Anarthrura simplex G.O. Sars, 1882
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157876 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6B9E9090-603A-4A51-8A07-84FC54F9FE17 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5621920 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/422787BB-FFF2-E44C-3F67-6E26FC49FADD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anarthrura simplex G.O. Sars, 1882 |
status |
|
Anarthrura simplex G.O. Sars, 1882 View in CoL ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 )
Anarthrura simplex: G.O. Sars, 1882: 54 View in CoL .
Anarthrura simplex: G.O. Sars, 1896: 38 View in CoL –39, plate XVI figure 2.
Anarthrura simplex: Nierstrasz & Schurmans Stekhoven, 1930: 165 View in CoL , figure 40 (after Sars 1896). Anarthrura simplex: Stephensen, 1948: 178 View in CoL , 180, figures 56.16–56.20 (after Sars). Anarthrura simplex: Lang, 1971: 366 View in CoL , figure 2.
Anarthrura simplex: Holdich & Jones, 1983a: 88 View in CoL –89, figure 32.
Anarthrura simplex: Howson & Picton, 1997: 209 View in CoL , species code S1149.
Diagnosis. Anarthrura with pleonites fused. Dactylus/unguis of pereopods 1–3 as long as propodus and carpus, or nearly so. Cheliped fixed finger with four teeth. Uropod endopod twice as long as basal article.
Material examined. British shallowwater BT305 (northern North Sea, Brae Oilfield, ca. 58° 40’N 1° 15’E, 110 m.): one mancaII, three neuters, two ovigerous females, two preparatory males; BT304 (Brae Oilfield): one prep. male.
Redescription. (Also see G.O. Sars 1896). Neuter/nonovigerous female. Body ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A) slender, 7–8 times longer than broad. Length 1.74–2.35 mm. Cephalothorax about as long as broad, 15% of body length, with abruptly tapering rostral third. Pereonites 1–6 of different shapes, subhexagonal or subrectangular with rounded corners, 0.67, 1.0, 1.2, 1.2, 1.2 and 0.64 times as long broad respectively. Pleon ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B) 14% of body length, pleonites indistinct, appearing fused together, not distinct from pleotelson. Pleotelson ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B) short and with rounded posterior margin, bearing two setae.
Antennule ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 C) 0.8 times length of cephalothorax; article1 44% of total length, article2 1.6 times longer than broad; article4 with five setae and aesthetasc; other setation as figured. Antenna ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 D) 0.8 times length of antennule, article2 nearly twice as long as broad, without setae; article3 as long as broad, without seta (?); article4 about five times longer than broad, with distal setae and sensory setae; article5 3.5 times longer than broad, with distal setae; article6 small, with one short and two longer setae, the last possibly fused over basal half.
Mouthparts small, typical of genus. Labrum ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 E–F) broadly conical. Mandible ( Figs. 1 View FIGURE 1 E,G) incisor process weak and subrectangular. Maxillule endite ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 H) with four unequal spiniform setae. Maxilliped ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 L) bases small, lacking setae; endites as long as article1 of palps, with two distal setae; palp article3 largest.
Cheliped ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 J) basis less than half as long as pseudocoxa, with dorsolateral seta; merus triangular, with seta; carpus trapezoidal, 1.2 times longer than broad, with two ventral and two dorsal setae; propodus with anterior spiniform setae, one ventral seta, three spiniform setae near incisive margin and one near articulation with dactylus; fixed finger ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 K) with convex incisive margin with four teeth, terminal spine elongatetriangular; dactylus with large anterior spiniform seta.
Pereopods 1–3 similar but progressively smaller, pereopods 2–3 88 % and 80% length of pereopod1 respectively. Pereopod1 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A) basis curved, 4.5 times longer than broad, with dorsal seta; ischium with seta; merus about three times longer than broad; carpus subrectangular, 2.8 times longer than broad, with two distal seta; propodus over 3.5 times longer than broad, with dorsodistal seta; dactylus and unguis together nearly as long as propodus and carpus. Pereopod2 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 B) with shorter articles; merus with distal seta; carpus with one distal seta; dactylus and unguis as long as propodus and twothirds of carpus. Pereopod3 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 C) as pereopod2 but merus, propodus and dactylus/unguis shorter.
Pereopods 4–6 ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 D–F) similar, smaller than pereopods 1–3, with more tumid basis bearing one or two sensory setae; ischium with two setae; merus curved, with two ventral spiniform setae; carpus subrectangular, three times longer than broad; propodus as long as carpus, with one long and two shorter ventrodistal seta; pereopod6 ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F) propodus with additional long spiniform seta.
Uropods ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 G) longer than pleotelson, exopod as long as basal article, with two distal setae; endopod twice as long as basal article, weakly 2articled, with two sensory setae from article1 and article2 with five distal and terminal setae.
MancaII. Similar to neuter but pereonites shorter and pereopods6 absent. Length 0.83 mm.
Ovigerous female. Similar to neuter, but pleon more dorsoventrally compressed and broader, with thin oostegites on coxae of pereopods 1–4. Length 1.71–1.9 mm.
Preparatory male. Body ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 H) fairly slender, length 1.47–1.63 mm. Cephalothorax relatively small, as long as broad, abruptly truncate behind antennules. All pereonites shorter than wide, subrectangular. Pleon well developed, 20% of body length. Antennule very stout, 4 or 5articled depending on state of maturation; articles 1–3 about 1.5 times wider than in female. Pleopod ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 K) rami elongate, endopod smaller than exopod, with about nine and eleven terminal setae respectively; setae as long as rami.
Remarks. The description and drawings given by G.O. Sars are accurate. The very long dactylusunguis on pereopods 1–3 is diagnostic of this species.
It is a small and delicate shelf species, distributed in the Boreal province of Northeast Atlantic from western France to Tromso in northern Norway 30–270 m ( Dollfus 1898, Hansen 1909, Greve 1965a, b, 1966, 1968,). Published British records are sparse: only from the northern North Sea in the vicinity of the Fladen Ground and two stations in the Brae Oilfield, 110–140 m ( Holdich & Jones 1983a, b), i.e. British & North East Atlantic Marine Census Areas North Sea [8] and Viking [4] respectively. The record from the Sound of Kerrera ( Holdich & Bird 1986) has since proved to be erroneous and actually refers to Anarthrurella clairae gen. et sp. nov. (see below).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Anarthrura simplex G.O. Sars, 1882
Bird, Graham 2004 |
Anarthrura simplex:
Howson 1997: 209 |
Anarthrura simplex:
Holdich 1983: 88 |
Anarthrura simplex: Nierstrasz & Schurmans Stekhoven, 1930 : 165
Lang 1971: 366 |
Stephensen 1948: 178 |
Stekhoven 1930: 165 |
Anarthrura simplex:
Sars 1896: 38 |
Anarthrura simplex:
Sars 1882: 54 |