Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834

Eya, Bryan K., 2021, Recharacterization of Stenaspis Audinet-Serville, 1834 with a new species from Mexico (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae: Trachyderini), Insecta Mundi 2021 (851), pp. 1-36 : 21-26

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5041512

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:37900822-FF60-4386-BF30-9434678DD39B

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/445E87AE-2B43-FF9A-FF06-88D7E099FE8E

treatment provided by

Carolina (2021-06-29 14:39:03, last updated by Plazi 2023-11-03 02:24:46)

scientific name

Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834
status

 

Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834 View in CoL

( Fig. 103–136 View Figures 103–120 View Figures 121–136 )

Stenaspis verticalis Audinet-Serville 1834: 52 View in CoL ; Dupont 1838: 51; Castelnau 1840: 419; Guérin-Méneville 1844: 218 (syn.); White 1853: 78 (syn.); Strauch 1861: 127 (cat.); Thomson 1864: 208; Lacordaire 1869: 171; Chenu 1870, 311; Gemminger and Harold 1872: 2967 (cat.); Bates 1880: 76 (dist.), 1885: 321 (dist.); Leng 1886: 62; Townsend 1895: 47 (dist.); Fall and Cockerell 1907: 192 (dist.); Casey 1912: 319; Aurivillius 1912: 458 (cat.); Perkins and Swezey 1924: 51 (host.); Smyth 1934: 117 (biol.); Blackwelder 1946: 589 (cat.); Gibson and Carrillo 1959: 120 (dist.); Linsley 1962: 98; Chemsak et al. 1980: 33 (dist.); Terrón 1992: 288 (dist.); Chemsak et al. 1992: 86 (cat.); Chemsak and Noguera 1993: 64 (dist.); Napp 1994: 279; Monné 1994: 35 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 152 (cat.); Noguera and Chemsak 1996: 403 (dist.); Noguera et al. 2002: 624 (dist.); Turnbow et al. 2003: 18 (dist.); Hovore 2006: 374 (dist.); Noguera et al. 2007: 312 (dist.); Maes et al. 2010: 618 (dist.); Garcia Morales et al. 2014: 106 (dist.); Noguera and Gutiérrez 2016: 659 (dist.).

Trachyderes superbus Newman 1838: 493 View in CoL .

Redescription. Male: Length 17–33 mm. Form large, robust; integument reddish-brown to black; head, pronotum, and appendages at least partly red or bright reddish-orange, elytra metallic blue, green or purple, scutellum

103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120

all black or basal half brownish and apically black. Head with vertex and frons rugulose, irregularly punctate, glabrate; mandibles with apices acute; genae irregularly punctate; sparsely covered with appressed pubescence; antennal tubercles prominent, apices acute; eyes moderately large, finely faceted, upper lobes small, well separated; antennae elongate, 11-segmented, exceeding elytral apices by about four segments, scape conical, coarsely separately to irregularly punctate with very short, depressed hair arising from each puncture; apices of antennomere III–VII slightly enlarged and expanded; antennomeres from apex of III laterally carinate with poriferous area on either side of carina, dorsum of antennomeres III–VI glabrate, nitid, finely, sparsely, irregularly punctate, apices densely punctate and densely clothed with short, black depressed hairs, antennomeres from VII densely clothed with short appressed pubescence; antennomere III longer than I, IV shorter than III, V longer than IV, VI subequal to V, VII subequal to VI, VIII subequal to or shorter than VII, IX shorter than VIII, X shorter than IX, XI longest, appendiculate at apical two-fifth. Pronotum 1.5–1.6 times as broad as long, rounded to broadly angulate at sides; anterior angles inflated, broadly rounded; disc with dorsal calli vague, two in anterior half on either side of middle, and three in basal half, one in middle and one each on either side; area between calli flattened, surface coarsely, irregularly punctate, sparsely covered with whitish, transparent hairs; proepisternum inflated, finely, very densely punctate, sparsely pubescent, and demarcated from prosternum and coarsely punctate pronotal disc; prosternum transversely rugose with finely densely punctate transverse subrectangular impressed area on each side of middle; prosternal intercoxal process nitid, irregularly punctate; mesosternum with surface nitid, anterior half and on sides finely, densely, minutely punctate and densely pubescent with appressed, transparent hairs, posterior half sparsely, irregularly punctate in middle; mesosternal intercoxal process sparsely pubescent on sides; metasternum nitid, sparsely punctate, and sparsely pubescent with long, depressed, whitish hairs, sides occasionally densely pubescent; metepisternum densely, minutely punctate, densely pubescent with whitish, depressed hairs. Elytra about 2.2–2.4 times longer than broad, distinctly margined laterally; disc finely to coarsely punctate. Legs with femora slightly clavate, finely, sparsely to coarsely punctate, surface sparsely clothed with short, depressed hairs, outer margin with short, depressed bristles; tibiae slender, surface glabrate, sparsely to coarsely, densely punctate and sparsely covered with short, depressed hairs, inner margin with a row of short, depressed bristles in apical half. Abdomen glabrate, finely, shallowly and rather sparsely punctate in middle, sparsely pubescent with suberect hairs, sides more finely, densely punctate, densely pubescent with appressed, short hairs; fifth sternite truncate to broadly, shallowly emarginate at apex.

Female: 19–37 mm. Form similar to male, head, pronotum and appendages similar in coloration to male; antennae reaching apical fifth of elytra to attaining apices, scape conical, coarsely, separately punctate to finely, separately punctate; apices of antennomeres III–VI slightly enlarged, VII–XI gradually flattened, apices expanded and angulate; antennomere III longer than I, IV shorter than III, V shorter than III, VI subequal to V, antennomeres from VII–X progressively shorter, XI longer than X and subequal to IX, appendiculate at apical quarter. Pronotum laterally tuberculate in middle; anterior angles with obtuse callus on each side; disc finely, sparsely, irregularly punctate to coarsely, contiguously punctate, sparsely covered with transparent, erect hairs; proepisternum coarsely, irregularly punctate and not clearly demarcated from prosternum and pronotal disc as in male; prosternum transversely rugose and coarsely striate-punctate (without finely punctate transverse subrectangular area found in males). Abdomen similar to male, fifth sternite rounded to truncate, shallowly emarginate or vaguely indented at apex.

Materials examined. USA: Texas: Val Verde Co.: near Langtry, 13 Oct. 1994, on Baccharis Linnaeus (Asteraceae) , D.W. Sundberg (1 male, DJHC). MEXICO: Nuevo Leon: 28 km W. Linares Viejo y La Palma, HWY58, 22 Oct. 2004, B.K. EYA (4 females, BKEC). Nayarit: Volcan Ceboruco, 5–15 km W. Jala, 15 Oct. 2001, R.L. Penrose (1 female, LGBC). Jalisco: Est. Biol. Chamela, 1/ 8 July 1988, J.A. Chemsak (1 male, 1 female, BKEC), 23 Oct. 1995, B.K. EYA (1 female, BKEC); Planta La Meza, 13.8 km N.E. San Gabriel, Hwy 432, 18 Oct., B.K. Eya (1 female, BKEC); Ajijic, 1585 m. 11 Sept. 2012, G. Nogueira (1 male, DJHC), 10/ 15 Oct. 1989, D. Curoe (1 male, DJHC); Volcan de Tequila, 1380 m., 25/ 30 Sept. 2012, R. Cunningham, L. Bezark (1 male, 1 female, LGBC). Michoacan: 8.3 km El Puerto (Jct. to Cotija), 19°49′N, 102°37′W, 1800 m., 18 Oct. 1988, A.D. Mudge (1 female, DJHC). Puebla: 22 km N.W. Jct. 190/ 125, 9 km N.W. Oaxaca border, 14 Oct. 2005, B.K. Eya (1 male, BKEC). Guerrero: 23 km W. Iguala, 11/ 16 Sept. 1982, elev. 1040 m., J.A. Chemsak, J.A. Powell (1 female, BKEC). Oaxaca: 1 mi S.E. Tutla, 6500′, 7 Oct. 1977, J. Powell, J. Chemsak, T. Eichlin, and T. Friedlander (1 male, BKEC); 10 km NNE Huajuapan de Leon, 28 Oct. 1990, A.D. Mudge (3 males, 4 females, DJHC, LGBC), 1 Nov. 1990, A. Mudge (3 males,

LGBC), 1 Nov. 1990, A.D. Mudge (1 male, DJHC) ; 12 km NNE Huajuapan de Leon, 1 Nov. 1990, A.D. Mudge (2 males, LGBC) ; 7 km S. Huajuapan de Leon, 1700 m., 28 Oct. 1990, R.L. Westcott (1 female, LGBC) .

Discussion. According to Linsley (1962: 98), this species exhibits considerable geographical variation in color and sculpturing as described by Bates (1885: 321). Stenaspis verticalis males also show considerable allometric variation in the length of antennomeres depending on the size of specimen, where larger individuals (31–33 mm) have antennomere IV longer than III and antennomeres V–X progressively longer, whereas in smaller specimens (17–21 mm) the length of antennomere IV is shorter than III, V longer than IV, VI subequal to or longer than V, and VII–X progressively shorter or subequal to the previous antennomeres. Antennomere XI in males of S. verticalis is the longest and is distinctly appendiculate as though there is a twelfth antennomere but the integument around the appendicular area is definitely fused. In large males (≥ 30 mm) the finely, densely, punctate transverse subrectangular impressed areas on each side of the prosternum are fused in the middle to form one continuous transverse subrectangular impressed area ( Fig. 17 View Figures 15–23 ), whereas in males smaller than 30 mm the transverse subrectangular areas are well separated ( Fig. 20 View Figures 15–23 , 29 View Figures 24–32 ). According to Casey (1912), the holotype of Stenaspis verticalis verticalis Audinet-Serville, 1834 is from Iguala in Guerrero, Mexico although the specific location is not noted by Audinet-Serville (1834) and Dupont (1834) other than just Mexico as the type locality. There are two subspecies named from the USA: Stenaspis verticalis insignis Casey, 1924 , and Stenaspis verticalis arizonicus Casey, 1912 .

Stenaspis verticalis arizonicus Casey, 1912 View in CoL (Type locality: Arizona, USA). Stenaspis verticalis: LeConte 1858: 40 View in CoL (cat.). Stenaspis arizonicus Casey 1912: 318 View in CoL . Stenaspis verticalis arizonicus Linsley 1962: 99 View in CoL ; Chemsak et al. 1992: 86 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 152 (cat.); Monné 1994: 35 (cat.); Lingafelter et al. 2014: 20 (holotype); Heffern et al. 2018: 746 (biol.).

Materials examined. USA: Arizona: Pima Co. : Baboquivari Mountains, Brown Canyon , 10/ 11 July 2001, 31°46′ 23″N, 111°33′31″W, W. K. Will (1 male, 1 female, LGBC) GoogleMaps ; Kitt Peak, 6 Aug. 1994, B.K. Eya (1 female, BKEC), Kitt Peak Obs. Rd. on roadside flower, 18 Sept. 1979, C.Y. Kitayama (1 male, LGBC) ; Lower Madera Canyon near old Missile Base , 10 Aug. 1990, R. Duff (1 female, LGBC) ; Kitt Peak Rd. , 1 Sept 1979, L. Bezark, G. Nishida, C. Kitayama, B. Tilden (1 male, LGBC) ; Madera Canyon, 13 Aug. 1988, D. Ahart (1 male, LGBC). Santa Cruz Co.: Pena Blanca Lake , 26 Aug. 1975, L. Bezark, G. Nishida, C. Kitayama, B. Tilden (1 female, LGBC) .

Discussion. According to Linsley (1962: 99), S. v. arizonicus has the elytra finely and densely punctate, usually green or greenish-blue. The pronotum is black and margined posteriorly with red. The ventral surface is reddishbrown or piceous, rarely with any red on metasternum. According to Casey (1912: 319), the very dense sculpture of the elytra is a striking character that differentiates S. v. arizonicus from S. v. verticalis Audinet-Serville. Examination of specimens from Arizona, which is the northwesternmost range of this species, S. v. arizonicus differs from the other subspecies by the darker, duller integument ( Fig. 103–106 View Figures 103–120 , 146 View Figures 146–154 ) and finely, confluently, vermiculate-punctate elytra ( Fig. 137 View Figures 137–145 ). Moving eastward into Texas the punctures on the elytra and scape become coarser, and the integument of the pronotum is more polished, as in the example from Val Verde County, Texas ( Fig. 107–108 View Figures 103–120 , 138 View Figures 137–145 , 147 View Figures 146–154 ).

Stenaspis verticalis insignis Casey, 1924 View in CoL (Type locality: Texas, Comal Co., USA). Stenaspis insignis: Casey 1924: 262 View in CoL ; Vogt 1949: 177 (dist.). Stenaspis verticalis insignis: Linsley 1962: 99 View in CoL ; Hovore et al. 1987: 297 (dist.); Chemsak et al. 1992: 86 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 152 (cat.); Monné 1994: 35 (cat.); Lingafelter et al. 2014: 80 (holotype).

Materials examined. USA: Texas: Bexar Co.: Petrenko Rd. 5 Oct. 1994, D.W. Sundberg (1 male, DJHC) ; Camp Bullis, NW. San Antonio , 25 Sept. 1960, E.L. Smith (1 female, LGBC). Medina Co. : 8 mi. W. Median, 15 Sept. 2013, bait, D.W. Sundberg (1 female, DJHC), 4 Oct. 2013, bait, D.W. Sundberg (1 male, DJHC). Comal Co. New Braunfels, 2 Oct. 1984, D. Sundberg (1 female, DJHC) .

Also tentatively assigned to this subspecies are nine additional specimens from Texas as follows: Jim Wells Co.: Premont, 13 Oct. 1984, D.J. Heffern (1 female, DJHC). San Patricio Co.: 4–5 mi. N. Sinton, 12 Oct. 1985, D.J. Heffern (1 female, DJHC); Sinton Area, 9 Nov. 1985, D.J. Heffern (1 male, DJHC). Cameron Co.: Sabal Palm Grove, 25/ 27 Oct. 1986, Heffern and Brattain (1 male, 1 female, DJHC), Hwy 4, Palmito Hill, 21 Oct. 1989, D.J. Heffern (1 female, DJHC); 16 km W. Boca Chica, 24 Oct. 1990, collected from Baccharis Linnaeus (Asteraceae) ,

L.G. Bezark (1 male, 2 females, LGBC).

121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136

Discussion. Examination of specimens of S. v. insignis from the vicinity of San Antonio, Texas (Bexar, Comal, and Medina Counties ), which is the northeasternmost range of this species, shows that this subspecies differs from S. v. verticalis , and S. v. arizonicus by the following characteristics: (1) striking bright reddish coloration of the integument ( Fig. 109–112 View Figures 103–120 ); (2) pronotum that is polished wholly or predominately bright reddish, coarsely, deeply, irregularly punctate, and frequently with two black spots in the anterior half ( Fig. 148 View Figures 146–154 ); (3) prosternum, meso- and metasternum that are mostly or partly reddish; (4) scape and elytra that are coarsely, contiguously punctate ( Fig. 139 View Figures 137–145 , 148 View Figures 146–154 ); and elytra that are usually metallic bluish. The antennae of both sexes of S. v. insignis are shorter than in the other subspecies, and usually about four-fifths the length of the body in females. According to Casey (1924: 263), other than from the overall color of integument, S. v. verticalis differs from S. v. insignis by the sculpture of the elytra where the punctures are well separated. Moving southward from Comal to San Patricio and Cameron Counties in Texas, and further into Nuevo Leon, Mexico, the antennae of both sexes are longer, and in females almost attaining the apex of the elytra or slightly exceeding elytra ( Fig. 115–116 View Figures 103–120 ). Also, there is a darkening of the integument of sternum, proepisternum and pronotal disc (i.e., area which is encompassing the two calli in the anterior half, the middle callus in posterior half, and the anterior margin), and the base of the scape especially in males ( Fig. 113–120 View Figures 103–120 ). A gradual geographical change in metallic coloration of the elytra from blue to greenish is also noticeable.

In general, further south into Mexico (i.e., Nayarit, Jalisco, Michoacán, Guerrero and Puebla) the punctures on the pronotal disc and scape become shallower, finer and sparser ( Fig. 149–153 View Figures 146–154 ), and the basal half of the elytral discs are more separately punctate ( Fig. 140–144 View Figures 137–145 ). There is an exceptional male specimen from Chamela, Jalisco ( Fig. 123–124 View Figures 121–136 , 150 View Figures 146–154 ) with dull reddish integument which resembles S. v. insignis , however, the pronotal disc is coarsely, shallowly and contiguously punctate ( Fig. 150 View Figures 146–154 ) and the elytral disc is finely, separately punctate ( Fig. 141 View Figures 137–145 ). Stenaspis v. insignis has a polished pronotal disc that is coarsely, deeply and irregularly punctate, and the elytra more coarsely, contiguously punctate ( Fig. 139 View Figures 137–145 ). Moving further southeastward from Jalisco into Michoacán, Guerrero and Puebla the elytra of S. v. verticalis become coarser but separately punctate ( Fig. 142–144 View Figures 137–145 ), and further into Oaxaca the elytra become coarsely, deeply and contiguously punctate ( Fig. 145 View Figures 137–145 ), more consistently aeneous green in coloration, and the basal half of the scape is more consistently reddish in all specimens examined ( Fig. 154 View Figures 146–154 ).

Stenaspis validicornis Casey, 1912 View in CoL (Type locality: Guerrero, Mexico). Stenaspis validicornis Casey 1912: 319 View in CoL ; Blackwelder 1946: 589 (cat.); Chemsak et al. 1992: 86 (cat.); Monné and Giesbert 1994: 152 (cat.); Monné 1994: 35 (cat.); Noguera and Chemsak 1996: 403 (dist.); Lingafelter et al. 2014: 339, 369 (lect.).

According to Casey (1912: 319), S. validicornis View in CoL is one of the various forms of the verticalis View in CoL group, where the males are defined by differences in color of the integument and punctures on the elytral disc and prosternum. The various forms of the verticalis View in CoL group examined by Casey are based on male characteristics only. Casey (1924: 263), wrote: “ validicornis View in CoL may be regarded as a subspecies or variety of verticalis Serv. View in CoL ” According to Mayr (1969: 41), “subspecies are normally allopatric,” and when several subspecies are reported from the same locality, it strongly indicates an incorrect usage of the term subspecies. Since the type localities of S. v. verticalis View in CoL and S. v. validicornis View in CoL are both from Guerrero, according to Casey (1912: 319) in close proximity to each other, S. v. validicornis View in CoL is considered to be consubspecific with S. v. verticalis View in CoL . This conclusion is based on the polymorphic nature of S. verticalis View in CoL as a species, which exhibits a notable geographic variation in color and sculpturing and the extensive range in distribution from the southwestern United States to southeastern Mexico. Stenaspis v. validicornis View in CoL is in the middle of the geographic range of this species and based on the description provided by Casey (1912) S. v. validicornis View in CoL does not exhibit enough variation in its form and sculpturing to be considered a separate subspecies. A photograph of S. validicornis View in CoL holotype ( Bezark 2020, id: 26567) does not show any notable difference in the overall appearance compared to S. verticalis View in CoL (e.g., S. verticalis View in CoL , syntype, Bezark 2020, id: 18558).

Audinet-Serville J-G. 1834. Nouvelle classification de la famille des longicornes (Suite). Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France (3) 1: 5 - 110.

Aurivillius C. 1912. Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae. p. 457 - 458. In: Junk W, Schenkling S. (eds.). Coleopterorum Catalogus pars 39 [Vol. 22]. W. Junk; Berlin. 574 p.

Bates HW, 1880. Longicornia. p. 1 - 224, pls. I - XV. In: Bates HW, Sharp D. Biologia Centrali-Americana. Insecta, Coleoptera, Vol. 5. Porter RH.; London. xii + 526 p. + 26 pl.

Bates HW. 1885. Supplement to Longicornia. p. 225 - 436 pls. XVI - XXV. In: Bates HW, Sharp D. Biologia Centrali-Americana, Insecta, Coleoptera, Vol. 5. Porter RH. London; xii + 526 p. + 26 pl.

Bezark LG. 2020. A photographic catalog of the Cerambycidae of the New World. Available at http: // bezbycids. com / byciddb / wdefault. asp? w = n (Last accessed October 2020.)

Blackwelder RE. 1946. Checklist of the coleopterous insects of Mexico, Central America, the West Indies and South America. Part 4. Bulletin of the United States National Museum; Washington D. C. 185 (4): 551 - 763.

Casey TL. 1912. Studies in the Longicornia of North America. Memoirs on the Coleoptera 3: 215 - 376.

Casey TL. 1924. Additions to the known Coleoptera of North America. Memoirs on the Coleoptera 11: 1 - 347.

Castelnau L (Le Comte de). 1840. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes Coleopteres. Dumenil P. Paris. 2: 1 - 563, 36 pl.

Chemsak JA, Linsley EG, Mankins JV. 1980. Records of some Cerambycidae from Honduras (Coleoptera). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 56 (1): 26 - 37.

Chemsak JA, Linsley EG, Noguera FA. 1992. II. Los Cerambycidae y Disteniidae de Norteamerica, Centroamerica y las Indias Occidentales (Coleoptera). Instituto de Biologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. Listados Faunisticos de Mexico 1992: 1 - 204.

Chemsak JA, Noguera FA. 1993. Annotated checklist of the Cerambycidae of the estacion de Biologia Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico (Coleoptera), with descriptions of new genera and species. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 89: 55 - 102, 3 fig.

Chenu JC. 1870. Coleopteres buprestiens, scarabeiens, pimeliens, curculioniens, scolytiens, chrysomeliens, etc. p. 1 - 360. In: Buffon, Daubenton, Lacepede, Cuvier G, Cuvier F, Saint-Hilaire G, Latreille, de Jussieu, Brongniart, etc., etc. (eds.). Encyclopedie d'histoire naturelle ou traite complet de cette science d'apres les travaux des naturalistes les plus eminents de tous les pays et de toutes les epoques. Vol. 7. Librairie de Firmin-Diodot et Cie; Paris 1884: vi + 360 p., 296 fig., 48 pl.

Dupont H. 1838. Monographie des trachyderides de la famille des longicornes. Magasin de Zoologie 8: i - xiii + 1 - 28, pl. 186 - 200 and p. 29 - 59, pl. 204 - 224.

Fall HC, Cockerell TDA. 1907. The Coleoptera of New Mexico. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 33: 145 - 272.

Garcia Morales LJ, Garcia Jimenez J, Toledo-Hernandez VH, Cantu-Ayala CM. 2014. Lista anotada preliminar de los Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) de Tamaulipas, Mexico. Biodiversidad Tamaulipeca 2 (2): 97 - 120 + 32 fig.

Gemminger M, von Harold E. 1872. Catalogus coleopterorum hucusque descriptorum synonymicus et systematicus. Sumptu E. H. Gummi (G. Beck) Monachii; Paris. Tom. 9: 2669 - 2988.

Gibson WW, Carrillo JL. 1959. Lista de insectos en la coleccion entomologica de la Oficina de Estudios Especiales, S. A. G. Folla Miscellanea 9: 1 - 254. [Oficina de Estudios Especiales del Secretario de Agricultura y Ganaderia; Mexico].

Guerin-Meneville FE. 1844. Iconographie du regne animal de G. Cuvier, ou representation d'apres nature de l'une des especes les plus remarquables et souvent non encore figurees, de chaque genre d'animaux. Avec un texte descriptif mis au courant de la Science. Insectes. Baillere JB. Paris and London. 7: i - iv + 5 - 576, 110 pl.

Heffern DJ, Vlasak J, Alten RL. 2018. Larval Host Plant Records, Distributional Records, and Biological Information on North American Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). The Coleopterists' Bulletin 72 (4): 739 - 750, 4 fig.

Hovore FT, Penrose RL, Neck RW. 1987. The Cerambycidae, or longhorned beetles, of southern Texas: a faunal survey (Coleoptera). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 44 (13): 283 - 334, 20 fig.

Hovore FT. 2006. The Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Guatemala. p. 363 - 378. In: Cano E. (ed.). Biodiversidad de Guatemala. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala; Guatemala. i - vi + 1 - 674 p.

Lacordaire JT. 1869. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Genera des coleopteres ou expose methodique et critique de tous les genres proposes jusqu'ici dans cet ordre d'insectes. Famille des longicornes (suite). Librairie Encyclopedique de Roret; Paris. 9 (1): 1 - 409.

LeConte JL. 1858. Catalogue of Coleoptera of the Regions adjacent to the Boundary Line between the United States and Mexico. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (2) 4: 9 - 42.

Leng CW. 1886. Synopses of Cerambycidae. Entomologica Americana 2 (3): 60 - 63, 2 pl.

Lingafelter SW, Nearns EH, Tavakilian GL, Monne MA, Biondi M. 2014. Longhorned woodboring beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae and Disteniidae): Primary types of the Smithsonian Institution. Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press; Washington DC. 390 p.

Maes J-M, van den Berghe E, Dauber D, Audureau A, Nearns E, Skillman F, Heffern D, Monne M. 2010. Catalogo ilustrado de los Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) de Nicaragua. Parte II - Cerambycinae. Revista Nicaraguense de Entomologia 70 (Suplemento 1 - 2): 1 - 640.

Mayr E. 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill Book Company; NY. 428 p.

Monne MA, Giesbert EF. 1994. Checklist of the Cerambycidae and Disteniidae (Coleoptera) of the Western Hemisphere. Wolfsgarden Books; Burbank, CA. i - xiv + 410 p.

Napp DS. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among the subfamilies of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera - Chrysomeloidea). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia; Sao Paulo 38 (2): 265 - 419.

Newman E. 1838. Entomological notes. The Entomological Magazine 5 (5): 483 - 500, 3 fig.

Noguera FA, Chemsak JA. 1996. Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). In: Biodiversidad, taxonomia y biogeografia de artropodos de Mexico: Hacia una Sintesis de su conocimiento. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico 1996: 381 - 409.

Noguera FA, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Chemsak JA, Rodriguez-Palafox A, Ramirez-Garcia E, Gonzalez-Soriano E, Ayala R. 2002. Diversity of the family Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the tropical dry forest of Mexico, I. Sierra de Huautla, Morelos. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95 (5): 617 - 627, 5 fig.

Noguera FA, Chemsak JA, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Rodriguez-Palafox A, Ramirez-Garcia E, Gonzalez-Soriano E, Ayala R. 2007. A faunal study of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) from one region with tropical dry forest in Mexico: San Buenaventura, Jalisco. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 83 (4): 296 - 314, 6 fig., 3 tab.

Noguera FA, Gutierrez N. 2016. New Distributional Records of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) from Mexico. The Coleopterists Bulletin 70 (3): 656 - 662.

Perkins RCL, Swezey OH. 1924. The introduction into Hawaii of insects that attack Lantana. Bulletin of the Hawaii Sugar Planters Association Experiment Station (Entomology) 16: 1 - 83, 7 fig., 1 pl.

Smyth EG. 1934. The gregarious habit of beetles. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 7 (4): 102 - 119.

Strauch A. 1861. Catalogue systematique de tous les Coleopteres decrits dans les Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France depuis 1832 jusqu'a 1859. Schmidt HW, Libraire-Editeur; Halle. i - iv + 160 p.

Terron SR. 1992. Fauna de coleopteros Cerambycidae de la Reserva de la Biosfera La Michilia Durango, Mexico. Folia Entomologica Mexicana 81 [1991]: 285 - 314, 16 fig.

Thomson J. 1864. Systema Cerambycidarum ou expose de tous les genres compris dans la famille des Cerambycides et familles limitrophes. Memoires de la Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege 19: 1 - 540.

Townsend CHT. 1895. On the Coleoptera of New Mexico and Arizona, including biologic and other notes. The Canadian Entomologist 27 (2): 39 - 51.

Turnbow RHJ, Cave RD, Thomas MC. 2003. A list of the Cerambycidae of Honduras, with additions of previously unrecorded species. Ceiba 44 (1): 1 - 43.

Vogt GB. 1949. Notes on Cerambycidae from the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas (Coleoptera). The Pan-Pacific Entomologist 25 (4): 175 - 184, 1 map.

White A. 1853. Longicornia I. Catalogue of the coleopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum; London 7: 1 - 174, pl. 1 - 4.

Gallery Image

Figures 103–120. Dorsal and lateral images of Stenaspis verticalis. 103–104) S. v. arizonicus (Casey 1912), male, 29 mm, Pima Co. AZ, USA. 105–106) S. v. arizonicus, female, 27 mm, Pima Co. AZ, USA. 107–108) Male, 23 mm, Val Verde Co. TX, USA. 109–110) S. v. insignis (Casey 1924), male, 30 mm, Medina Co. TX, USA. 111–112) S. v. insignis, female, 28 mm, Comal Co. TX, USA. 113–114) S. v. insignis, male, 29 mm, Cameron Co. TX, USA. 115–116) S. v. insignis, female, 27 mm, Cameron Co. TX, USA. 117–118) Male, 23 mm, Nuevo Leon, MEX. 119–120) Female, 31 mm, Nuevo Leon, MEX.

Gallery Image

Figures 121–136. Dorsal and lateral images of Stenaspis verticalis (cont.) 121–122) Female, 26 mm, Nayarit, MEX. 123–124) Male, 31 mm, Jalisco, MEX. 125–126) Female, 37 mm, Jalisco, MEX. 127–128) Female, 23 mm, Michoacán, MEX. 129–130) Female, 26 mm, Guerrero, MEX. 131–132) Male, 32 mm, Puebla, MEX. 133–134) Male, 27 mm, Oaxaca, MEX. 135–136) Female, 27 mm, Oaxaca, MEX.

Gallery Image

Figures 15–23. Pronotal and prosternal characteristic of Stenaspis verticalis: 15–17) S. verticalis, male, Jalisco, MEX with sides of pronotum rounded. 15) Disc coarsely punctate with 5 vague calli (red arrows). 16: 16a) Proepisternum inflated and finely punctate (dark reddish area). 16: 16b) Demarcation of proepisternal finely punctate area from coarsely punctate dorsum of disc. 17: 17a) Subrectangular impressed area. 17: 17b) Vague demarcation dividing proepisternum from the subrectangular impressed area. 18, 20) S. verticalis, male, Nuevo Leon, MEX with side of pronotum with distinct lateral tubercles. 19) S. verticalis, male, Puebla, MEX with proepisternum inflated and finely punctate clearly demarcated from dorsum. 21–22) S. verticalis, female, Guerrero, MEX with side of pronotum distinctly tuberculate. 21: 21a) Anterior angles obtusely tuberculate. 22) Pronotal disc and proepisternum coarsely punctate. 23) S. verticalis, female, Jalisco, MEX with prosternum coarsely punctate.

Gallery Image

Figures 24–32. Pronotal and prosternal characteristic of Stenaspis castaneipennis. 24–26) S. castaneipennis, male, Oaxaca, MEX with sides of pronotum rounded, disc coarsely punctate with 5 vague calli. 25) Proepisternum inflated and finely punctate (dark reddish area) clearly demarcated from coarsely punctate dorsum (black area). 27–29) S. castaneipennis, male, Oaxaca, MEX with sides of pronotum with distinct lateral tubercles. 28) Proepisternum inflated and finely punctate (reddish area) clearly demarcated from dorsum (black area). 29: 29a) Subrectangular finely punctate area of prosternum. 29: 29b) Demarcation line dividing proepisternum from finely punctate subrectangular area of prosternum. 30–32) S. castaneipennis, female, Oaxaca, MEX with side of pronotum distinctly tuberculate. 30: 30a) Anterior angles obtusely tuberculate. 31–32) Pronotal disc, proepisternum and prosternum coarsely punctate; proepisternun not demarcated from dorsum and prosternum.

Gallery Image

Figures 146–154. Changes in sculpturing of scape and pronotum of Stenaspis verticalis from northwestern USA to southeastern MEX. 146) S. v. arizonicus, male, Pima Co. AZ, USA with darker, duller integument, and more finely punctate scape. 147) Male, Val Verde Co., TX, USA with coarser punctures on scape and pronotum. 148) S. v. insignis, male, Medina Co. TX, USA with coarsely, contiguously punctate scapes, and pronotal disc that is polished, predominately bright reddish, and with two black spots in anterior half. 149) Female, Nayarit, MEX with polished, sparsely, finely punctate scape and pronotum. 150) Male, Jalisco, MEX resembling S. v. insignis but with dull reddish integument and pronotal disc that is coarsely, shallowly and contiguously punctate, and scape separately punctate. 151) Female, Michoacán, MEX with sparsely, finely punctate scape and pronotum. 152) Female, Guerrero, MEX with sparsely, finely punctate scape and coarsely punctate pronotum. 153) Male, Puebla, MEX with sparsely, shallowly punctate scape and pronotal disc. 154) Male, Oaxaca, MEX with more densely punctate pronotal disc and basal half of scape that is more consistently reddish.

Gallery Image

Figures 137–145. Variations in elytral sculpturing of Stenaspis verticalis from northwestern USA to southeastern MEX. 137) S. v. arizonicus, male, Pima Co. AZ, USA with finely, confluently, vermiculate-punctate elytra. 138) Male, Val Verde, TX, USA with coarser punctures. 139) S. v. insignis, male, Medina Co. TX, USA with coarsely, contiguously punctate metallic bluish elytra. 140) Female, Nayarit, MEX with separately punctate elytra. 141) Male, Jalisco, MEX with finer, separately punctate elytra. 142) Female, Michoacán, MEX with coarser, separately punctate elytra. 143) Female, Guerrero, MEX with even coarser punctures than female from Michoacán. 144) Male, Puebla, MEX with punctures well separated and sparser. 145) Male, Oaxaca, MEX with much coarser, separately punctate aeneous green elytra.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Genus

Stenaspis