Gigantactis Brauer, 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1982-0224-2020-0151 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10960657 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5D77BB3E-0F3E-FFF5-FCF7-FC38DEE8FA5D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Gigantactis Brauer, 1902 |
status |
|
Gigantactis Brauer, 1902 View in CoL View at ENA
Diagnosis. Metamorphosed females of Gigantactis are distinguished from those of Rhynchactis , the other genus of the family, by the absence of pelvic bones and by having 5–9 dorsal-fin rays (rarely 4–10) and 4–7 anal-fin rays (rarely 8) (vs. 3–4 dorsal-fin rays, rarely 5, and 3–4 anal-fin rays). They further differ from those of Rhynchactis by the following characters: frontal and parietal bones present (vs. absent), premaxilla well developed, with teeth present throughout their length (vs. premaxilla represented by a remnant bearing 0–2 teeth), maxilla reduced to threadlike remnants (vs. maxillae absent), dentary with several rows of strong recurved teeth (vs. dentary toothless or with only minute teeth), a single hypohyal (vs. two hypohyals), all caudal-fin rays unbranched (vs. 9 caudal-fins rays, 2 simple + 4 branched + 3 simple), skin spinulose (vs. skin covered with minute spinules in larger specimens, but juveniles naked), snout produced in front of mouth, illicium originating at its tip (vs. snout truncated, illicium origin slightly behind its tip), and esca consisting of an expanded luminous bulb (vs. absence of bulbous, terminal, escal light organs) (Bertelsen et al., 1981; Pietsch, 2009).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.