head sparsely punctate, alutaceous to shagreened between punctures ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (b)); pronotum laterally with 6–7 distinct longitudinal carinae ( Figure 8 View Figure 8 (b)); mesoscutum with seven transverse well-defined carinae; fore wing densely setose, infuscate medially ( Figure 8 View Figure 8 (d)); hind wing sharply pointed apically ( Figure 8 View Figure 8 (d)) .......................................... H. saudita View in CoL sp. nov.
– Head, mesosoma and legs bright yellow, metasoma pale brown ( Figure 12 View Figure 12 (a,b)), antenna entirely yellow ( Figure 12 View Figure 12 (c)); head sparsely punctate, integument smooth and shiny between punctures; pronotum laterally without longitudinal carinae; mesoscutum at most with hardly indicated three transverse carinae; fore wing hyaline, sparsely setose; hind wing rounded apically ............. ............. H. nocticola Ohl View in CoL
Abdul Rassoul MS. 1976. Checklist of Iraq Natural History Museum insects collection. Univ Baghdad, Natl Hist Res Cent, Publ. 30: 1 - 41.
Antropov AV, Gorbatovskiy VV. 1992. Heterogyna polita sp. n. (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) - first representative of the subfamily Heterogynainae in the fauna of the USSR. Byulleten Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytatelei Prirody Otdel Biologicheskiy. 97: 53 - 59 (in Russian).
Argaman Q. 1985. Taxonomy of Heterogynaidae (Hymenoptera: Aculeata). Israel J Entomol. 19: 7 - 12. (Author' s previous name was C. G. Nagy).
Day MC. 1984. The enigmatic genus Heterogyna Nagy (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae; Heterogyninae). Syst Entomol. 9: 293 - 307.
Ebrahimi E. 2008. A contribution to the sphecid wasps of Iran (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae), including first record of six species. J Entomol Soc Iran. 28: 93 - 97.
Ebrahimi E. 2014. Insects of Iran. The list of Hymenoptera in the Hayk Mirazayans Insect Museum. Suborder: Apocrita, Superfamily: Apoidea (Spheciformes series), Families: Ampulicidae, Sphecidae, Crabronidae. Tehran: Iranian Res Inst Plant Prot, Insect Taxon Res Dep; Publ. No. 20, p 58 + 2 unnumbered.
Hua L. 2006. Superfamily Apoidea (Sphecoidea). Pages 274 - 299. In Hua L. List of Chinese insects. Guangzhon: Sun-Yat-sen University Press; Vol. 4, p. 539.
Job B, Olakkengil JL. 2014. A Study on the Diversity and Distribution of Sphecoid fauna in Thrissur District, Kerala, INDIA. J Environ Sci, Toxicol Food Technol. 8 (1): 13 - 17.
Krombein KV. 1979. Biosystematic Studies of Ceylonese Wasps, V: A Monograph of the Ampulicidae (Hymenoptera: Sphecoidea). Smithsonian Contrib Zool. 298: 1 - 29.
Nagy CG. 1969. A new taxon of the family Heterogynidae Latreille (Hym., Aculeata). Entomol Mitt Zool Staatsinst Zool Mus Hamburg. 64: 299 - 303 (Author' s name is now Q. Argaman).
Ohl M. 2011. Order Hymenoptera, family Ampulicidae. Arthropod fauna UAE. 4: 475 - 487.
Westwood JO. 1841. Nomenclature of the genus Chlorion of Latreiile. Ann Mag Nat Hist. 7: 435.
Figure 5. (a–d) Trirogma caerulea Westwood (male). (a) Habitus, dorsal view; (b) head, frontal view (frontal lobe indicated); (c) head and mesosoma, dorso-lateral view (frontal lobe and mesoscutal and scutellar tubercles indicated); (d) fore- and hind wings.
Figure 6. (a–d) Trirogma caerulea Westwood (female). (a) Habitus, dorsal view; (b) head, frontal view (frontal lobe indicated); (c) mesosoma, dorso-lateral view (pronotal tubercles indicated); (d) S2 (bisinuate groove indicated).
Figure 7. (a–e) Heterogyna saudita sp. nov. (female, holotype). (a) Habitus, dorso-lateral view; (b) head, frontal view (mandibular teeth indicated); (c) head, lateral view; (d) antennae (oval-shaped black spot on F2 indicated); (e) F2–F4 (oval-shaped black spot on F2 indicated).
Figure 8. (a–d) Heterogyna saudita sp. nov. (female, holotype). (a) Head, frontal view; (b) mesosoma, dorso-lateral view (longitudinal lateral carinae on pronotum, transverse carinae on mesoscutum, median tubercle on hind margin of dorsal propodeal face and 2ph–3ph indicated); (c) mesoscutum (transverse carinae indicated); (d) fore- and hind wings (basal portion of fore wing enlarged).
Figure 10. (a–d) Heterogyna saudita sp. nov. (male, paratype). (a) Habitus, lateral view (posterodorsal edge of pronotum indicated); (b) head, dorso-frontal view; (c) head, dorsal view; (d) mesosoma, dorsal view (parapsidal line and posterior carinae on mesoscutum and longitudinal median depression on propodeum indicated).
Figure 11. (a–f) Heterogyna saudita sp. nov. (male, paratype). (a) Metasomal terga; (b) fore wing and hind wing (part; marginal cell enlarged); (c) S6–8 (spindle-shaped swelling on S7 and double-edged elevation on S8); (d,e,f) Genitalia: ventral, dorsal and lateral aspects, respectively.
Figure 12. (a–f) Heterogyna nocticola Ohl (female, paratype). (a) Habitus, dorso-lateral view; (b) habitus, ventral view; (c) head (lateral view) and antennae; (d) head, fronto-lateral view; (e) mesosoma, dorso-lateral view; (f) paratype specimen label.
Figure 13. (a–h) Heterogyna nocticola Ohl (male, paratype). (a) Habitus, lateral view; (b) head, frontal view; (c) head, pronotum and mesoscutum (part), lateral view (pronotal postero-dorsal edge indicated); (d) mesosoma, dorsal view; (e) fore wing and hind wing (part; marginal cell indicated); (f) S6–8 (posterior edge of S8 indicated); (g) genitalia (partly extracted), dorsal aspect (aedeagus indicated); (h) paratype specimen label.
EFC |
Escola de Florestas |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Trirogma caerulea Westwood, 1841
Gadallah, Neveen S. 2017 |
Daya
Antropov AV & Gorbatovskiy VV 1992: 58 |
Daycatinca
Argaman Q 1985: 7 |
Heterogyna
Nagy CG 1969: 300 |
Trirogma caerulea
Westwood JO 1841: 152 |