Notoscopelus aff. caudispinosus (Johnson, 1863)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2017.322 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3848311 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/61599612-9472-CE22-79B9-A519FBFD91A5 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Notoscopelus aff. caudispinosus (Johnson, 1863) |
status |
|
Notoscopelus aff. caudispinosus (Johnson, 1863) View in CoL
A single, well-preserved otolith ( Fig. 7I View Fig ) is attributed, with some reserve, to the Recent Notoscopelus caudispinosus based on the shape of the dorsal rim that is the highest around the middle part of the otolith and on a posteriorly extended posterior part (see also Brzobohatý & Nolf 1996: pl. 7, figs 8–9). This specimen, however, shows a general outline, similar to those of fossil Notoscopelus mediterraneus (Koken, 1891) and Symbolophorus meridionalis Steurbaut, 1979 (see Brzobohatý & Nolf 1996: pl. 8, figs 1–15). Our specimen differs from those of N. mediterraneus by its more extended posterior rim, while otoliths of S. meridionalis show a flatter dorsal rim and a deeper incised excisura. A single specimen of Symbolophorus meridionalis , figured by Lin et al. (2015: fig. 3(7)), shows a much shorter outline, which suggests an attribution to the genus Myctophum Rafinesque, 1810 rather than to Symbolophorus Bolin & Wisner, 1959 , and, therefore, this attribution must be considered as doubtful.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |