Meta, C. L. KOCH, 1836

Álvarez-Padilla, Fernando & Hormiga, Gustavo, 2011, Morphological and phylogenetic atlas of the orb-weaving spider family Tetragnathidae (Araneae: Araneoidea), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 162 (4), pp. 713-879 : 773-775

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00692.x

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5492037

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7D5E87AD-C055-5538-FF1B-4C41D766F98D

treatment provided by

Valdenar

scientific name

Meta
status

 

META C. L. KOCH, 1836 View in CoL View at ENA ( FIGS 1D View Figure 1 , 4C View Figure 4 , 56–60 View Figure 56 View Figure 57 View Figure 58 View Figure 59 View Figure 60 )

Type species: Meta menardi Latreille, 1804 . The type specimens of Aranea menardi are lost ( Levi, 1980).

Diagnosis: Meta species can be distinguished from all other tetragnathid genera by the following combination of characters: abdomen as high as long ( Fig. 1D View Figure 1 ; Levi, 1980: figs 113–115); PMS anterior surface with more than 20 aciniform spigots ( Fig. 56C View Figure 56 ); epigynum ventrally projected with the copulatory openings posteriorly orientated ( Fig. 58A, B View Figure 58 ); fertilization ducts crossing over the spermathecae ( Figs 58C–F View Figure 58 , 60C View Figure 60 ); cymbial ectobasal process and cymbial ectomedian process present ( Fig. 59A View Figure 59 ); cymbial ectobasal process formed by a massive cuticular fold and cymbial ectomedian process shorter than half the cymbial width without macrosetae ( Fig. 59A–F View Figure 59 ); and by having the metaine embolic apophysis, when present, fused to the embolus base ( Fig. 60A, B View Figure 60 ).

Description: Female: body length c. 14.0 mm. Cephalic fovea formed by two deep longitudinal pits ( Fig. 57A View Figure 57 ). Ocular area lower than the carapace lateral margins ( Fig. 57B, D View Figure 57 ). Labium trapezoidal, wider than long and rebordered. Sternum as wide as long ( Fig. 57C View Figure 57 ). Anterior surface of chelicerae smooth, boss present ( Fig. 57B, D View Figure 57 ). Secondary eyes with canoe-shaped tapetum ( Levi, 1980: figs 122, 123). Eyes roughly subequal in size, lateral eyes slightly smaller and juxtaposed and on a tubercle ( Fig. 57A, B, D View Figure 57 ). Clypeus c. 1.5 times the AME diameter. Booklung cuticle grooved. Tracheal spiracle near the spinnerets ( Fig. 56A View Figure 56 ). ALS piriform spigots base rounded ( Fig. 56B View Figure 56 ). PLS with more than 20 aciniform spigots; distal end of the aggregate spigots embracing the tip of the flagelliform spigot ( Fig. 56D View Figure 56 ; Hormiga et al., 1995: fig. 19A–D). Epigynal plate protruded, copulatory openings posteriorly orientated and in the shape of longitudinal grooves ( Fig. 58A, B View Figure 58 ). Spermathecae walls well sclerotized ( Fig. 58C–F View Figure 58 ). Cuticle of copulatory ducts well sclerotized and shorter than half the spermathecae ( Figs 58F View Figure 58 , 60C View Figure 60 ). Wiehle (1967) proposed that M. menardi had a semi-entelegyne reproductive system, lacking fertilization ducts and, as in haplogyne reproductive systems, that the sperm must pass through the copulatory ducts to fertilize the eggs. Levi (1980: 40) mentioned that he could not verify that M. menardi lacked fertilization ducts, but did not state that this species had them. We found by means of SEM that M. menardi indeed has fertilization ducts; furthermore, these ducts cross over the spermathecae and copulatory duct junction ( Fig. 58D–F View Figure 58 ). Owing to this particular configuration it is difficult to differentiate both ducts in cleared epigyna ( Fig. 60C View Figure 60 ). Accessory glands distributed over the spermathecae, with gland openings arranged in groups ( Fig. 58E View Figure 58 ).

Male: body length c. 10.0 mm. Cephalothorax morphology as in females, except that the anterior cheliceral cuticle is rugose ( Fig. 57B, F View Figure 57 ). Abdomen cylindrical. PLS triplet reduced to nubbins ( Fig. 56E View Figure 56 ). Epiandrous fusules dispersed over a flat plate and immersed in pits ( Fig. 56F View Figure 56 ). Palpal patella with one macroseta; palpal tibia slightly longer than wide. Tegulum wider than long and slightly larger than the subtegulum ( Fig. 60B View Figure 60 ). Conductor well sclerotized and fused to the tegulum ( Fig. 60A View Figure 60 ). Embolic apophysis bearing several processes. Embolus short and well sclerotized ( Figs 59B View Figure 59 , 60A, B View Figure 60 ). Sperm duct with fewer than two switchbacks ( Fig. 60B View Figure 60 ).

Natural history: Meta includes 37 species with a Holarctic distribution ( Platnick, 2009). Meta menardi builds vertical webs with open hubs, few radii, and few spirals (fewer than 15) ( Fig. 4C View Figure 4 ). These spiders are usually found inside caves, near the entrance or deep inside, and in humid dark places such as tunnels, mines, and wells ( Levi, 1980). The egg-sac is white, large, drop-shaped, and hangs from a thread near the web ( Comstock, 1948; Levi, 1980). Meta menardi is the only species in which the biology is relatively well documented ( Ecker & Moritz, 1992). The web building behaviour of M. menardi was described by Eberhard (1982). Some studies of this species have covered aspects of its diet and predatory behaviour ( Yoshida & Shinkai, 1993; Smithers, 1996, 2005a), its distribution within its habitat ( Smithers, 1995), and observations on its dispersal biology and early life stages ( Smithers, 2005b; Smithers & Smith, 1998).

Taxonomy: North American Meta and some European and Japanese species have been revised ( Levi, 1980; Marusik, 1986; Yaginuma, 1986; Marusik & Koponen, 1992). Our description and diagnosis are based on the species included in Levi (1980), Marusik & Koponen (1992), and the illustrations of Roberts (1985) of the European species. We coded M. menardi for the phylogenetic analysis, by far the species that has been most intensively studied. We propose that Meta and Metellina are different genera, as suggested by previous authors ( Palmgren, 1978a; Levi, 1980; Coddington, 1990a; Marusik & Koponen, 1992). However, this hypothesis has not been cladistically tested with a sufficiently large taxonomic sample of both genera. The phylogenetic analysis that has included more Meta species to date included only Meta nigridorsalis Tanikawa, 1994 and M. reticuloides Yaginuma, 1958 ( Tanikawa, 2001: fig. 141B). This latter author proposed five synapomorphies for the genus Meta : male chelicerae larger than female chelicerae; large teeth on the chelicera fang furrow; sperm duct with switch backs; paracymbium large and modified; and epigynum weakly sclerotized ( Tanikawa, 2001). Other phylogenetic analyses have found Meta as sister either to a clade comprised by Metellina and Chrysometa ( Hormiga et al., 1995) or to a clade including Dolichognatha and Metellina ( Álvarez-Padilla, 2007) . The morphology plus behaviour data set recovered Meta as sister to a clade that includes Metellina and Dolichognatha ; when these data were combined with DNA sequences Meta came out as sister to a clade that includes the previous taxa plus Chrysometa and Diphya ( Fig. 144 View Figure 144 ).

PMS

Peabody Essex Museum

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Tetragnathidae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF