Alysia stenopos, Zhu & Achterberg & Chen, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4500.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:54BE1878-D334-4668-BDAA-45EC75EB841A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300153 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4620AD1A-FFBD-FFF4-49A9-FBDF6F9F9E49 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Alysia stenopos |
status |
sp. nov. |
Alysia stenopos sp. n.
Figs 11–12
Type material. Holotype, ♀ ( ZJUH), “ [NE. China:] Jilin, Mt. Changbai , 6.?.1999, lin Naiquan No. 20035568” . Paratype: 1♀ ( ZJUH), same data as holotype, but No. 20035567 .
Diagnosis. Body black ( Fig. 11); mandible and legs dark brown; third antennomere (including annellus) 1.4 × longer than fourth antennomere ( Fig. 12M View FIGURE 12 ); eye in dorsal view 1.1 × as long as temple ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ); eye in lateral view 1.4 × higher than wide ( Fig. 12J View FIGURE 12 ); frons smooth posteriorly, but rugose between antennal sockets ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ); vertex and temple smooth but with few long setae ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ); face sculptured medially and transversely rugose near eye, 2.5 × wider than high, rather convex medially, with a short medio-longitudinal ridge and long setae around eye ( Fig. 12I View FIGURE 12 ); clypeus small, semi-ellipital, with some punctures and long setae ( Fig. 12I View FIGURE 12 ); precoxal sulcus crenulate, only present medially ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); notauli incomplete, only present anteriorly and sculptured ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ); medio-posterior depression deep and long, almost extending to middle of mesoscutum, mesoscutum with long setae along trace of notauli ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ); surface of propodeum densely reticulate-rugose, areola absent posteriorly ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ); pterostigma 3.8 × longer than its maximum width ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ); hind coxa smooth ( Fig. 12N View FIGURE 12 ); length of first tergite almost equal to its apical width, its surface finely longitudinally striate; convexity of upper valve of ovipositor low basally ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.4 × as long as fore wing (total visible sheath 0.4 times), and 1.2 × as long as hind tibia ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ).
Description. Holotype, ♀, length of body 3.6 mm, of fore wing 4.0 mm.
Head. Transverse, width of head 1.9 × its lateral length, and 1.5 × wider than mesoscutum ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ); antenna incomplete, with 24 antennomere remaining, third antennomere (including annellus) 1.4 × longer than fourth antennomere, length of third and fourth antennomere 3.2 and 1.8 × their width, respectively ( Fig. 12M View FIGURE 12 ); length of maxillary palp 1.3 × height of head ( Fig. 12J View FIGURE 12 ); eye in dorsal view 1.1 × as long as temple ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ); eye in lateral view 1.4 × higher than wide ( Fig. 12J View FIGURE 12 ); frons smooth posteriorly, but rugose between antennal sockets ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ); vertex and temple smooth and with few long setae ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ); OOL:diameter of ocellus:POL= 13:5:3; face sculptured medially and with transverse rugae around the eye, 2.5 × wider than high, rather convex medially, with a short medio-longitudinal ridge and long setae near eye ( Fig. 12I View FIGURE 12 ); clypeus small, semi-elliptical, with some punctures and long setae ( Fig. 12I View FIGURE 12 ); mandible enlarged apically, dorsal tooth enlarged, lobe-shaped ( Fig. 12K View FIGURE 12 ), ventral tooth medium-sized and lobe-shaped ( Fig. 12L View FIGURE 12 ), middle tooth curved and acute, with small incision between first and second tooth ( Fig. 12K View FIGURE 12 ), medial length of mandible 1.5 × its maximum width.
Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.3 × its height ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); pronope absent; medio-anteriorly pronotum crenulate, remainder of pronotum smooth ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); epicnemial area widely crenulated; precoxal sulcus crenulate and only present medially ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); pleural sulcus narrowly crenulated; episternal scrobe linear and deep ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); metapleuron rugose ventrally, remainder smooth ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); notauli incomplete, only present anteriorly and sculptured ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ); medio-posterior depression deep and long, almost extending to middle of mesoscutum, mesoscutum with long setae along trace of notauli; scutellar sulcus deep, with one longitudinal carina medially, sulcus 4.0 × wider than its maximum length ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ); scutellum smooth; surface of propodeum densely reticulate-rugose, areola absent posteriorly ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ).
Wings ( Figs 12A–B View FIGURE 12 ). Pterostigma wide, 3.8 × longer than its maximum width. r:3-SR:SR1 = 1:3:10; 1-SR+M nearly straight; SR1 straight; r 0.5 × as long as width of pterostigma; cu-a postfurcal; 1-CU1:2-CU1 = 3:19; 3-CU1 as long as CU1b; 2-SR:3-SR:r-m = 2:2:1; m-cu postfurcal, converging to 1-M posteriorly; first subdiscal cell 2.5 × as long as wide; M+CU1 sclerotized. Hind wing: M+CU: 1-M: 1r-m = 20:15:11; m-cu weakly postfurcal.
Legs. Hind coxa smooth, without ventro-basal tubercle, with dense long setae; tarsal claws slender, longer than arolium ( Fig. 12N View FIGURE 12 ); length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 4.0, 6.3 and 3.8 × their width, respectively; apical appendages of hind tarsal segments absent, segments ventrally with dense bristles ( Fig. 12N View FIGURE 12 ).
Metasoma. Length of first tergite almost equal to its apical width, its surface finely longitudinally striate ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ); dorsope distinct; convexity of upper valve of ovipositor low basally ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ); setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.4 × as long as fore wing (total visible sheath 0.4 times), and 1.2 × as long as hind tibia ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ).
Colour. Black ( Fig. 11); mandible and legs dark brown; pterostigma and veins brown; wing membrane hyaline.
Variation. Females have body length 3.6–4.0 mm, and length of fore wing 4.0– 4.4 mm.
Comparative diagnosis. This species is similar to A. avatsha Belokobylskij but differs by having the hind tarsal claws lacking a small lobe (versus claws with a small lobe in A. avatsha ); comparatively wide face, 2.5 × wider than high (versus 1.8–2.0), and mandible with small incision between first and second tooth (versus without incision).
Etymology. Named “ stenopos ” because of the low face: “ steno ” is Greek for “narrow” and “ opos ” is Greek for “face”.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |