Diolcus thomasi Eger, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5354149 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3A5BFF23-A8A5-4F3C-9869-76F71F9C471D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4A47879E-FFF7-E46D-FEE8-FE31FB6EF854 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Diolcus thomasi Eger |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diolcus thomasi Eger , new species
Description. Body narrowly ovate, medium sized ( Fig. 1–2 View Figures 1–2 ). Dorsum stramineous with uniformly dense dark brown punctation, this sometimes with green or purple iridescence. Venter stramineous, punctures on head and propleura large, sometimes with green or purple iridescence; punctures becoming smaller and less iridescent posteriorly on meso- and metapleura; abdominal punctation small and relatively dense laterally, much less dense mesially.
Apex of head narrowly rounded, mandibular plates shorter than clypeus and relatively acute apically. Lateral margins of mandibular plates slightly sinuous, straight to shallowly concave basally, slightly convex anteriorly. Clypeus elevated above mandibular plates. Antennae stramineous, somewhat darker basally; relative length of segments: V>IV>II>III>I. Rostrum stramineous, darker toward apex, reaching onto third abdominal sternite; relative length of segments: II>III>I>IV.
Anterior margin of pronotum triconcave, shallowly concave behind eyes, broadly and shallowly concave mesially, anterolateral margins straight or slightly convex, posterolateral margins sinuous, posterior margin straight to slightly concave. Punctation relatively uniform, dark; iridescence, if present, usually confined to anterior 1/3 to 1/2 of pronotum. Scutellum and exposed portion of coria with punctation similar to that of pronotum, vague pale mesial line usually present on scutellum. Ostiole located slightly closer to metacoxae than to lateral margin of metapleuron; ostiolar peritreme short, just outlining ostiole. Legs stramineous, maculate, macules somewhat lighter in color than on thoracic venter, those on superior surface of tibiae larger and darker.
Coloration on venter of abdomen uniform and similar to that of thorax, except punctation generally smaller, stridulatory areas and meson of abdomen with relatively few punctures. Seventh sternite of males not excavated posteriorly, reaching end of body and covering pygophore ( Fig. 10 View Figures 7–10 ). Second and third sternites shallowly impressed mesially.
Posterior margin of pygophore broadly excavated mesially, forming a very open ‘v’, convex laterally ( Fig. 7–8 View Figures 7–10 ). Parameres located near lateral margin of genital cup, uncinate and curving laterad ( Fig. 7, 9 View Figures 7–10 , 19 View Figures 19–21 ). Proctiger weakly sclerotized. Phallotheca short, not strongly sclerotized ( Fig. 22–23 View Figures 22–27 ); phallus with three pairs of conjunctival processes; first pair elongate, mostly membranous, with short, sclerotized, acute hook at apex; second pair elongate, curved toward acute apex; third pair thin, elongate, sclerotized, acute apically. Aedeagal conducting tube thin, sclerotized.
Posterior margin of eighth valvifers produced posterad into rounded angle, slightly longer mesad of angle than laterad of angle ( Fig. 28 View Figures 28–30 ). Ninth valvifers strongly exposed. Ninth laterotergites not surpassing posterior margin of abdomen, contiguous mesially. Fecundation canal thin, elongate ( Fig. 32 View Figures 32–37 ). Spermathecal duct simple, spermathecal dilation present, oval shaped; intermediate part of spermatheca with proximal and distal flanges developed; apical receptacle digitoid, slightly constricted prior to apex ( Fig. 33 View Figures 32–37 ).
Male measurements (mm) (N = 10). Total length 8.69 (8.30–9.20); head: length 2.09 (1.90–2.20), width 2.93 (2.75–3.05); preocular length 1.15 (1.10–1.25); interocular width 1.81 (1.65–1.90); interocellar width 0.98 (0.90– 1.05); pronotum: length 2.64 (2.40–2.80), width 5.60 (5.30–5.90); scutellum: length 5.59 (5.10–5.90), width 4.59 (4.20–4.80); mesial length of sternites: III 0.53 (0.50–0.55), IV 0.54 (0.50–0.60), V 0.56 (0.50–0.60), VI 0.57 (0.50– 0.65), VII 1.88 (1.80–2.00).
Female measurements (mm) (N = 10). Total length 8.80 (8.40–9.05); head: length 2.10 (1.85–2.20), width 2.92 (2.75–3.10); preocular length 1.14 (1.10–1.20); interocular width 1.83 (1.65–2.05); interocellar width 0.98 (0.90–1.10); pronotum: length 2.58 (2.40–2.70), width 5.56 (5.15–5.85); scutellum: length 5.65 (5.50–5.90), width 4.72 (4.40–5.00); mesial length of sternites: III 0.50 (0.50–0.50), IV 0.54 (0.50–0.60), V 0.54 (0.50–0.70), VI 0.54 (0.50–0.80), VII 1.29 (1.20–1.40).
Type specimens. Holotype: male, labeled 1) CAYMAN ISLANDS: Cayman Brac , Brac Paradise Subdivision, 6-VI-2008, M. C. Thomas, R. H. Turnbow, & B. K. Dozier. 2) Black Light Trap, N19°44.688′ W79°44.359′ ( FSCA) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 65 males, 75 females. 60 males, 63 females labeled as holotype (2 males, 2 females to each of AMNH, DARC, DBTC, UGCA, USNM; 10 males, 10 females JEEC; 41 males, 43 females FSCA) ; 2 males labeled CAYMAN: Cayman Brac , N19°43.188′ W79°47.579′, 7 June 2008, Thomas & Turnbow ( FSCA) GoogleMaps ; 1 male, 7 females labeled CAYMAN: Cayman Brac , N19°43.688′ W79°44.359′, 5 June 2008, R. Turnbow ( FSCA) GoogleMaps ; 1 female labeled CAYMAN: Cayman Brac , N19°44.688′ W79°44.359′, bl trap, 5 June 2008, Thomas & Turnbow ( FSCA) GoogleMaps ; 1 male labeled CAYMAN: Cayman Brac , 9 km E Brac Parrot Res., 3-4-VII-2013, M. Thomas, Black Light Trap ( FSCA) ; 1 male, 3 females labeled CAYMAN: Little Cayman , 3 km S of Spot Bay, 8-VII-2013, M. Thomas, Black Light Trap ( FSCA) ; 1 female labeled CAYMAN: Little Cayman, 3.6 mi west of Coot Marsh , black light trap, 6.vii.2013, Col: M. C. Thomas ( FSCA) .
Distribution. Known only from the types which were collected on Cayman Brac and Little Cayman Island.
Etymology. The species is named for Mike Thomas who, with his colleagues, collected all of the types of this species and whose efforts in collecting insects, in systematic studies of beetles, and in contributions to the publication of this journal, contributed immensely to our entomological knowledge. He will be missed.
Comments. Diolcus thomasi resembles D. chrysorrhoeus in a number of characters. Both species are similar in size and shape and in the presence of iridescent punctures ( Fig. 1–4 View Figures 1–2 View Figures 3–4 ) although these are sometimes lacking in D. thomasi . Diolcus chrysorrhoeus is a little wider than D. thomasi , the coloration of D. chrysorrhoeus is darker and the latter almost always has two dark sublateral macules on the scutellum ( Fig. 3 View Figures 3–4 ). The lack of an emargination on the posterior margin of the seventh sternite, hiding the male genitalia in both species ( Fig. 10 View Figures 7–10 , 14 View Figures 11–14 ), is distinctive and not found in other described species of Diolcus . The parameres and male pygophore of D. chrysorrhoeus ( Fig. 11–13 View Figures 11–14 , 20 View Figures 19–21 ) are similar to those of D. thomasi . The phallus in D. chrysorrhoeus ( Fig. 24–25 View Figures 22–27 ) is similar to that of D. thomasi in shape, in the presence of three pairs of conjunctival appendages and in the aedeagal conducting tube thin, elongate, and sclerotized. The differences lie particularly in the conjunctival processes. The sclerotized apex of each first conjunctival process is narrowed more abruptly in D. chrysorrhoeus , that of D. thomasi gradually narrowing to an acute apex. In D. chrysorrhoeus , each second conjunctival process is broader apically, narrowing to an acute apex in D. thomasi . The orientation of the third conjunctival processes in D. thomasi is toward the apex of the phallus while in D. chrysorrhoeus , they are oriented toward the base (this may be an artifact of expansion of the phallus). In addition, those of D. thomasi are narrow and elongate with an acute apex, while those of D. chrysorrhoeus are broader, shorter and less acute at the apex.
Nothing is known of the biology of this species except that most of the specimens were collected in black light traps.
Subfamily placement of Nesogenes . The subfamily Elvisurinae Stål currently contains six genera, five of these are found only in the Eastern Hemisphere: Austrotichus Gross and Solenotichus Martin from Australia; Coleotichus White from Australia and the Pacific Islands, Elvisura Spinola from Africa and India, and Solenosthedium Spinola from Asia, Africa and Europe. The single elvisurine genus in the Western Hemisphere is Nesogenes Horváth , with a single species, N. boscii (Fabricius) from the Caribbean area. As indicated in the introduction, the placement of this genus in the Elvisurinae is questionable.
Nesogenes boscii resembles elvisurine taxa in having the thoracic sterna deeply sulcate and bordered by strongly elevated carinae ( Fig. 6 View Figures 5–6 ). This character is generally used to characterize the Elvisurinae ( Cassis and Vanags 2006; Tsai et al. 2011). It resembles some of the Elvisurinae , particularly some species of Coleotichus in having a convex posterior margin of the pronotum and in the presence of iridescent punctures ( Fig. 5 View Figures 5–6 ) but the latter are also found in species of Diolcus .
Nesogenes boscii differs from other Elvisurinae and resembles Pachycorinae , particularly some species of Diolcus in a number of characters. The abdominal sternites of Pachycorinae possess sublateral striated stridulatory patches on at least abdominal sternites 5 and 6 which are present in N. boscii . These are lacking in the Elvisurinae although the latter do possess setose glandular patches in the same area. The proepisternal keel is usually strongly developed in Elvisurinae , but not in N. boscii . Czaja (2016) indicated that the distal flange of the spermatheca is well developed in Elvisurinae , but is reduced or absent in the Pachycorinae ; it is reduced in N. boscii ( Fig. 36–37 View Figures 32–37 ).
In summary, the placement of N. boscii in the Elvisurinae was based primarily on a single character. The geographic distribution of this species and the preponderance of characters suggest that it belongs in the Pachycorinae . I therefore remove N. boscii from the Elvisurinae and place it in the Pachycorinae .
The generic placement of N. boscii also warrants some scrutiny. It resembles D. chrysorrhoeus and D. thomasi in having a greatly reduced ostiolar peritreme; seventh urosternite not concave posteriorly, reaching the posterior margin of the abdomen and concealing the genital cup ( Fig. 18 View Figures 15–18 ); and in the presence of iridescent punctures, at least on the head and pronotum although N. boscii sometimes has yellow calloused areas on the dorsum. The tergites, lt9 = ninth laterotergites, s7 = seventh sternite, vf8 =
eighth valvifers). Scale lines = 1.0 mm.
male pygophore ( Fig. 15–17 View Figures 15–18 ) and parameres ( Fig. 21 View Figures 19–21 ) of N. boscii are similar to those of D. chrysorrhoeus and D. thomasi . The phallus of N. boscii ( Fig. 26–27 View Figures 22–27 ) is similar to that of the above Diolcus species in general structure although the aedeagal conducting tube is only sclerotized basally and the third conjunctival appendages are lacking. The female genital plates of N. boscii ( Fig. 30 View Figures 28–30 ) and internal female genitalia ( Fig. 35–36 View Figures 32–37 ) are similar to Diolcus spp. except that the distal flange of the spermatheca is more reduced in N. boscii than in the two Diolcus species and the apical receptacle of the spermatheca is much more elongate in N. boscii . Nesogenes boscii appears to be very closely related to the two species of Diolcus treated in this paper, but there are enough differences in the male and female genitalia to retain its placement in a separate genus pending revision of Diolcus .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |