Leobodes praeconcavus, Chen, Jun & Wang, Hui-Fu, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.176507 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6240438 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/721787D5-FFEB-FF94-F58E-E15C6BE5E2A0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Leobodes praeconcavus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Leobodes praeconcavus View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs. 5–12 View FIGURES 5 – 8 View FIGURES 9 – 12 , 16–17 View FIGURES 13 – 17 )
Material examined: Holotype: adult (in alcohol, CJ-01-98), CHINA: Xizang Autonomous Region: Nyalam County, Zham (27.9°N, 85.9°E), 2670m, 3 Sept., 2001, Jun Chen, from litter under shrub.
Etymology. This specific epithet “ praeconcavus ” is a combination of “prae-” from the Latin for “anterior” and “concavus” from the Latin for “concaved”, which refers to the strongly concave anterior margin of prodorsal condyles of this species.
Diagnosis. Adult. Total length 665Μm. Prodorsal setae ro, le and in slightly barbed distally, transverse ridge connecting insertions of le not indented medially. Anterior margin of prodorsal condyles strongly concave, almost U-shaped. Distance between intersections of inner margins of prodosal and humeral condyles longer than vertical distance between intersection of posterior margins of prodorsal condyles and anterior margin of notogaster. Ten pairs of notogastral setae present, thick, long, smooth and tapered. Surface of notogaster smooth.
Adult. Measurements: total length 665Μm, notogastral length 420Μm, notogastral width 450Μm.
Prodorsum. Prodorsal setae ro, le and in barbed slightly on distal half ( Figs. 5, 8 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ); ro inserted dorsally on prodorsum; le inserted on tubercle anteriorly on lamella, arched transverse ridge (not indented) connecting tubercles ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ); in inserted near lateral margin of prodorsum; ro length 190Μm, distance between ro 65Μm, le length 180Μm, distance between le 85Μm, in length 165Μm, distance between in 200Μm. Bothridial seta curved, sickle-formed, weakly swollen in middle portion, length 205Μm. Tutorium (tu) well developed, pointed distally. Pair of plate-shaped prodorsal condyles arise posterolaterally and extend anterior-medially to interlock medially, their mutual anterior margin curved backward strongly, almost U-shaped ( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 8 , 16, 17 View FIGURES 13 – 17 ), several small verrucous tubercles present on its anterior and lateral margins.
Notogaster. Pair of large triangular humeral condyles present and interlocking with prodorsal condyles. Area circumscribed by inner margin of condyles concave and approximately hexagon-shaped ( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 8 , 17 View FIGURES 13 – 17 ). Distance between intersections of inner margins of prodosal and humeral condyles (DIPN) longer than vertical distance between intersection of posterior margins of prodorsal condyles and anterior margin of notogaster (DVPN). Surface of notogaster smooth. Ten pairs of notogastral setae present, thick, long, smooth and tapered ( Figs. 5, 7 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ); setae c inserted on inner margin of humeral condyle, basal half directed anteromedially, distal half curved posteriorly ( Figs. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 8 , 16 View FIGURES 13 – 17 ). Setae length: c 170Μm, la 100Μm, lm broken, lp 110Μm, h1 100Μm, h2 105Μm, h3 100Μm, p1 55Μm, p2 65Μm, p3 105Μm.
Ve nt e r. Setae ad3 and ad2 inserted almost at same level with anterior and posterior margin of anal opening, respectively, ad1 inserted posterior to posterior margin of anal opening ( Figs. 6, 7 View FIGURES 5 – 8 ).
acters mentioned in the “Remarks” of L. carinatus described above. It differs from L. mirabilis by: in L. praeconcavus , anterior margin of prodorsal condyles strongly concave, almost U-shaped, distance between intersections of inner margins of prodosal and humeral condyles longer than vertical distance between intersection of posterior margins of prodorsal condyles and anterior margin of notogaster; in L. mirabilis , anterior margin of prodorsal condyles almost straight, distance between intersections of inner margins of prodosal and humberal condyles shorter than vertical distance between intersection of posterior margins of prodorsal condyles and anterior margin of notogaster. Differences between L. praeconcavus and L. carinatus are given in the “Remarks” of L. carinatus described above.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |