Gesomyrmex
publication ID |
22678 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0919CF2B-DBC2-4504-B48A-8AD0D01695DB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6214382 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5EF4696F-5AD7-131C-1D0B-03C997211363 |
treatment provided by |
Christiana |
scientific name |
Gesomyrmex |
status |
|
Genus Gesomyrmex View in CoL HNS Mayr, 1868
Type species. Gesomyrmex hoernesi Mayr HNS , 1868, by monotypy.
Diagnosis. Worker caste polymorphic. Eyes enormously large in workers and males. Antennae geniculate, 8-segmented in worker, 10-segmented in gyne and 8-11-segmented in male. Mandible in worker and gyne with 5-10 acute teeth; mandibles in male reduced, not opposable. Posterolateral corners of the head and propodeum without spines. Fore wings with closed cells 1+2r, 3r and mcu.
Species numbers and distribution. Six extant species are known which are distributed in the Oriental tropics (Fig. 1). Three fossil species were described: Gesomyrmex hoernesi Mayr HNS , 1868 (Baltic amber, late Eocene), G. expectans Theobald HNS , 1937 (Kleinkembs, France, Oligocene) and G. miegi Theobald HNS , 1937 (Haut-Rhin, France, Oligocene). The last two fossil species must be excluded from Gesomyrmex HNS (vide infra). Five new species from middle Eocene deposits of Germany are described below.
Comments. Mayr (1868) described the genus Gesomyrmex HNS with the unique species G hoernesi HNS from Baltic amber from 19 workers and one male. A quarter of a century later Andre (1892) described two new extant species from Borneo. One of them was similar to fossil G. hoernesi HNS , and he described it as Gesomyrmex chaperi HNS . The second species differed by its large size, a more elongate head and smaller eyes, and he described it as Dimorphomyrmex janeti HNS . Emery (1905) found in Baltic amber a specimen similar to D. janeti HNS and described it as Dimorphomyrmex theryi HNS . Finally Wheeler (1915) re-described G. hoernesi HNS and D. theryi HNS and described two new species from Baltic amber: Gesomyrmex annectens HNS and Dimorphomyrmex mayri HNS .
Some years later Wheeler (1929) received 18 workers, collected by L.G.K. Kalshoven in Java. All these ants were collected from the same nest, so, naturally, they belonged to the same species described as Gesomyrmex kalshoveni Wheeler HNS . Workers from the same colony were very polymorphic. Large, medium and small workers differed by the form of the head, eye size, and mandible form. Moreover large (major) workers had characters of Dimorphomyrmex HNS , and small (minor) and medium workers those of Gesomyrmex HNS . As a result Wheeler designated Dimorphomyrmex HNS as junior synonym of Gesomyrmex HNS , and concluded that both species of Dimorphomyrmex HNS and both species of Gesomyrmex HNS , described from Baltic amber, really belong to one polymorphic species Gesomyrmex hoernesi Mayr HNS .
Most extant species of Gesomyrmex HNS are known only from the worker caste. A revision of the genus and key for determination of workers was published by Cole (1949). Only three sexuals are known: a winged gyne and a male of G luzonensis HNS (Wheeler 1916, 1930) and a wingless gyne of G. tobiasi HNS (Dubovikoff 2004). The last species is known only from this gyne.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |