Tachycampoid
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.591 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5CB610DA-F9C9-4213-80E8-8A8901895A18 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3664042 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/737287D7-FFD5-EC43-FF3B-FCE6FAA2FBED |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tachycampoid |
status |
|
Tachycampoid phyletic lineage
Other genera related to Plusiocampinae , the tachycampoid phyletic lineage
Bareth & Condé (1981) originally proposed a unique and different tachycampoid phylogenetic lineage (“lignée Tachycampoïde”) for a number of previously described genera: Tachycampa Silvestri, 1936 with one species from a cave in the western Rif Mountains ( Silvestri 1936); Paratachycampa Wygodzinsky, 1944 with three species, one from a cave in Nuevo León ( Mexico) and two from several caves in the eastern Iberian Peninsula ( Wygodzinsky 1944; Bareth & Condé 1981); Juxtlacampa Wygodzinsky, 1944 with two species, one from a cave in Guerrero ( Mexico) and another from a cave in Alta Verapaz ( Guatemala) ( Wygodzinsky 1944); and Jeannelicampa Condé, 1955 with one species from caves in Tell Atlas ( Algeria) ( Condé 1952, 1954c). Much later, Condé (1982) proposed a new genus within this phyletic lineage, Oncinocampa Condé, 1982 , for a subterranean species from the north of the Iberian Peninsula and another one from Sardinia ( Condé 1981b, 1982). A few years later, the diversity of Oncinocampa was increased with four more species, two from the same karst region in the Cantabric Mountain Range on the northern Iberian Peninsula ( Sendra & Condé 1988, Bareth 1989) and two from caves in the Americas, one near São Paulo, Brazil ( Condé 1997) and another in Veracruz, Mexico ( Sendra et al., 2016). The number of species in Tachycampa has also been expanded with three new cave-dwelling species from Mexico ( Sendra et al. 2016) ( Fig. 209 View Fig ).
Diagnosis ( Bareth & Condé 1981; Sendra et al. 2016)
Three main morphological features support the phyletic line of the tachycampoid group, although exceptions exist. First, the elbow-like claws with lateral crests (absent in Jeannelicampa stygia Condé, 1952 ). Second, the notal macrosetal formula: pronotum with 3+3 ma, la and lp; mesontum with 2+2 ma and la; metanotum with 1+1 ma or fewer (with only 1+1 lp pronotal macrosetae in Oncinocampa genuitei ( Bareth, 1989) ; Paratachycampa hispanica Bareth & Condé, 1981 and P. penyoensis Bareth & Condé, 1981 have an extra lateral anterior macroseta). Finally, dorsal macrosetae are absent from the femur, with the exception of a small, thin macroseta in O. asonensis Sendra & Condé, 1988 and O. paclti Condé, 1981 . Additionally, all species inhabit subterranean ecosystems, except O. paclti , which has non-troglomorphic features.
Taxonomic key to Euro-Mediterranean tachycampoid genera and species
1. 2+2 macrosetae on urosternite VIII................................................................................................2
– 1+1 macrosetae on urosternite VIII................................................................................................4
2. 9+9 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII .......... Paratachycampa penyoensis Bareth & Condé, 1981
– 6+6 or 7+7 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII................................................................................3
3. 6+6 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII ................................... Jeannelicampa stygia Condé, 1952
– 7+7 macrosetae on urosternites II–VII ......... Paratachycampa hispanica Bareth & Condé, 1981
4. Pretarsal claws without lateral crests ......................................... Jeannelicampa stygia Condé, 1952
– Pretarsal claws with lateral crests....................................................................................................5
5. Pretarsal claws with large lateral crests, but without backward overhang ...................................... .................................................................................................. Tachycampa lepineyi Silvestri, 1936
– Pretarsal claws with small lateral crests.........................................................................................6
6. Appendages of urosternite I in adult males piriform or subtrapezoidal..........................................7
– Appendages of urosternite I in adult males short, thick and large...................................................8
7. Appendages of urosternite I in adult males piriform ......................................................................... ............................................................................... Oncinocampa asonensis Sendra & Condé, 1988
– Appendages of urosternite I in adult males subtrapezoidal ..... Oncinocampa paclti ( Condé, 1981)
8. 1+1 lateral anterior macrosetae or submacrosetae on pronotum, mesonotum and metanotum; 1+1 lateral anterior pronotal macrosetae or submacrosetae ............. Oncinocampa falcifer Condé, 1982
– Without notal macrosetae, except 1+1 long lateral posterior pronotal macrosetae ......................... .................................................................................................. Oncinocampa genuitei Bareth, 1989
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |