Dockovdia oruensis, Gledhill & Agbolade, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2645218 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/32548791-FF88-FFA6-C266-510D7F9F1D55 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2019-04-18 11:35:25, last updated 2024-11-29 01:36:16) |
scientific name |
Dockovdia oruensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Dockovdia oruensis sp. nov.
(Figures 1–19)
Material examined
Seven males, six females, dissected and mounted in glycerine jelly on microscope slides. Coll. Dr O.M. Agbolade from Potadoma moerchi collected in the Ojupon and Eri Oru streams, Oru, Ogun State, Nigeria, between December 2002 and September 2003. Holotype, male Prep. 1434, Allotype, female Prep . 1427. Paratypes, males Preps 1429, 1430, 1433, 1435, 1436 and 1438, females Preps 1426, 1428, 1431, 1432 and 1437.
Additional material
Paratypes, 25 undissected ovigerous females preserved in Koenike’s Solution , same data as above.
Diagnosis
With characters of the genus. Pedipalp with P4 not strongly tapering distally, P5 more than three times as high as long, cheliceral claw with only a fringe of short setae, common posterior margin of Cx1+2 not extending posteriorly.
The above combination of characters clearly separates Dockovdia oruensis from D. cookarum , the latter species having P5 only as high as long and the cheliceral claws densely covered in long fine setae.
Description
MALE (Figs 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16 and 17). With characters of the genus. Idiosoma in dorsal and ventral views an elongated oval, length, excluding gnathosoma, 646 (537–683, 622, n=6), width 403 (366–439, 407, n=6). Dorsum unstructured, glandularia and associated setae small, and difficult to define but moreorless as illustrated in Fig. 2. Ventrally, (Fig. 1) with coxae in three groups in anterior half of idiosoma; Cx1 fused with capitulum; posterolateral margins of Cx1+2 extended laterally; common hind margin of Cx1+2 not, or only slightly, produced posteriorly; length Cx1+2, 180 (156198, 176, n=7); medial margins of Cx4 moreorless straight and directed posterolaterally; suture lines between Cx3+4 complete; width across Cx4 at level of IV Legs, 336 (300342, 332, n=6); distance from posterior margin Cx1+2 to anterior margin of genital plate 240 (204264, 232, n=6). Genital acetabula on a common genital plate incorporating preand postgenital sclerites; three acetabula and four to six short, fine setae on each side of genital aperture (Figs 1, 4, 5 and 6; the latter figure shows genital acetabula on separate plates as in the female but smaller and the subcutaneous outline of the male ejaculatory complex); genital plate length 90 (6390, 81, n=6), genital plate width 81 (69–84, 78, n=7); distance from posterior margin of genital plate to posterior margin of idiosoma 159 (126–198, 162, n=6); excretory pore slitlike, close to posterior margin. Capitulum as in Figs 8 and 12 View FIGURES 8–12 (lateral views), note that the ventral extensions are damaged fused areas of the capitulum and first coxae. Pedipalps ( Figs 8, 9, 10 and 11 View FIGURES 8–12 ) stout; P2 without ventral projections, with two pinnate setae on medial lateral face and a short dorsal seta at level of proximal lateral seta; P3 with a single pinnate seta on medial lateral face; P4 without pinnate setae but with up to three small, fine setae distally; P5 somewhat rectangular, short, more than three times as high as long and with two long, stout, clawlike setae; dorsal lengths of pedipalp segments: P1, 24 (18–24, 21, n=9); P2, 81 (7284, 78, n=9); P3, 51 (48–66, 56, n=10); P4, 90 (78–90, 84, n=10); P5, 15 (12–15, 13, n=10); pedipalp tarsal claw lengths, 48, 48, 48, 45 (39–48, 44, n=20). Chelicerae ( Figs 15 and 16 View FIGURES 13–16 ) stout, length 213 (186–222, 205, n=6); cheliceral claws each with a row of short, fine setae; cheliceral claw length, 84 (75–84, 82, n=5). Legs similar to those of female but shorter (compare Figs 17 and 18 View FIGURES 17–19 illustrating ILeg of male and female respectively); I Leg.6 straight; claws of all legs each with two moreorless equal teeth; dorsal lengths of leg segments, ILeg.16: 36 (33–36, 35, n=7), 51 (42–51, 46, n=7), 78 (63–78, 70, n=7), 96 (87–96, 92, n=7), 108 (90–120, 103, n=6), 90 (75–90, 79, n=5); IILeg.1–6: (33–39, 36, n=4), 57 (45–66, 54, n=7), 81 (63–81, 76, n=5), 105 (96–111, 102, n=6), 120 (105–129, 117, n=7), 99 (75–99, 86, n=7); IIILeg.1–6: 45 (36–45, 42, n=4), 57 (51–60, 56, n=6), 87 (78–87, 83, n=7), 123 (111–129, 118, n=8), 144 (129–147, 137, n=8), 99 (90–105, 96, n=8); IVLeg.1–6: 87, 90 (75–90, 87, n=8), 87, 90 (78–90, 85, n=8), 120, 126 (111–126, 118, n=7), 156, 159 (144–171, 155, n=8), 171 (153–183, 165, n=5), 105 (102–111, 106, n=5).
FEMALE (Figs 3, 7, 13, 14, 18 and 19). Idiosoma larger, both longer and wider than that of male, length excluding gnathosoma, 1147 (964–1147, 1057, n=3), width 732 (695–817, 759, n=4). Dorsum as in male. Ventrally (Fig. 3) with coxae similar to those of male; length Cx1+2, 228 (198–240, 224, n=4); width across Cx4 at level of IVLegs, 498 (456–540, 504, n=5); distance from posterior margin Cx1 to anterior margin of pregenital sclerite 324 (264–324, 289, n=4). Genital field as in Figs 3 and 7; genital field length 174 (174–225, 187, n=5), width 171 (171–195, 138, n=4); distance from posterior margin of postgenital sclerite to posterior margin of idiosoma 402 (300–402, 358, n=3). Excretory pore as in male. Pedipalps ( Figs 13 and 14 View FIGURES 13–16 ) as in male but larger, dorsal lengths of pedipalp segments: P1, 22, 24 (21–27, 23, n=8), P2, 102, 90 (90–105, 95, n=10), P3, 72, 84 (69–84, 76, n=10), P4, 108, 108 (96–111, 103, n=11), P5, 15, 15 (15–18, 17, n=11); pedipalp tarsal claw lengths, 54, 54, 51, 51 (45–54, 51, n=18). Chelicerae as in male (see Figs 15 and 16 View FIGURES 13–16 ), length 312 (252–312, 280, n=9); cheliceral claw length 105 (105–114, 110, n=7). Legs ( Figs 18 and 19 View FIGURES 17–19 ) with chaetotaxy similar to that of male, I Leg.6 not bowed. Dorsal lengths of leg segments, ILeg.1–6: 45 (45, 45, n=1), 48 (45–48, 46, n=2), 87 (84–87, 86, n=2), 120 (111–120, 116, n=2), 120 (120–132, 126, n=3), 96, 120 (93–126, 108, n=6); IILeg.1–6: 36 (36, 36, n=1), 57 (48–57, 52, n=2), 96 (96, 96, n=2), 135 (126–135, 130, n=2), 156 (153–156, 154, n=2), 105, 138 (99–138, 118, n=6); III Leg.1–6: 60 (60, 60, n=1), 66 (66, 66, n=2), 99 (93–105, 99, n=3), 150 (150–159, 154, n=4), 159 (159–183, 167, n=4), (99–150, 123, n=4); IVLeg.1–6: 105 (102–111, 106, n=3), 114 (105–114, 110, n=2), 129 (129–162, 145, n=5), 180 (180–219, 207, n=5), 231 (189–231, 217, n=3), 153 (141–165, 153, n=3).
Most females were ovigerous, each ovum was within a relatively thickwalled (19–48 m, mean 30 m, n=15) egg case (query = shell membrane sensu Sokolov, 1977), the diameter of which ranged from 124–152 m (mean 135 m, n=15). The diameter of each of the 15 ova measured in corpus was 104 m.
Etymology Dockovdia oruensis n.sp. is named for the town of Oru, Nigeria.
Designation of type locality
Unfortunately specimens collected from the Ojupon and EriOru streams were combined. However, according to records held by the second author, Potadoma moerchi collected from the EriOru produced more specimens of Dockovdia oruensis than did P. moerchi from the Ojupon. Accordingly the EriOru stream is designated as the type locality.
Deposition of material The holotype and allotype of Dockovdia oruensis will be deposited in the Natural History Museum, London. Paratypes are retained in the collection of the first author.
FIGURES 8–12. Dockovdia oruensis sp. nov., 8, holotype, male Prep. 1434, infracapitulum with chelicera and left pedipalp. 9, holotype, male Prep. 1434, right pedipalp. 10, male Prep. 1436, left pedipalp with host tissue? attached to pedipalp tarsus ‘claws’. 11, male Prep. 1436, right predipalp. 12, male Prep. 1433, infracapitulum. Measurements in m.
FIGURES 13–16. Dockovdia oruensis sp. nov., 13, allotype, female Prep. 1427, left pedipalp. 14, allotype, female Prep. 1427, right pedipalp. 15, male Prep. 1433, chelicerae. 16, male Prep. 1438, chelicerae. Measurements in m.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Hygrobatinae |
Genus |
1 (by plazi, 2019-04-18 11:35:25)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2019-04-18 11:38:25)
3 (by plazi, 2019-09-20 08:30:48)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-20 08:40:52)
5 (by veselin, 2019-10-03 08:48:01)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-30 23:36:21)
7 (by plazi, 2023-10-30 13:25:23)