Itostenhelia polyhymnia, Karanovic & Kim, 2014

Karanovic, Tomislav & Kim, Kichoon, 2014, New insights into polyphyly of the harpacticoid genus Delavalia (Crustacea, Copepoda) through morphological and molecular study of an unprecedented diversity of sympatric species in a small South Korean bay, Zootaxa 3783 (1), pp. 1-96 : 65

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3783.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E6155BDC-AEAE-475D-BC83-61B3B863344C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4910578

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6878D460-FFEE-FF93-64D0-FC5901ECF9BB

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Itostenhelia polyhymnia
status

sp. nov.

Itostenhelia polyhymnia sp. nov. L-form

( Fig. 42 View FIGURE 42 )

Locality. South Korea, South Sea , Gwangyang Bay, sampling station 10, muddy sediments, 34.920944°N 127.785528°E ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ) GoogleMaps .

Specimens examined. One female dissected on one slide (collection number NIBRIV0000232698), two females destroyed for DNA sequence (one amplification successful, Code 0271), 30 July 2012, leg. K. Kim.

Remarks. Only three females of this large morphotype were collected, two of which were destroyed for DNA analysis. All were significantly longer and larger than the typical Itostenhelia polyhymnia , and the one examined morphologically measured 511 µm. Other differences include somewhat longer caudal rami (arrowed in Fig. 42A View FIGURE 42 ), proportionately larger genital double-somite (arrowed in Fig. 42A View FIGURE 42 ), and two sensilla on cephalothorax and one on first urosomite missing (all arrowed in Fig. 42A View FIGURE 42 ). However, all other morphological details are the same, including the labrum ( Fig. 42C View FIGURE 42 ) and fifth leg ( Fig. 42D View FIGURE 42 ), and the COI sequence is indistinguishable too (although it is very short). Thus we have to conclude that this is either dimorphism or a chance mutation. The latter hypothesis seems more likely, as the L-form is very rare compared to the typical form, and all three specimens collected were found in one sample, so there is a chance that they are kin. We have no doubt that these two forms are conspecific, but they are listed separately to better alert readers about their existence.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

SubPhylum

Crustacea

Class

Maxillopoda

Order

Harpacticoida

Family

Miraciidae

SubFamily

Stenheliinae

Genus

Itostenhelia

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF