Microsphaeropsis cytisi (W.J.Li & K.D.Hyde), 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2022v43a7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7815350 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/71328784-9E6B-CB76-FEF3-2D85FECEE9E4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2023-04-11 02:06:04, last updated 2024-11-27 01:02:58) |
scientific name |
Microsphaeropsis cytisi (W.J.Li & K.D.Hyde) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Microsphaeropsis cytisi (W.J.Li & K.D.Hyde)
M.Mehrabi-Koushki, K.D.Hyde & Jayaward., comb. nov.
Neomicrosphaeropsis cytisi W.J.Li & K.D.Hyde View in CoL , Fungal Diversity 80: 38 ( Hyde et al. 2016).
MYCOBANK. — MB 841487.
DESCRIPTION
See Hyde et al. (2016).
NOTES
Hyde et al. (2016) introduced Neomicrosphaeropsis cytisi for a saprobic fungus isolated from dead stem of Cytisus sp. (Fabaceae) in Italy. The analyses of combined LSU, ITS, tub 2 and rpb 2 sequence data for the Microsphaeropsis complex revealed that the type strain of Neomicrosphaeropsis cytisi (MFLUCC 13-0396) clustered within Microsphaeropsis lineage ( Fig. 1 View FIG ). Therefore, we transfer Neomicrosphaeropsis cytisi to Microsphaeropsis . Nucleotide comparison of Microsphaeropsis cytisi (W.J.Li & K.D.Hyde) M.Mehrabi-Koushki, K.D.Hyde & Jayaward. , comb. nov. with Neomicrosphaeropsis species showed a difference of 0.6% (3/521 bp) in the LSU region, 3% (13/431 bp) in the ITS and 10.5% (46/438 bp) in the rpb 2.
HYDE K. D., HONGSANAN S., JEEWON R., BHAT D. J., MCKEN- ZIE E. H. C., JONES E. B. G., PHOOKAMSAK R., ARIYAWANSA H. A., BOONMEE S., ZHAO Q., RICHTER C., THONGBAI B., STADLER M. & ZHU L. 2016. - Fungal diversity notes 367 - 490: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80: 1 - 270.
FIG. 1. — The ML phylogenetic tree obtained from the combined LSU-ITS, tub2 and rpb2 sequence data of strains belonging to the Microsphaeropsis complex. The tree was rooted to Vacuiphoma ferulae L.W.Hou, L.Cai & Crous. Taxa retrieved or reclassified newly are shown with red dots. Bootstrap values obtained in maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) analyses ≥ 0.50% and Bayesian posterior probability values (BYPP) ≥ 0.90% are shown at the nodes, respectively. The scale bar shows the expected number of changes per site. T letter indicates type strains.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |