Polycaena minor Forster, 1951
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4105.6.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:47202F2D-9A6B-45BA-A99E-1E723C6E542B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6056563 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/793DB868-311D-FF9D-FF18-F916B142FCE6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Polycaena minor Forster, 1951 |
status |
stat. nov. |
Polycaena minor Forster, 1951 , new status
( Figs. 23–24 View FIGURES 1 – 24 , 49 View FIGURES 41 – 49 , 54 View FIGURES 50 – 58 , 63 View FIGURES 59 – 65 , 72 View FIGURES 66 – 72 , 79 View FIGURES 73 – 79 , 87 View FIGURES 80 – 88 )
Polycaena lua minor Forster, 1951: 63 , pl. 4, fig. 3 for ♂ holotype, TL: Batang.
? Polycaena matuta shii Huang, 2014: 154 , figs. 31–32 for ♀♀, TL: E of Mila, Linzhi, SE Tibet.
Material. CHINA: Sichuan province: 1♂, on road from Batang to Litang, Haizi-shan, 4680 m, 10.VII.2012, H.-L. Shi & Y. Liu leg.; Qinghai province: 1♂, Yushu Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Jiegu, 3700 m, 16.VII.2011, K. Song leg.
Identification. The photos of the holotype were published in the original description (Forester, 1951). The male specimen collected from the type locality ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 1 – 24 ) has all details of wing-pattern in common with the holotype. The male specimen from Yushu, Qinghai possesses the same genital characters as the one from Batang.
Wing-pattern. This species has its wing-pattern generally similar to that of P. l u a, but differs from the latter in having an additional spot at anal half in the discocellular cell of hindwing underside.
Male genitalia. Uncus in dorsal view has no branch. Fenestrula is not present at middle. Valva is elongate, and has no ventral branch found in P. l a m a. Ampulla of valva is slightly overlapped by harpe. Harpe of valva has no inner process rising from sacculus. Posterior branches of central plate are more slender than in all other species in dorsal view, and are depressed in lateral view. Juxta has dorsal part extending both anteriorly and posteriorly in lateral view. Phallus in lateral view has a dorsal corner. Coecum penis in dorsal view is not expanded laterally.
Remarks. This taxon is no doubt an independent species from P. l u a, with significant differences from the latter in male genitalic morphology. Since it is allopatric with P. l ua and has never been collected from NE Qinghai, the type locality of P. lua , there is no confusion in identification of these two species yet.
The holotype and the sole paratype of P. matuta shii Huang, 2014 may represent the females of P. minor , and in that case P. matuta shii should be treated as a junior synonym of P. minor . P. minor has been known only on the male specimens whilst P. matuta shii has been known only on the female specimens; both taxa are very similar to each other in the wing-patterns on the underside.
Distribution. Extreme west of Sichuan and SE Qinghai.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Polycaena minor Forster, 1951
Huang, Hao & Li, Yu-Fei 2016 |
Polycaena lua minor
Forster 1951: 63 |