Chelipoda Macquart, 1823, 1537
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1537.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A078784-BA62-FFBB-AFFE-FF4F184BF160 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chelipoda Macquart, 1823 |
status |
|
Genus Chelipoda Macquart, 1823 View in CoL View at ENA
Chelipoda Macquart, 1823: 148 View in CoL . Type species: Tachydromia mantispa Macquart, 1823: 149 , misidentification (original description) [= vocatoria Fallén, 1816 View in CoL ].
Phyllodromia Zetterstedt, 1837: 31 View in CoL . Type species Empis melanocephala Fabricius View in CoL (des. Rondani, 1856: 150). Chiromantis Rondani, 1856: 148 View in CoL (also as Chyromantis , loc. sit.: 148). ( Chiromantis View in CoL , preocc. Peters, 1854). Type species Tachydromia vocatoria Fallén, 1816 (orig. des.)
Lepidomya Bigot, 1857: 557 , 563. Type species: Tachydromia mantispa Panzer, 1806 (= Empis melanocephala Fabricius, 1794 View in CoL ). Junior synonym of Phyllodromia Zetterstedt, 1837 View in CoL .
Thamnodromia Mik, 1886: 278 . (unnecessary name change for Phyllodromia Zetterstedt View in CoL ).
Litanomyia Melander 1902: 231 . Type species: Sciodromyia mexicana Wheeler & Melander (Coquillet, 1903: 252) . Lepidomyia Kertesz, 1909: 117 View in CoL . (unjustified emendation of Lepidomya Bigot, 1857 ).
Diagnosis: A genus of Empididae distinguished from other genera of Hemerodromiinae by a combination of the following characters: (1) head with distinct postocular setae; (2) postpedicel usually longer than broad and with longer arista, if postpedicel about as long as broad then arista obviously much longer [the arista is sometimes very short or absent but in such cases the postpedicel is considerably lengthened]; (3) laterotergite with setae; (4) thorax strongly arched below, in lateral view, vertical distance between lower corner of katepisternum and a hypothetical mid line extrapolated posteriorly from base of front coxa equal or slightly less than distance between mid line and top of scutum; (5) scutum with distinct setae; (6) male genitalia reflexed anterodorsally, often distinctly so; (7) cell dm closed, crossvein dm-cu present; (8) cell cup (when present) as long as or slightly longer than cell bm; (9) cell cup apically rounded (CuA 2 evenly recurrent.- C. modicagroup ) or posteroapically pointed ( C. consignata -group & C. trepida -group); (10) CuA 2 not extending to posterior margin of wing;
The genus Chelipoda is readily recognised using the keys of Collin (1928, 1961) or Steyskal & Knutson (1981). New Zealand Chelipoda are rather structurally diverse, particularly in regard of males which frequently exhibit extreme development of secondary characters which do not always fit well with current definitions of the genus. The phylogenetic relationships of species currently assigned to Chelipoda will be discussed later.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Chelipoda Macquart, 1823
Published, First 2007 |
Litanomyia
Kertesz, K. 1909: 117 |
Melander, A. L. 1902: 231 |
Thamnodromia
Mik, J. 1886: 278 |
Lepidomya
Bigot, J. M. F. 1857: 557 |
Phyllodromia
Rondani, C. 1856: 150 |
Rondani, C. 1856: 148 |
Zetterstedt, J. W. 1837: 31 |
Chelipoda Macquart, 1823: 148
Macquart, J. 1823: 148 |
Macquart, J. 1823: 149 |