Karaops yumbu, Crews, Sarah C., 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3647.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DF4EB33A-5F2B-4B0E-9AEF-4F2B9B832438 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6159952 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5B7D6C09-FFA5-FF99-D7AF-28C083DE94E5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Karaops yumbu |
status |
sp. nov. |
Karaops yumbu View in CoL sp. nov.
( Figs 35–37 View FIGURES 31 – 36 View FIGURE 37 )
Type material. Holotype: male, c. 280 km S of Lake Argyle [18°54’36.1” S 128°55’24” E, Western Australia, Australia], 15 January 2012 – 16 March 2012, A. Slabber (Browns Range—Site 10–97), wet pitfall, sand plain (WAM T123210).
Paratype: 1 male, c. 280 km S of Lake Argyle [18°54’4.3” S 128°55’31.7” E, Western Australia, Australia], 15 January 2012 – 16 March 2012, A. Slabber (Browns Range—Site 10–97), wet pitfall, stony rise (WAM T123209).
Etymology. The specific epithet comes from the Jaru word for spider, yumbu , in the indigenous language of the type locality. This name is to be treated as a noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. Males of Karaops yumbu sp. nov. can be differentiated from all other species by having an MA that arises from the distal end of an unsclerotised, retromedially-oriented extension of the tegulum ( Figs 35–36 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ). Females are unknown.
Description. Male (holotype):
Colour. Dorsal shield of prosoma uniformly yellow-brown; sternum pale yellow; chelicerae pale yellow with darker infuscations anteriorly; maxillae brown, lightening distally; labium pale yellow-brown, lightening distally; opisthosoma grey-brown with darker marks; ventrally pale yellow; legs yellow-brown to brown, annulations present on all legs, those on femora with hollow centres, not entirely encircling femora.
Prosoma. 0.89 times longer than broad; clypeus 0.13 high.
Eyes. AER slightly recurved; PER recurved; PME larger than AME, PLE larges, ALE smallest, eye group width 1.00; eye diameters AME 0.18, ALE 0.09, PME 0.20, PLE 0.27; interdistances AME-ALE 0.25, PME-PLE 0.20, ALE-PLE 0.13, AME-PME 0.02; ocular quadrangle AME-AME 0.13; PME-PME 0.45.
Sternum. 0.90 times longer than broad.
Chelicerae. Promargin with 4 teeth, retromargin with 3 teeth.
Pedipalp ( Figs 35–36 View FIGURES 31 – 36 ). Fm spination 0-1-2; RTA with 2 apophyses, dorsal apophysis much longer than ventral apophysis, in lateral view sinuous, curved ventrally, then dorsally, then ventrally, pointed at tip, ventral apophysis rectangular, directed ventrally, RTA with excavation dorsally where it connects to pedipalpal tibia; cymbium round; conductor large, crescent-shaped, projecting ventrally at tip; embolus very long and slender, arising at 3 o’clock from behind tegular extension, extending beyond proximal margin of cymbium, then curving around the edge of cymbium, passing the 3 o’clock starting point and ending at 5 o’clock; MA very small, arising from the distal end of an unsclerotised, retromedially-oriented extension of the tegulum, sclerotised, at tip, slightly hooked distally, directed proximally.
Opisthosoma. Possible setal tufts, but setae are worn off.
Legs. Leg I slightly shorter than legs II and III; leg formula unknown (at least one leg missing); leg III longest; tarsal claws without teeth; spination leg I, Fm pr 1-1-0, d 1-1-1, rl 0; Ti d 0 R pr v 1-1 -1-1-1-1-1, R rl v 1-1 -1-1-1- 1, L 2-2-2-2-2-2; Mt v 2-2 -2-2; leg II, Fm pr 0, d 1-1-1, rl 0-0-1; Ti 2-2-2-2-2-2; Mt v 2-2 -2-2; leg III, Fm pr 0, d 1- 1-1, rl 0-1-1, Ti 2-0, Mt 0; leg IV missing.
Measurements. Total length 4.82. Dorsal shield of prosoma length 2.32, width 2.64. Sternum length 1.27, width 1.41. Opisthosoma length 2.50, width 2.29. Pedipalp: Fm 0.79, Pt 0.39, Ti 0.32, Ta 1.00, (total) 2.50. Leg I: Fm 2.64, Pt 1.31, Ti 2.50, Mt 2.14, Ta 1.16, (total) 9.57. Leg II: Fm 3.66, Pt 1.14, Ti 2.86, Mt 2.61,Ta 1.30, (total) 11.57. Leg III: Fm 4.00, Pt 1.07, Ti 3.21, Mt 2.86, Ta 1.32, (total) 12.46. Leg IV: missing.
Distribution. Known only from the type locality ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ).
Life history and habitat preferences. Sandy and rocky areas.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |