Cloeodes auwe Salles et al. 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4319.1.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:14Ee4F4F-0Ac0-42E8-Bcdf-8Cf4De349A39 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6042301 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4267878D-FFB5-FFC9-2687-FACAFA8AFE01 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cloeodes auwe Salles et al. 2004 |
status |
|
Cloeodes auwe Salles et al. 2004 View in CoL
( Figs 126–136 View FIGURES 119 – 132 View FIGURES 133 – 135 View FIGURES 136 – 138 )
Cloeodes auwe Salles & Batista (in Salles et al.) 2004 View in CoL : 5 (larva); Falcao et al. 2011: 531 (larva); Massariol et al. 2013: 3 (larva, ♂ and ♀ imagoes).
Material examined. PERU, Region Loreto: Prov. Maynas, Quebrada El Sabalo (right tributary of Rio Itaya ) between Puente Itaya (57 km from Iquitos ) and San Joaquin (at Rio Amazon ), 4°16'S, 73°27'W, 2.II.2006, coll. N. Kluge: 1 L-S ♀ GoogleMaps ; Prov. Ucayali, Pampa Hermosa , 4°13'S, 75°22'W, 9–21.VIII.2013, coll. N. Kluge & L. Sheyko: 1 L/S ♂, 2 larvae GoogleMaps .
Descriptions. Larva. Larva has unusual coloration ( Falcao et al. 2011: Fig.83 View FIGURES 82 – 85 ), which represents combination of composite cuticular brown makings ( Fig. 133–134 View FIGURES 133 – 135 ) and hypodermal reddish and black spots ( Fig. 135 View FIGURES 133 – 135 ). Abdominal tergum I without denticles on posterior margin; terga II–X with long spine-like denticles ( Fig. 134 View FIGURES 133 – 135 ). All tergalii I–VII sharply widened posteriad, tergalius I also sharply widened anteriad ( Fig. 126–132 View FIGURES 119 – 132 ). Other characters as described by Salles et al. 2004, Falcao et al. 2011, Massariol et al. 2013.
DEVELOPING MALE GENITALS: In last larval instar, developing subimaginal gonostyli folded under larval cuticle in « Nigrobaetis -type» pose, with 2nd segment bent by convexity medially, and 3rd segment directed caudally ( Fig. 136 View FIGURES 136 – 138 ).
Subimago. TEXTURE: On all legs of both sexes last tarsal segment entirely covered by pointed microlepides; other tarsal segments at most part covered by blunt microlepides, apically by pointed microlepides ( Table 1).
Tarsal spines of winged stages. Tarsus of fore leg in male and female without apical spines. Tarsus of middle and hind leg of both sexes with 1 apical spine on initial 3rd tarsomere (next after 1st+2nd tarsomere) ( Table 1). Other characters of imago are described by Massariol et al. 2013.
Dimension. Fore wing length of male 4 mm, of female 5 mm ( Massariol et al. 2013).
Distribution. Amazonia ( Brazil, Peru).
Discussion. Massariol et al. (2013) wrote in diagnosis of this species: “6) ... segment I with a circular clear mark at anteromedial region; 7) Spines on posterior margin of tergum I present”. Actually the circular clear mark is present not on the abdominal segment I, but on the segment II; judging by the photo in the same paper, this segment II bears a regular row of long spines on posterior margin, while segment I has no spines ( Massariol et al. 2013: Fig. 2). Specimens examined by me also have spines beginning from tergum II, and no spines on tergum I.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Cloeodes auwe Salles et al. 2004
Kluge, Nikita J. 2017 |
Cloeodes auwe Salles & Batista (in Salles et al.) 2004
Massariol 2013: 3 |
Falcao 2011: 531 |
Salles 2004: 5 |