Conicobruchus decoratus ( Fåhraeus, 1871 ), Fahraeus, 1871
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3895.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:ACF6C45F-E37F-4483-9001-17634FCE5990 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5668835 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C398325-2777-FFA4-FF04-FF75FD4EFBAF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Conicobruchus decoratus ( Fåhraeus, 1871 ) |
status |
|
Conicobruchus decoratus ( Fåhraeus, 1871)
Bruchus decoratus Fåhraeus, 1871:448
Bruchus decoratus atrodorsalis Decelle, 1960:137 , syn. nov. Bruchus nigromaculatus Pic, 1929 (synonymy in Decelle 1961: 8) Bruchidius decoratus Decelle, 1975:21
Conicobruchus decoratus: Kergoat et al., 2011:756
Material examined. Type (male) of Bruchus nigromaculatus : Republic of South Africa: Port St John, v.1923, R.E. Turner [dissected, genitalia on card in DMHF].
Other material: Botswana: 1♀, Leribé, 1923 (R. Ellenberger) [ MNHN]. Republic of Mozambique: 1♂, Nova Chupanga, v.1928 (P. Lesne) [ MNHN]. Tanzania: 2♂ (C. Conrads) [ MNHN]. Zambia: 1♂, 2♀, Samununga, 13°37.156’S 24°07.349’E, 1091m, 19.iii.2012, ex Crotalaria aculeata claessensii , [1♂ 0 2012, specimen GK446 used for DNA extraction] (B. Le Ru) [ CBGP].
Body black, with large red parts; head (including antennae), thoracic sternites and legs always black, pronotum and abdomen always red. Elytra entirely black in some specimens, but usually red with more or less extensive black markings ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ): usually base, humerus, a round spot at basal fourth in interstriae 2 to 4, apical fourth to third of elytra, often also along suture.
Other important morphological traits are as follows: pronotum 1.5 times wider at base than long, its sides almost straight, slightly sinuated, not constricted anteriorly into a neck; moderately lobed posteriorly and laterally, with dense white setation on lobes; strial punctures small, circular, closely spaced, interstriae finely imbricate, shining, with minute punctures; male antennae serrate.
Male genitalia. Median lobe ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 7 ) of moderate length, stout (maximum width excluding basal hood / total length = 0.15), not widened apically, basal hood moderately widened, not concave posteriorly; ventral valve large, subtriangular, bearing apically numerous sensillae and basally two lateral groups 9–12 setae; no hinge sclerite; internal sac anteriorly with minute spinules and scales, then densely lined with strands of hyaline and sclerotized spines; apical ampoule devoid of any ornamentation, gonopore not sclerotized; basal strut ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5 – 7 ) narrow, without keel; lateral lobes cleft to about 90% their length; apex modified, with two lips, the dorsal one bearing about 15 setae, the ventral one densely lined with long setation.
Biology. Zambian material was reared from pods of Crotalaria aculeata subsp. claessensii. This constitutes the first report on its biology.
Distribution. Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo ( Decelle, 1960), Republic of Mozambique, Republic of South Africa, Tanzania and Zambia.
Discussion. Conicobruchus decoratus can be distinguished from other members of the C. strangulatus species group by the shape of the pronotum and structure of male genitalia. Contrary to the other species of the group, in C. decoratus the pronotum is short, its side non-concave and it is not compressed anteriorly into a neck ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Male genitalia are also very distinctive, being less widened anteriorly and the basal strut not concave posteriorly ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5 – 7 ).
Specimens with black elytra were considered as a subspecies (atrodorsalis) by Decelle (1960). However the pattern of elytral coloration is extremely variable, ranging from red with few black markings to entirely black. Because of this high level of variability we chose to establish the synonymy Bruchus decoratus atrodorsalis Decelle = Conicobruchus decoratus (Fåhraeus) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Conicobruchus decoratus ( Fåhraeus, 1871 )
Le Ru, Bruno P., Delobel, Alex, György, Zoltán, Genson, Gwenaëlle & Kergoat, Gael J. 2014 |
Conicobruchus decoratus: Kergoat et al., 2011 :756
Kergoat 2011: 756 |
Bruchus decoratus atrodorsalis
Decelle 1975: 21 |
Decelle 1960: 137 |
Bruchus decoratus Fåhraeus, 1871 :448
Fahraeus 1871: 448 |