Pherusa plumosa ( Müller, 1776 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3886.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6ADD860C-D60C-448D-BC11-19EDB74013EE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7A4987D3-324E-FF96-FF37-FCBD2E7FFEF7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pherusa plumosa ( Müller, 1776 ) |
status |
|
Pherusa plumosa ( Müller, 1776) View in CoL restricted
Figure 1 View FIGURE 1
Amphitrite plumosa Müller, 1776:216 .— Fabricius, 1780:288–289.— Müller, 1789:16–17, Pl. 90, Figs 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 .— Grube, 1850:321.
Trophonia? goodsiri Johnston, 1840:371–373 View in CoL , Pl. 11, Figs 1–10 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 .
Siphonostomum plumosum . — Rathke, 1842:84–92, Pl. 6, Figs 1–7 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 (syn.), 1843:208–211, Pl. 11, Figs 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 .
Flemingia plumosa .— Johnston, 1846:447 (n. comb.).
Trophonia plumosa View in CoL .— Johnston, 1865:224–225, Pl. 19, Figs 1–10 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 (same descr. & illust. for T. goodsiri View in CoL ).
Stylarioides plumosa View in CoL .— Fauvel, 1907:20, 1909:6, 1927:116–117, Figs 41a–g (partim).— McIntosh 1915:89–96, Pl. 89, Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , Pl. 95, Figs 11–11b View FIGURE 11 Pl. 96, Figs 1–1a View FIGURE 1 , Pl. 104, Figs 1–1d View FIGURE 1 (syn.).— Rioja-LoBianco, 1931:96–98, Pls 28–29.—Wesenberg- Lund, 1950:35.— Kirkegaard, 1959:43 (partim).
Pherusa arctica Støp-Bowitz, 1948a:20–22 View in CoL , Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 .
Pherusa plumosa View in CoL .— Oken, 1815:377, Pl. 4, Sect. 6, Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 .— Cunningham & Ramage, 1888:674–676, Pl. 46, Fig. 39A–B (Anat.).— Støp-Bowitz, 1948a:13–18, Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 (syn., partim), 1948b:33–36, Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 .— Eliason, 1962:62–64, Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 (syn., neurochaetal variation).— Jirkov & Filippova, 2001:362–363, Figs 1–3 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 (syn.).
Type material. Northwestern Atlantic Ocean. Greenland. Neotype ( USNM 23257 ), 1.9 km NW of Conical Rock, Igannaq (76º05'07.12" N, 68º41'27.57" W), NW Greenland, 46-110 m, 22 Jul. 1940, R.A. Bartlett, coll. GoogleMaps
Additional material. Northwestern Atlantic Ocean. Greenland. Anterior fragment ( USNM 50948), off Little Hellefiske Bank, Western Greenland, Sta. 29F (64°54' N, 53°38' W), 79–85 m, 18 Aug. 1968, Blake & Dean, coll. (20 mm long, 5 mm wide, cephalic cage 10.5 mm long, 20 chaetigers; dorsal papillae on anterior chaetigers long, tapered, mostly without sediment grains, 4–5 series per segment; neurohooks from chaetiger 4, 4 per fascicle; notochaetae as long as ½ body width). Anterior fragment ( ZMUC 1793), Skovfjord, Greenland, RV Rink, Sta. 143 (no further data), 65–90 m, 3 Sep. 1912 (44 mm long, 8 mm wide, cephalic cage 15 mm long, 26 chaetigers; dorsal papillae on anterior chaetigers rounded, short, with fine sand particles, 4–5 series per segment; neurohooks from chaetiger 4, 4, then 5–6 per fascicle, 4 again towards the end of the fragment; notochaetae as long as ½ body width). One specimen ( ZMUC 1794), Lindenowfjord, Greenland, 400–600 m, 28 Jul. 1935, Bertelsen, coll. (50 mm long, 5 mm wide, cephalic cage 10 mm long, 52 chaetigers (regenerating from chaetiger 35); dorsal papillae on anterior chaetigers rounded with fine mud particles, 4–5 series per segment; neurohooks from chaetiger 4, 3–4 per fascicle, reduced to 2 in medial and posterior chaetigers; notochaetae as long as ½ body width). Canada. Four anterior fragments, damaged ( USNM 1609), off Newfoundland, RV Albatross, Cruise 1885, Sta. 2458 (46°48' N, 52°34' W), 163 m, 2 Jul. 1885 (12 mm wide; 7–9 notochaetae in chaetiger 10; all with neurohooks from chaetiger 4, including the smallest fragment with 3 mm body width; 4–7 neurohooks in anterior chaetigers, 3–5 in posterior ones per fascicle, body-size dependent; 4–5 series of large papillae on anterior chaetigers; notochaetae as long as ½ body width). One specimen ( USNM 8940), anterior fragment, many chaetae broken, off Halifax, Nova Scotia, RV Speedwell, Sta. 98-99, 33 m, 15 Sep. 1817, A.E. Verrill, id. as Trophonia affinis . Two specimens ( USNM 8952), Bedford Basin, Nova Scotia, RV FishHawk, Sta. 53, 64 m, 25 Aug. 1877, A.E. Verrill, id. as T. aspera (one with anterior end exposed, chaetae previously trimmed, used for description). One specimen ( USNM 15468), anterior fragment, outside of Hebron, Labrador, 110 m, gravel, 25 Aug. 1908. One specimen ( USNM 15469), anterior fragment, Nain, Labrador, 132 m, mud, 18 Aug. 1908. Three specimens ( USNM 23259), one anterior, two medial fragments, Kneeland Bay, Frobischer Bay, 31 m, 26 Aug. 1942, E.C. Rigby, coll. (dried out, body wall and chaetae dark brown). One specimen ( USNM 23263), without posterior end, Soak Point, Hebron Fjord, Labrador, 24 m, rock, pebble, sand, 31 Aug. 1949, D.C. Nutt, coll. One specimen ( USNM 1131519) broken in two parts, off Resolute, Cornwallis Island, Sta. 62-4003, B-10 (74°39.1' N, 94°16.8' W), 30 m, 9 Jul. 1962 (35 mm long, 6 mm wide, cephalic cage 10.5 mm long, 26 chaetigers; cephalic cage delicate; 11–12 notochaetae in medial chaetigers). One specimen ( USNM 1131520), broken in three parts, most papillae eroded, slightly dried out, chaetae reddish, Labrador, RV Resolute, Sta. 704 B7b (56º43' N, 81º38' W), 22 m, mud, 24 Jul. 1955 (86 (24+33+29) mm long, 4.5 mm wide, cephalic cage 16 mm long, 11 notochaetae in chaetiger 10). Northeastern United States. Five specimens ( USNM 8945), two complete, three without posterior ends, flaccid, Casco Bay, SE Monhegan, Maine, 132 m, 13 Sep. 1873, A.E. Verrill, id. as T. aspera (30–63 mm long, 3–6 mm wide, cephalic cage 5.5–12.5 mm long, 64–75 chaetigers, 7-10 notochaetae in chaetiger 10). One specimen ( USNM 8947), breaking in two, RV FishHawk, Sta. 170-171, 165 m, 24 Aug. 1878, A.E. Verrill id. as T. aspera (33 mm long, 3.4 mm wide, cephalic cage 8.5 mm long, 63 chaetigers, 7 notochaetae in chaetiger 10). One specimen ( USNM 8948), cephalic cage broken, Massachusetts Bay, US FishHawk, Sta. 205, 77 m, 16 Sep. 1878, A.E. Verrill, id. as T. aspera (50 mm long, 4 mm wide, cephalic cage 6 mm long, 74 chaetigers, 8 notochaetae in chaetiger 10). Two specimens ( USNM 8949), anterior fragments, RV Speedwell, Sta. 154, 70 m, 15 Aug. 1878, A.E. Verrill, id. as T. aspera . One specimen ( USNM 8955), broken in two, off Salem, Massachusetts, RV FishHawk, Sta. 32-33, 165 m, A.E. Verrill, id. as T. aspera (42 mm long, 4 mm wide, cephalic cage 10 mm long, 62 chaetigers, 8 notochaetae in chaetiger 10). One specimen ( USNM 15384), partially dehydrated, many papillae eroded, Massachusetts Bay, RV Speedwell, Sta. 219, 59 m, 18 Sep. 1878, A.E. Verrill, id. as T. aspera . Northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Germany, Baltic Sea. Three specimens ( USNM 288), very damaged, Kielerbucht, K. Moebius, coll., no further data (complete 32 mm long, 4 mm wide, cephalic cage 10 mm long, 55 chaetigers, 8 notochaetae in chaetiger 10). France. Two specimens ( MNHN 457), complete, tunic removed almost completely, Tatihou, Aug. 1895, P. Fauvel, coll. (72–81 mm long, 6 mm wide, cephalic cage 10–11 mm long, 66–69 chaetigers; anterior chaetigers without a mass of sediment grains; chaetiger 10 with 8–10 noto- and 4–5 neurochaetae). Four specimens ( MNHN 507), three complete, Tatihou, May–Jul. 1895, P. Fauvel, coll. (complete ones 55–69 mm long, 4.5–5.5 mm wide, cephalic cage 9–10 mm long, 62–72 chaetigers; anterior chaetigers without a mass of sediment grains; chaetiger 10 with 7–8 noto- and 3–4 neurochaetae).
Description. Neotype (USNM 23257) damaged, apparently fixed in ethanol, without posterior end ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ), some parapodia already removed. Body cylindrical, greyish; 49 mm long, 4 mm wide, cephalic cage 14 mm long, 36 chaetigers. Dorsal papillae with fine sediment particles, forming rounded tubercles, especially in anterior chaetigers ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 ); other papillae with less sediment or eroded, conical, elongate. Papillae arranged in 6–8 transverse, alternating rows.
Cephalic hood not exposed, branchial tips barely exposed (anterior end features observed in another specimen USNM 8952). Prostomium low cone, anterior eyes black, posterior ones not visible. Caruncle short. Lateral lips wide, projected, well developed; ventral and dorsal lips reduced.
Branchiae cirriform, thick, arrangement distorted by contraction ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ), four filaments in a row and two lateral groups with two filaments. Palps lost; palp keels rounded. Nephridial lobes lost, scars between external distal branchiae and proximal ones.
Cephalic cage chaetae 3x as long as body width. Chaetigers 1–2 forming cephalic cage, chaetiger 3 with chaetae ½–? as long as second chaetiger ones. Chaetae arranged as short series, dorsolateral in chaetigers 1-3, and following chaetigers. Chaetiger 1 with 18 noto- and 12 neurochaetae, chaetiger 2 with 15 noto- and 8 neurochaetae, chaetiger 3 with 14 noto- and 6 neurochaetae. Anterior dorsal margin of first chaetiger with an anteriorly directed lobe, papillae eroded (up to five in smaller specimens, USNM 8945).
Anterior chaetigers with dorsal papillae forming large sediment tubercles. Chaetigers 1–3 increasing in size posteriorly. Chaetal transition from cephalic cage chaetae to body chaetae abrupt; anchylosed, falcate blunt neurohooks start in chaetiger 4 ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 ). Gonopodial lobes not seen (rounded, low, dark greyish lobes on chaetigers 5 and 6 in USNM 15384).
Parapodia poorly developed, reduced low chaetal lobes; chaetae emerge from the body wall. Parapodia lateral; medial neuropodia ventrolateral. Notopodia and neuropodia with two postchaetal papillae, neuropodial ones smaller.
Medial notochaetae arranged in a È-pattern; all notochaetae multiarticulated capillaries, articles short basally, medium-sized medially, long subdistally and distally ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ), 10 per fascicle, as long as body width. Neurochaetae multiarticulated capillaries in chaetigers 1–3; simple anchylosed neurohooks from chaetiger 4, arranged in transverse series, 4–5 hooks per fascicle in anterior and medial chaetigers ( Fig. 1F View FIGURE 1 ).
Posterior end missing in neotype. Other specimens with posterior end truncate, conical, with anus terminal, without anal cirri.
Variation. The complete specimens show wide variation in several features as follows (measurements in millimetres):
Remarks. Pherusa plumosa ( Müller, 1776) was briefly described and has been recorded from many different and distant localities all over the world. The species is herein restricted to include specimens provided with golden chaetae, following the redescription by Müller (1789:16), and with papillae covered mostly by fine sediment particles, forming a globular smooth surface, as stated in the above redescription. Støp-Bowitz (1948a) followed Fauvel (1927) for the definition of the species. However, Fauvel indicated a very wide variation in type of sediment cover on dorsal papillae, ranging from sand to mud, as well as pigmentation, juveniles varied between dark orange or rusty yellow, and adults from greenish, dark brown or even iron gray. This is a very wide definition and must be restricted. Likewise, the synonymy by Pettibone (1956:563) should be re-evaluated; the records by Okuda (1937:52), Ushakov (1955:309; 1965:285), and by Hobson & Banse (1981:58) need confirmation (see below).
As Pherusa plumosa is the type species of Pherusa , its original description was brief. The original material was either never deposited or was destroyed, and requests to collection managers in major European museums led to the conclusion that there is no type material available ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.4) and therefore a neotype is designated to clarify the taxonomic status of the species ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.1–75.3.3). Further, the original description was brief but as stated above its description contains useful information to discriminate the species from similar ones such as the relative cephalic cage chaetae pigmentation, which is consistent with the neotype ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.5). The neotype was collected in northern Greenland, far away from the supposed type locality, but the oceanic conditions are comparable along the Western Greenland coast ( McGinley 2008). The neotype and other Greenlandic specimens are believed to be conspecific ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.6), and have been deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution ( ICZN 1999, Art. 75.3.7).
The number of notochaetae has been regarded as remarkably constant despite size variations ( Schlieper 1927:334); thus Baltic Sea specimens 1.3 cm long with 21 chaetigers, or those being 6.5 cm long with 45 chaetigers, have only 5 notochaetae in chaetiger 10. Therefore, there are apparently two forms involved under the same name, which has been regarded as very variable by Haase (1915:190); one is characterized by 5–6 notochaetae while the other has 7 or more notochaetae. The neotype and additional specimens all had seven or more notochaetae; those specimens having fewer notochaete may belong to another species. Further, the difference in the number of notochaetae in medial chaetigers is useful to separate similar species present along the Northwestern Atlantic Ocean ( Appy et al. 1980). Nevertheless, as indicated in the key above, because notochaetae are brittle, the relative type and sediment cover, together with number of neurochaetae, are more reliable as diagnostic features. Therefore, specimens which can be referred to as P. plumosa have fine particles on body papillae, while those with large sediment particles, often a single sand grain per papilla, and along anterior, medial and posterior regions, are herein regarded as members of P. incrustata Quatrefages, 1866 , reinstated (see below). Specimens previously regarded as members of P. plumosa but having few notochaetae per bundle belong in Pherusa obscura Quatrefages, 1849 , reinstated (see below). On the other hand, this revised definition of Pherusa plumosa ( Müller, 1776) , resembles P. nipponica n. sp. because their papillae are covered by fine sediment particles. The main differences between P. plumosa and P. nipponica refer to the relative number of transverse series of papillae, and the shape and colour of their neurohooks; thus, P. plumosa has 6–8 transverse series of papillae and neurohooks brownish, slightly falcate, whereas P. nipponica has 3–4 series and their neurohooks are paler and markedly curved.
Earlier Støp-Bowitz (1948a:20–24) had suggested that size was a useful character to split and describe two similar species: P. arctica and P. falcata , being 2–20 mm long. Both species were provided with apparently pseudocompound neurohooks along a few anterior chaetigers. Eliason (1962:62) showed that very small specimens of P. plumosa have these chaetae and he regarded P. arctica as a junior synonym. Type material was not available for this study but his conclusion is herein supported. Pherusa falcata , however, is newly combined and transferred to Lamispina n. gen. (see below).
Neotype locality. Conical Rock , Igannaq, Northwestern Greenland, 50–120 m depth.
Distribution. The species was described from Southwestern Greenland; it extends into temperate environments, especially in the Atlantic Ocean, in 22–600 m depth. Other records are questionable but this wide distribution probably includes more than one biological species and with the available characters they cannot be separated.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
ZMUC |
Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen |
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pherusa plumosa ( Müller, 1776 )
Salazar-Vallejo, Sergio I. 2014 |
Pherusa arctica Støp-Bowitz, 1948a:20–22
Stop-Bowitz, C. 1948: 22 |
Stylarioides plumosa
Kirkegaard, J. B. 1959: 43 |
Rioja-LoBianco, E. 1931: 96 |
Fauvel, P. 1927: 116 |
McIntosh, W. C. 1915: 89 |
Fauvel, P. 1909: 6 |
Fauvel, P. 1907: 20 |
Trophonia plumosa
Johnston, G. 1865: 224 |
Flemingia plumosa
Johnston, G. 1846: 447 |
Siphonostomum plumosum
Rathke, H. 1842: 84 |
Trophonia? goodsiri Johnston, 1840:371–373
Johnston, G. 1840: 373 |
Pherusa plumosa
Jirkov, I. A. & Filippova, A. V. 2001: 362 |
Eliason, A. 1962: 62 |
Stop-Bowitz, C. 1948: 13 |
Cunningham, J. T. & Ramage, G. A. 1888: 674 |
Oken, L. 1815: 377 |
Amphitrite plumosa Müller, 1776:216
Grube, A. E. 1850: 321 |
Muller, O. F. 1789: 16 |
Fabricius, O. 1780: 288 |
Muller, O. F. 1776: 216 |